TSTP Solution File: NUN062+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUN062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:24:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.32s 2.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (   0 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ( r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ id(X2,esk10_1(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_43,plain,
    id(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( id(X1,esk22_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ id(X3,X2)
    | ~ r3(esk21_0,X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk22_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ id(X3,X1)
    | ~ r3(esk21_0,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_59) ).

cnf(i_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ id(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_49) ).

cnf(i_0_52,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | ~ id(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ipijtlcz/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ id(X2,esk10_1(X1)) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    id(X1,X1),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ( id(X1,esk22_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ id(X3,X2)
    | ~ r3(esk21_0,X1,X3) ),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk22_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ id(X3,X1)
    | ~ r3(esk21_0,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ id(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    r2(X1,esk10_1(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( id(X1,esk22_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ id(esk4_2(esk21_0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( r1(esk22_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ id(esk4_2(esk21_0,X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( ~ id(X1,esk10_1(X2))
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | ~ id(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    id(X1,esk22_2(esk4_2(esk21_0,X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    r1(esk22_2(esk4_2(esk21_0,X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ~ r1(esk10_1(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    r1(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]),c_0_80])]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUN062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 04:29:36 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.32/2.45  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.32/2.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.32/2.45  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.32/2.45  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C12_11_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S065A
% 8.32/2.45  # and selection function SelectComplexAHP.
% 8.32/2.45  #
% 8.32/2.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 8.32/2.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.32/2.45  
% 8.32/2.45  # Proof found!
% 8.32/2.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.32/2.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.32/2.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.32/2.45  
% 8.32/2.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.32/2.45  # User time                : 0.041 s
% 8.32/2.45  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.32/2.45  # Total time               : 0.047 s
% 8.32/2.45  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.32/2.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------