TSTP Solution File: NUN062+2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : NUN062+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:09:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  31   ~;  22   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   7 sgn;  20   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(infiniteNumbers,conjecture,
    ! [X14] :
    ? [X22,X39] :
      ( ! [X16] :
          ( ~ r1(X16)
          | X39 != X16 )
      & ? [X23] :
          ( r3(X14,X39,X23)
          & X23 = X22 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QXo1Nd7wmf/E---3.1_24668.p',infiniteNumbers) ).

fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QXo1Nd7wmf/E---3.1_24668.p',axiom_7a) ).

fof(axiom_1a,axiom,
    ! [X14,X15] :
    ? [X16] :
      ( ? [X17] :
          ( ? [X18] :
              ( r2(X15,X18)
              & r3(X14,X18,X17) )
          & X17 = X16 )
      & ? [X19] :
          ( r2(X19,X16)
          & r3(X14,X15,X19) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QXo1Nd7wmf/E---3.1_24668.p',axiom_1a) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X14] :
      ? [X22,X39] :
        ( ! [X16] :
            ( ~ r1(X16)
            | X39 != X16 )
        & ? [X23] :
            ( r3(X14,X39,X23)
            & X23 = X22 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[infiniteNumbers])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X45,X46,X48] :
      ( ( r1(esk2_2(X45,X46))
        | ~ r3(esk1_0,X46,X48)
        | X48 != X45 )
      & ( X46 = esk2_2(X45,X46)
        | ~ r3(esk1_0,X46,X48)
        | X48 != X45 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X68,X69,X70] :
      ( ~ r1(X70)
      | X70 != X69
      | ~ r2(X68,X69) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ r3(esk1_0,X2,X3)
    | X3 != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk2_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ r3(esk1_0,X1,X3)
    | X3 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] :
      ( r2(X54,esk6_2(X53,X54))
      & r3(X53,esk6_2(X53,X54),esk5_2(X53,X54))
      & esk5_2(X53,X54) = esk4_2(X53,X54)
      & r2(esk7_2(X53,X54),esk4_2(X53,X54))
      & r3(X53,X54,esk7_2(X53,X54)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk2_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ r3(esk1_0,X2,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_2(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ r3(esk1_0,X2,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    r2(X1,esk6_2(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(X1)
    | ~ r3(esk1_0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk7_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ r1(esk6_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    r1(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : NUN062+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 21:15:37 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.QXo1Nd7wmf/E---3.1_24668.p
% 0.15/0.42  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # new_bool_3 with pid 24746 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24749 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 22
% 0.15/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 51
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 51
% 0.15/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.15/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 18
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.15/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 11
% 0.15/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 12
% 0.15/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 13
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.15/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 15
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 31
% 0.15/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24
% 0.15/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.15/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1175
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.15/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------