TSTP Solution File: NUN069+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUN069+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.07s 1.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   4 unt;  24 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   6   ~;   2   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   38 (  23   >;  15   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (;   8   !;   5   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ r4 > r3 > r2 > r1 > #nlpp > #skF_11 > #skF_16 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_18 > #skF_19 > #skF_3 > #skF_15 > #skF_12 > #skF_10 > #skF_1 > #skF_8 > #skF_13 > #skF_17 > #skF_14 > #skF_7 > #skF_9 > #skF_5 > #skF_4 > #skF_20

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r2,type,
    r2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r3,type,
    r3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r4,type,
    r4: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r1,type,
    r1: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i > $i ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [X11] :
    ? [Y21] :
    ! [X12] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X11,X12)
        & ( X12 != Y21 ) )
      | ( r2(X11,X12)
        & ( X12 = Y21 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

tff(f_190,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [Y1] :
        ( ( Y1 = Y1 )
        & ? [Y2] :
            ( r1(Y2)
            & r2(Y2,Y1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oneeqone) ).

tff(f_149,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
    ? [Y9] :
      ( ? [Y16] :
          ( r1(Y16)
          & r3(X4,Y16,Y9) )
      & ( Y9 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [X11_3] : r2(X11_3,'#skF_2'(X11_3)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    ! [Y2_95,Y1_96] :
      ( ~ r2(Y2_95,Y1_96)
      | ~ r1(Y2_95) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_190]) ).

tff(c_142,plain,
    ! [X11_3] : ~ r1(X11_3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_138]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [X4_63] : r1('#skF_14'(X4_63)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_149]) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_64]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : NUN069+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:27:43 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.07/1.68  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.07/1.69  
% 3.07/1.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.15/1.71  
% 3.15/1.71  Inference rules
% 3.15/1.71  ----------------------
% 3.15/1.71  #Ref     : 0
% 3.15/1.71  #Sup     : 11
% 3.15/1.71  #Fact    : 0
% 3.15/1.71  #Define  : 0
% 3.15/1.71  #Split   : 0
% 3.15/1.71  #Chain   : 0
% 3.15/1.71  #Close   : 0
% 3.15/1.71  
% 3.15/1.71  Ordering : KBO
% 3.15/1.71  
% 3.15/1.71  Simplification rules
% 3.15/1.71  ----------------------
% 3.15/1.71  #Subsume      : 2
% 3.15/1.71  #Demod        : 6
% 3.15/1.71  #Tautology    : 16
% 3.15/1.71  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 3.15/1.71  #BackRed      : 4
% 3.15/1.71  
% 3.15/1.71  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.15/1.71  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.15/1.71  
% 3.15/1.71  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.15/1.71  ----------------------
% 3.15/1.71  Preprocessing        : 0.52
% 3.15/1.71  Parsing              : 0.25
% 3.15/1.71  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 3.15/1.71  Main loop            : 0.17
% 3.15/1.71  Inferencing          : 0.04
% 3.15/1.71  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.15/1.71  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.15/1.71  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.15/1.71  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 3.15/1.71  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.15/1.71  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.15/1.72  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.15/1.72  Total                : 0.73
% 3.15/1.72  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.16/1.72  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.16/1.72  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.16/1.72  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------