TSTP Solution File: NUN073+2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUN073+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:09:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  107 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  130 (  62   ~;  49   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   2 sgn;  40   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oTqMvz31F9/E---3.1_7591.p',axiom_1) ).

fof(oneuneqtwo,conjecture,
    ! [X39] :
      ( ! [X22] :
          ( ! [X16] :
              ( ~ r1(X16)
              | ~ r2(X16,X22) )
          | X22 != X39 )
      | ! [X23] :
          ( ! [X17] :
              ( ~ r1(X17)
              | ~ r2(X17,X23) )
          | ~ r2(X23,X39) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oTqMvz31F9/E---3.1_7591.p',oneuneqtwo) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oTqMvz31F9/E---3.1_7591.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_3a,axiom,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ! [X28] :
          ( ! [X29] :
              ( ~ r2(X26,X29)
              | X29 != X28 )
          | ~ r2(X27,X28) )
      | X26 = X27 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oTqMvz31F9/E---3.1_7591.p',axiom_3a) ).

fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oTqMvz31F9/E---3.1_7591.p',axiom_7a) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X39] :
        ( ! [X22] :
            ( ! [X16] :
                ( ~ r1(X16)
                | ~ r2(X16,X22) )
            | X22 != X39 )
        | ! [X23] :
            ( ! [X17] :
                ( ~ r1(X17)
                | ~ r2(X17,X23) )
            | ~ r2(X23,X39) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[oneuneqtwo])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X76] :
      ( ( r1(X76)
        | ~ r1(X76) )
      & ( X76 = esk18_0
        | ~ r1(X76) )
      & ( r1(X76)
        | X76 != esk18_0 )
      & ( X76 = esk18_0
        | X76 != esk18_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk3_0)
    & r2(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & esk2_0 = esk1_0
    & r1(esk5_0)
    & r2(esk5_0,esk4_0)
    & r2(esk4_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = esk18_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ! [X28] :
          ( ! [X29] :
              ( ~ r2(X26,X29)
              | X29 != X28 )
          | ~ r2(X27,X28) )
      | X26 = X27 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_3a]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X49,X51] :
      ( ( r2(X49,X51)
        | ~ r2(X49,X51) )
      & ( X51 = esk6_1(X49)
        | ~ r2(X49,X51) )
      & ( r2(X49,X51)
        | X51 != esk6_1(X49) )
      & ( X51 = esk6_1(X49)
        | X51 != esk6_1(X49) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    esk18_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X64,X65,X66,X67] :
      ( ~ r2(X64,X67)
      | X67 != X66
      | ~ r2(X65,X66)
      | X64 = X65 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = esk6_1(X2)
    | ~ r2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk5_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = esk5_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = X4
    | ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ r2(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_1(esk5_0) = esk4_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_1(esk3_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X72,X73,X74] :
      ( ~ r1(X74)
      | X74 != X73
      | ~ r2(X72,X73) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk4_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk3_0
    | ~ r2(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem    : NUN073+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:48:06 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oTqMvz31F9/E---3.1_7591.p
% 0.22/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # sh5l with pid 7672 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 7673 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.22/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 45
% 0.22/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.22/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 37
% 0.22/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 76
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.22/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.22/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 68
% 0.22/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.22/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 0.22/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 84
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 91
% 0.22/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 78
% 0.22/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.22/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 39
% 0.22/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 45
% 0.22/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 0.22/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.22/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 45
% 0.22/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 66
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.22/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24
% 0.22/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.22/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.22/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 0.22/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.22/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1907
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.53  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.53  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.22/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------