TSTP Solution File: NUN071+2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUN071+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   58 (  49 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (  29 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ r1(X)
    | X = 'SKOLEMAAAV1' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ r2(X,Y)
    | Y = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ r3(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = 'SKOLEMAAAV3'(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_3) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ r4(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = 'SKOLEMAAAV4'(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( X != 'SKOLEMAAAV4'(Y,Z)
    | r4(Y,Z,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    r2(X,'SKOLEMAAAV7'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV7'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV6'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAV6'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV5'(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    r2('SKOLEMAAAV8'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAV5'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    r3(X,Y,'SKOLEMAAAV8'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    r2(X,'SKOLEMAAAV11'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAV11'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV10'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAV10'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV9'(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    r3('SKOLEMAAAV12'(X,Y),X,'SKOLEMAAAV9'(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    r3('SKOLEMAAAV12'(X,Y),X,'SKOLEMAAAV10'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[17,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    r4(X,Y,'SKOLEMAAAV12'(X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2a) ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAV14'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV13'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAV13'(X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAV16'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAV16'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV15'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAV17'(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    'SKOLEMAAAV15'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAV17'(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

cnf(33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r4(X,X,Y)
    | ~ r1(Z)
    | ~ r2(Z,X)
    | Y != U
    | ~ r1(V)
    | ~ r2(V,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',onetimesoneeqone) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAV15'(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[26,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14'(X),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[22,23,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV7'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV5'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[10,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV16'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAV1',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,24]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    r1('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[24,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV15'(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[25,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(40,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV15'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAV1',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,34]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,40,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV14'(X) = 'SKOLEMAAAV1',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,21]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1',X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[35,43,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV11'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,14]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y),'SKOLEMAAAV10'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[15,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    r2(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(48,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV7'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,9]) ).

cnf(49,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y),'SKOLEMAAAV5'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[36,48,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV5'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV8'(X,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,12]) ).

cnf(57,plain,
    X = 'SKOLEMAAAV3'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,44]) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV8'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV3'(Y,X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,13]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV5'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV3'(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[50,58,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    r3(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y),'SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV3'(X,Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[49,61,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV3'(X,Y)) = 'SKOLEMAAAV3'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,62]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV1' = 'SKOLEMAAAV4'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,42]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV12'(X,Y) = 'SKOLEMAAAV4'(X,Y),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,19]) ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ( X != 'SKOLEMAAAV12'(Y,Z)
    | r4(Y,Z,X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,67,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    ( ~ r4(X,Y,Z)
    | Z = 'SKOLEMAAAV12'(X,Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[7,67,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV1' = 'SKOLEMAAAV12'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[66,67,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(88,plain,
    ~ r2('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV1'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,46,38,47,38,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(95,plain,
    r3('SKOLEMAAAV1',X,'SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1',X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,70,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    ( X != 'SKOLEMAAAV1'
    | r4(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV1',X) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[68,70,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1',X) = 'SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV1',X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,95]) ).

cnf(106,plain,
    r4(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV1')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[96,57]),97,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(107,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV1') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1',
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[69,106]),70,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(131,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2'(X)) = 'SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV10'('SKOLEMAAAV1',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[97,65,theory(equality)]),97,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[88,47,107,131,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : NUN071+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 04:17:01 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  "."
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T04:17:01
% 0.20/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-06-02T04:17:01
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.38/0.57  ; Recognized relation function assertion (|r4| ?X ?Y (SKOLEMAAAV12 ?X ?Y)).
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  #||
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.58  ||#
% 0.41/0.58  
% 0.41/0.58  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.41/0.58  ;       529 formulas have been input or derived (from 73 formulas).
% 0.41/0.58  ;       132 (25%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.41/0.58  ;           36 (27%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.41/0.58  ;           96 (73%) are still being kept.
% 0.41/0.58  ; 
% 0.41/0.58  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.005   6%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.002   3%   Assert                       (12 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.016  20%   Process new row              (451 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.011  14%   Resolution                   (144 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.005   6%   Paramodulation               (72 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (5 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (70 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.004   5%   Forward subsumption          (70 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (50 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (58 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.005   6%   Forward simplification       (444 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.003   4%   Backward simplification      (131 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (260 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.027  34%   Other
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.079        Total
% 0.41/0.58  ;     0.084        Real time
% 0.41/0.58  ; 
% 0.41/0.58  ; Term-hash-array has 221 terms in all.
% 0.41/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 44 entries (44 at peak, 50 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.41/0.58  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 150 nodes (150 at peak, 172 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.41/0.58  ;  Retrieved 135 possibly forward subsuming rows in 70 calls.
% 0.41/0.58  ;  Retrieved 9 possibly backward subsumed rows in 50 calls.
% 0.41/0.58  ; Path-index has 178 entries (185 at peak, 232 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.41/0.58  ; Path-index has 485 nodes (495 at peak, 557 added, 72 deleted).
% 0.41/0.58  ; Trie-index has 178 entries (185 at peak, 232 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.41/0.58  ; Trie-index has 470 nodes (498 at peak, 615 added, 145 deleted).
% 0.41/0.58  ; Retrieved 574 generalization terms in 1,362 calls.
% 0.41/0.58  ; Retrieved 88 instance terms in 80 calls.
% 0.41/0.58  ; Retrieved 4,861 unifiable terms in 1,578 calls.
% 0.41/0.58  ; 
% 0.41/0.58  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.41/0.58  ;     4 with value 0
% 0.41/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.41/0.58  ;     1 with value 18              1 with value 19
% 0.41/0.58  ; The agenda of rows to give has 36 entries:
% 0.41/0.58  ;     2 with value (4 13)          3 with value (4 18)           1 with value (4 24)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     3 with value (4 14)          1 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 25)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     6 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 21)           1 with value (4 31)
% 0.41/0.58  ;    10 with value (4 16)          2 with value (4 22)           1 with value (4 32)
% 0.41/0.58  ;     1 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 23)
% 0.41/0.58  Evaluation took:
% 0.41/0.58    0.085 seconds of real time
% 0.41/0.58    0.069759 seconds of user run time
% 0.41/0.58    0.014932 seconds of system run time
% 0.41/0.58    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.41/0.58    0 page faults and
% 0.41/0.58    7,394,656 bytes consed.
% 0.41/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.41/0.58  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T04:17:01
% 0.41/0.58  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.41/0.58  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------