TSTP Solution File: NUN069+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : NUN069+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n185.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 14:27:06 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 0.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 83 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 100 ( 45 ~; 29 |; 26 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 4 sgn 23 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( ( id(X3,X2)
& r2(X1,X3) )
| ( ~ r2(X1,X3)
& ~ id(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp95FVsK/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',axiom_2) ).
fof(4,axiom,
? [X12] :
! [X13] :
( ( id(X13,X12)
& r1(X13) )
| ( ~ r1(X13)
& ~ id(X13,X12) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp95FVsK/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',axiom_1) ).
fof(7,axiom,
! [X19] : id(X19,X19),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp95FVsK/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',axiom_5) ).
fof(11,conjecture,
? [X10] :
( id(X10,X10)
& ? [X29] :
( r1(X29)
& r2(X29,X10) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp95FVsK/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',oneidone) ).
fof(12,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X10] :
( id(X10,X10)
& ? [X29] :
( r1(X29)
& r2(X29,X10) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[11]) ).
fof(13,plain,
! [X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( ( id(X3,X2)
& r2(X1,X3) )
| ( ~ r2(X1,X3)
& ~ id(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(15,plain,
? [X12] :
! [X13] :
( ( id(X13,X12)
& r1(X13) )
| ( ~ r1(X13)
& ~ id(X13,X12) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[4,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(21,plain,
! [X4] :
? [X5] :
! [X6] :
( ( id(X6,X5)
& r2(X4,X6) )
| ( ~ r2(X4,X6)
& ~ id(X6,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
fof(22,plain,
! [X4,X6] :
( ( id(X6,esk1_1(X4))
& r2(X4,X6) )
| ( ~ r2(X4,X6)
& ~ id(X6,esk1_1(X4)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[21]) ).
fof(23,plain,
! [X4,X6] :
( ( ~ r2(X4,X6)
| id(X6,esk1_1(X4)) )
& ( ~ id(X6,esk1_1(X4))
| id(X6,esk1_1(X4)) )
& ( ~ r2(X4,X6)
| r2(X4,X6) )
& ( ~ id(X6,esk1_1(X4))
| r2(X4,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
( r2(X1,X2)
| ~ id(X2,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
fof(38,plain,
? [X14] :
! [X15] :
( ( id(X15,X14)
& r1(X15) )
| ( ~ r1(X15)
& ~ id(X15,X14) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(39,plain,
! [X15] :
( ( id(X15,esk5_0)
& r1(X15) )
| ( ~ r1(X15)
& ~ id(X15,esk5_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[38]) ).
fof(40,plain,
! [X15] :
( ( ~ r1(X15)
| id(X15,esk5_0) )
& ( ~ id(X15,esk5_0)
| id(X15,esk5_0) )
& ( ~ r1(X15)
| r1(X15) )
& ( ~ id(X15,esk5_0)
| r1(X15) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
cnf(41,plain,
( r1(X1)
| ~ id(X1,esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
fof(49,plain,
! [X20] : id(X20,X20),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
cnf(50,plain,
id(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[49]) ).
fof(66,negated_conjecture,
! [X10] :
( ~ id(X10,X10)
| ! [X29] :
( ~ r1(X29)
| ~ r2(X29,X10) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(67,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ~ id(X30,X30)
| ! [X31] :
( ~ r1(X31)
| ~ r2(X31,X30) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[66]) ).
fof(68,negated_conjecture,
! [X30,X31] :
( ~ r1(X31)
| ~ r2(X31,X30)
| ~ id(X30,X30) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[67]) ).
cnf(69,negated_conjecture,
( ~ id(X1,X1)
| ~ r2(X2,X1)
| ~ r1(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[68]) ).
cnf(83,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X2)
| $false
| ~ r2(X2,X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[69,50,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(84,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X2)
| ~ r2(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[83,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(86,plain,
r2(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[24,50,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(114,negated_conjecture,
~ r1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[84,86,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(123,negated_conjecture,
~ id(X1,esk5_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[114,41,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(172,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[123,50,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(176,negated_conjecture,
$false,
172,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : NUN069+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.25 % Computer : n185.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.25 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.03/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.25 % DateTime : Sat Feb 23 19:49:43 CST 2019
% 0.03/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.29 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.29 --creating new selector for [NUM009+0.ax]
% 0.08/0.37 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp95FVsK/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.08/0.37 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp95FVsK/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.08/0.37 -prover status Theorem
% 0.08/0.37 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.08/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.37 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.38 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.08/0.38 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.08/0.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.38 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------