TSTP Solution File: NUM924_1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM924_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:15:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  25 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  196 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   7   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  164 ( 164 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   18 (  16 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  27   !;   0   ?;  27   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(3,axiom,
    ord_less_int(times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),t),times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),zero_zero_int)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2__096_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_At_A_060_A_I4_A_K_Am_A_L_A1_J_A_K_A0_096) ).

tff(4,axiom,
    plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int) = times_times_int(plus_plus_int(times_times_int(number_number_of_int(bit0(bit0(bit1(pls)))),m),one_one_int),t),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3_t) ).

tff(8,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] : ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(X,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power_int(Y,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls))))),zero_zero_int),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_7_not__sum__power2__lt__zero) ).

tff(19,axiom,
    power_power_int(one_one_int,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) = one_one_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_13_one__power2) ).

tff(28,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ord_less_eq_int(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_23_zle__refl) ).

tff(29,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ( number_number_of_int(X) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_24_number__of__is__id) ).

tff(30,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] : ( times_times_int(X,Y) = times_times_int(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_25_zmult__commute) ).

tff(32,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int,Z: int] : ( times_times_int(times_times_int(X,Y),Z) = times_times_int(X,times_times_int(Y,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_30_zmult__assoc) ).

tff(34,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] :
      ( ~ ord_less_eq_int(X,Y)
      | ~ ord_less_eq_int(Y,X)
      | ( X = Y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_32_zle__antisym) ).

tff(72,axiom,
    ! [X: int] :
      ( ord_less_eq_int(bit0(X),pls)
      | ~ ord_less_eq_int(X,pls) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_58_rel__simps_I27_J) ).

tff(74,axiom,
    ! [X: int] :
      ( ord_less_eq_int(pls,bit0(X))
      | ~ ord_less_eq_int(pls,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_59_rel__simps_I21_J) ).

tff(86,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ( times_times_int(pls,X) = pls ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_66_mult__Pls) ).

tff(87,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] : ( times_times_int(bit0(X),Y) = bit0(times_times_int(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_67_mult__Bit0) ).

tff(89,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ( times_times_int(one_one_int,X) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_70_zmult__1) ).

tff(90,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int,Z: int] : ( times_times_int(plus_plus_int(X,Y),Z) = plus_plus_int(times_times_int(X,Z),times_times_int(Y,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_72_zadd__zmult__distrib) ).

tff(91,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int,Z: int] : ( times_times_int(X,plus_plus_int(Y,Z)) = plus_plus_int(times_times_int(X,Y),times_times_int(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_73_zadd__zmult__distrib2) ).

tff(128,axiom,
    zero_zero_int = number_number_of_int(pls),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_105_zero__is__num__zero) ).

tff(129,plain,
    zero_zero_int = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[128,29,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(134,plain,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] : ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(X,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),power_power_int(Y,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls))))),pls),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,129,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(163,plain,
    ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),plus_plus_int(bit0(bit0(times_times_int(bit1(pls),times_times_int(m,pls)))),pls)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3,89,32,90,129,87,29,4,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(175,plain,
    ! [X: int] : ( times_times_int(X,pls) = pls ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[86,30,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(176,plain,
    ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(s,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),plus_plus_int(bit0(bit0(pls)),pls)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[163,175,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(190,plain,
    ord_less_eq_int(bit0(pls),pls),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[72,28]) ).

tff(192,plain,
    ord_less_eq_int(pls,bit0(pls)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[74,28]) ).

tff(357,plain,
    plus_plus_int(pls,pls) = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[86,91,theory(equality)]),86,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(569,plain,
    ! [X: int] : ~ ord_less_int(plus_plus_int(power_power_int(X,number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))),one_one_int),pls),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[134,19,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(845,plain,
    pls = bit0(pls),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[34,192,190]) ).

