TSTP Solution File: NUN069+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUN069+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:26:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 10 ~; 5 |; 16 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 4 sgn 10 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(oneidone,conjecture,
? [X63] :
( id(X63,X63)
& ? [X46] :
( r1(X46)
& r2(X46,X63) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',oneidone) ).
fof(axiom_5,axiom,
! [X14] : id(X14,X14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_5) ).
fof(axiom_1a,axiom,
! [X38,X39] :
? [X40] :
( ? [X41] :
( id(X41,X40)
& ? [X42] :
( r2(X39,X42)
& r3(X38,X42,X41) ) )
& ? [X43] :
( r2(X43,X40)
& r3(X38,X39,X43) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).
fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
! [X54] :
? [X55] :
( id(X55,X54)
& ? [X56] :
( r1(X56)
& r3(X54,X56,X55) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X63] :
( id(X63,X63)
& ? [X46] :
( r1(X46)
& r2(X46,X63) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[oneidone]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X64,X65] :
( ~ id(X64,X64)
| ~ r1(X65)
| ~ r2(X65,X64) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X15] : id(X15,X15),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X1)
| ~ id(X2,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
id(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X44,X45] :
( id(esk10_2(X44,X45),esk9_2(X44,X45))
& r2(X45,esk11_2(X44,X45))
& r3(X44,esk11_2(X44,X45),esk10_2(X44,X45))
& r2(esk12_2(X44,X45),esk9_2(X44,X45))
& r3(X44,X45,esk12_2(X44,X45)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X57] :
( id(esk6_1(X57),X57)
& r1(esk7_1(X57))
& r3(X57,esk7_1(X57),esk6_1(X57)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
r2(X1,esk11_2(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
r1(esk7_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ r1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : NUN069+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 10:41:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 59
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 16
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 44
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 99
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 89
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 94
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 23
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 176
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 173
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3387
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3056 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------