TSTP Solution File: NUN066+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUN066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : NUN066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 07:17:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.48  SPASS derived 234 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 201 clauses.
% 0.19/0.48  SPASS allocated 97861 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.48  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.48  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 33 :
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.48  1[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skf26(u))*.
% 0.19/0.48  6[0:Inp] ||  -> id__dfg(u,skf23(u))*r.
% 0.19/0.48  9[0:Inp] ||  -> r2(skf26(u),skf25(u))*.
% 0.19/0.48  10[0:Inp] ||  -> r2(skf25(u),skf24(u))*.
% 0.19/0.48  15[0:Inp] SkP9(u) ||  -> r1(skf23(u))*.
% 0.19/0.48  16[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP9(u) id__dfg(u,skf24(u))*r.
% 0.19/0.48  29[0:Inp] r1(u) || SkP4(u,v)* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  41[0:Inp] || id__dfg(u,v) -> r1(u) SkP4(v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  46[0:Inp] || r2(u,v) SkP5(w,x,v,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  48[0:Inp] || id__dfg(u,v)* id__dfg(v,w)* -> id__dfg(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.48  49[0:Inp] r1(u) || r2(v,w)* id__dfg(u,w)* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  58[0:Inp] || r2(u,v)* r2(w,x)* id__dfg(x,v)* -> id__dfg(w,u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  60[0:Inp] || id__dfg(u,v) id__dfg(w,x) -> r2(x,v) SkP5(v,x,u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.48  75[0:Res:9.0,46.0] || SkP5(u,v,skf25(w),skf26(w))* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  78[0:Res:9.0,49.2] r1(u) || id__dfg(u,skf25(v))* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  79[0:Res:9.0,58.1] || r2(u,v)* id__dfg(skf25(w),v)* -> id__dfg(skf26(w),u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  89[0:Res:6.0,49.1] r1(u) || r2(v,skf23(u))* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  90[0:Res:6.0,41.0] ||  -> r1(u) SkP4(skf23(u),u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  96[0:Res:6.0,60.1] || id__dfg(u,v) -> r2(v,skf23(w)) SkP5(skf23(w),v,w,u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  102[0:Res:1.0,78.0] || id__dfg(skf26(u),skf25(v))* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  113[0:Res:10.0,79.1] || id__dfg(skf25(u),skf24(v))* -> id__dfg(skf26(u),skf25(v)).
% 0.19/0.48  129[0:Res:6.0,96.0] ||  -> r2(skf23(u),skf23(v)) SkP5(skf23(v),skf23(u),v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  148[0:MRR:113.1,102.0] || id__dfg(skf25(u),skf24(v))* -> .
% 0.19/0.48  165[0:Res:90.1,29.1] r1(skf23(u)) ||  -> r1(u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  166[0:SoR:165.0,15.1] SkP9(u) ||  -> r1(u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  167[0:SoR:165.0,166.1] SkP9(skf23(u)) ||  -> r1(u)*.
% 0.19/0.48  181[0:Res:16.1,148.0] ||  -> SkP9(skf25(u))*.
% 0.19/0.48  183[0:NCh:48.2,48.1,16.1,148.0] || id__dfg(skf25(u),v)*+ -> SkP9(v)*.
% 0.19/0.48  203[0:Res:6.0,183.0] ||  -> SkP9(skf23(skf25(u)))*.
% 0.19/0.48  213[0:SoR:167.0,203.0] ||  -> r1(skf25(u))*.
% 0.19/0.48  319[0:Res:129.1,75.0] ||  -> r2(skf23(skf26(u)),skf23(skf25(u)))*.
% 0.19/0.48  322[0:Res:319.0,89.1] r1(skf25(u)) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.48  324[0:SSi:322.0,181.0,213.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : nonzerononetwoexistid axiom_5 axiom_6 axiom_5a axiom_1a axiom_8 axiom_9 axiom_7 axiom_7a axiom_3a
% 0.19/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------