cnf(846,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[176,569,357,845,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : NUM924_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 20:19:22 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T20:19:22
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n004.cluster.edu at 2022-07-06T20:19:22
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |zprime| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.18/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.18/0.50     |twoSqu1431725154sum2sq| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  #||
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.78  ||#
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.78  ;      2959 formulas have been input or derived (from 135 formulas).
% 0.61/0.78  ;       846 (29%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.61/0.78  ;          153 (18%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.61/0.78  ;          693 (82%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.78  ; 
% 0.61/0.78  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.027   8%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.003   1%   Assert                       (107 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.063  19%   Process new row              (2,378 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.029   9%   Resolution                   (268 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.011   3%   Paramodulation               (134 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (9 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.008   2%   Condensing                   (615 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.039  12%   Forward subsumption          (615 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.007   2%   Backward subsumption         (386 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.008   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,436 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.050  15%   Forward simplification       (2,374 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.010   3%   Backward simplification      (834 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.037  11%   Ordering                     (5,420 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (331 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.034  10%   Other
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.326        Total
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.330        Real time
% 0.61/0.79  ; 
% 0.61/0.79  ; Term-hash-array has 1,333 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 326 entries (343 at peak, 386 added, 60 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,528 nodes (1,700 at peak, 2,023 added, 495 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ;  Retrieved 1,548 possibly forward subsuming rows in 615 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ;  Retrieved 262 possibly backward subsumed rows in 386 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Path-index has 1,177 entries (1,270 at peak, 1,366 added, 189 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Path-index has 2,908 nodes (2,964 at peak, 3,080 added, 172 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Trie-index has 1,177 entries (1,270 at peak, 1,366 added, 189 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Trie-index has 4,906 nodes (5,236 at peak, 5,642 added, 736 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Retrieved 8,237 generalization terms in 14,423 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Retrieved 720 instance terms in 518 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Retrieved 21,805 unifiable terms in 1,754 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; 
% 0.61/0.79  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 69 entries:
% 0.61/0.79  ;    69 with value 0
% 0.61/0.79  ; The agenda of rows to process has 108 entries:
% 0.61/0.79  ;    11 with value 8               1 with value 17               1 with value 25
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value 9               8 with value 18               1 with value 26
% 0.61/0.79  ;     6 with value 10              8 with value 19               1 with value 28
% 0.61/0.79  ;    12 with value 11             17 with value 20               2 with value 30
% 0.61/0.79  ;     3 with value 12              2 with value 21               8 with value 31
% 0.61/0.79  ;     8 with value 13             10 with value 22               2 with value 33
% 0.61/0.79  ;     2 with value 14              4 with value 24
% 0.61/0.79  ; The agenda of rows to give has 562 entries:
% 0.61/0.79  ;     6 with value (4 7)          20 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 36)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    27 with value (4 8)          18 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 37)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    35 with value (4 9)          11 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    19 with value (4 10)         16 with value (4 25)           2 with value (4 40)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    31 with value (4 11)         16 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 41)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    24 with value (4 12)         11 with value (4 27)           3 with value (4 43)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    19 with value (4 13)         14 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 44)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    18 with value (4 14)          9 with value (4 29)           4 with value (4 47)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    37 with value (4 15)          3 with value (4 30)           2 with value (4 50)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    17 with value (4 16)         19 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 52)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    36 with value (4 17)         12 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 53)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    26 with value (4 18)          6 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 57)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    19 with value (4 19)         11 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 67)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    36 with value (4 20)          6 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 71)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    13 with value (4 21)
% 0.61/0.79  Evaluation took:
% 0.61/0.79    0.33 seconds of real time
% 0.61/0.79    0.295357 seconds of user run time
% 0.61/0.79    0.034898 seconds of system run time
% 0.61/0.79    [Run times include 0.009 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.61/0.79    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.61/0.79    0 page faults and
% 0.61/0.79    22,526,512 bytes consed.
% 0.61/0.79  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.79  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T20:19:23
% 0.61/0.79  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.79  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------