TSTP Solution File: NUN073+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUN073+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:26:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   96 (  38 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (  55   ~;  44   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   2 sgn  30   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(oneuneqtwo,conjecture,
    ! [X39] :
      ( ! [X22] :
          ( ! [X16] :
              ( ~ r1(X16)
              | ~ r2(X16,X22) )
          | X22 != X39 )
      | ! [X23] :
          ( ! [X17] :
              ( ~ r1(X17)
              | ~ r2(X17,X23) )
          | ~ r2(X23,X39) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',oneuneqtwo) ).

fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_7a) ).

fof(axiom_3a,axiom,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ! [X28] :
          ( ! [X29] :
              ( ~ r2(X26,X29)
              | X29 != X28 )
          | ~ r2(X27,X28) )
      | X26 = X27 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_3a) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X39] :
        ( ! [X22] :
            ( ! [X16] :
                ( ~ r1(X16)
                | ~ r2(X16,X22) )
            | X22 != X39 )
        | ! [X23] :
            ( ! [X17] :
                ( ~ r1(X17)
                | ~ r2(X17,X23) )
            | ~ r2(X23,X39) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[oneuneqtwo]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ( r1(X4)
        | ~ r1(X4) )
      & ( X4 = esk10_0
        | ~ r1(X4) )
      & ( r1(X4)
        | X4 != esk10_0 )
      & ( X4 = esk10_0
        | X4 != esk10_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk3_0)
    & r2(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & esk2_0 = esk1_0
    & r1(esk5_0)
    & r2(esk5_0,esk4_0)
    & r2(esk4_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = esk10_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X6,X8] :
      ( ( r2(X6,X8)
        | ~ r2(X6,X8) )
      & ( X8 = esk6_1(X6)
        | ~ r2(X6,X8) )
      & ( r2(X6,X8)
        | X8 != esk6_1(X6) )
      & ( X8 = esk6_1(X6)
        | X8 != esk6_1(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    esk10_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X44,X45,X46] :
      ( ~ r1(X46)
      | X46 != X45
      | ~ r2(X44,X45) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X30,X31,X32,X33] :
      ( ~ r2(X30,X33)
      | X33 != X32
      | ~ r2(X31,X32)
      | X30 = X31 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_3a])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X2 = esk6_1(X1)
    | ~ r2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk5_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = esk5_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | X3 != X2
    | ~ r1(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | X4 != X3
    | ~ r2(X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_1(esk5_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_1(esk3_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk4_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk10_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk3_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_11]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk3_0
    | ~ r2(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 != esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUN073+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 06:54:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 37
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 26
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 20
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 17
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 8
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 47
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 58
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 59
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 55
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 28
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 52
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1212
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2852 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------