TSTP Solution File: NUN069+2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : NUN069+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:09:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 18 ~; 12 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 5 sgn; 10 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(oneeqone,conjecture,
? [X39] :
( X39 = X39
& ? [X22] :
( r1(X22)
& r2(X22,X39) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zftnztmWcB/E---3.1_15021.p',oneeqone) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X3] :
? [X4] :
! [X5] :
( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
& X5 != X4 )
| ( r2(X3,X5)
& X5 = X4 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zftnztmWcB/E---3.1_15021.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
! [X33] :
? [X34] :
( ? [X35] :
( r1(X35)
& r4(X33,X35,X34) )
& ? [X36] :
( r1(X36)
& X34 = X36 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zftnztmWcB/E---3.1_15021.p',axiom_5a) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X39] :
( X39 = X39
& ? [X22] :
( r1(X22)
& r2(X22,X39) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[oneeqone]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X44,X45] :
( X44 != X44
| ~ r1(X45)
| ~ r2(X45,X44) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X3] :
? [X4] :
! [X5] :
( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
& X5 != X4 )
| ( r2(X3,X5)
& X5 = X4 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ r1(X2)
| ~ r2(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X77] :
( r1(esk17_1(X77))
& r4(X77,esk17_1(X77),esk16_1(X77))
& r1(esk18_1(X77))
& esk16_1(X77) = esk18_1(X77) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X46,X48] :
( ( r2(X46,X48)
| ~ r2(X46,X48) )
& ( X48 = esk1_1(X46)
| ~ r2(X46,X48) )
& ( r2(X46,X48)
| X48 != esk1_1(X46) )
& ( X48 = esk1_1(X46)
| X48 != esk1_1(X46) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X2)
| ~ r2(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
r1(esk18_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( r2(X1,X2)
| X2 != esk1_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ r2(esk18_1(X1),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
r2(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : NUN069+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:44:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zftnztmWcB/E---3.1_15021.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # sh5l with pid 15101 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with pid 15102 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 40
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 32
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 61
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 58
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 19
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 33
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1382
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------