TSTP Solution File: NUM907_1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM907_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 03:35:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   8 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  67 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   92 (  36   ~;  34   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  162 (   0 atm; 121 fun;   5 num;  36 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   3 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (  24   !;  12   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: $rat ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    sK1: $rat ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    sK2: $rat ).

tff(f194,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f35,f37,f144,f191,f193]) ).

tff(f193,plain,
    ( spl3_3
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f172,f24,f32]) ).

tff(f32,plain,
    ( spl3_3
  <=> ( sK1 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_3])]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

tff(f172,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f123,f146]) ).

tff(f146,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $rat] : ( $sum(sK2,X0) = $sum(sK0,$sum(X0,sK1)) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f145,f4]) ).

tff(f4,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat,X1: $rat] : ( $sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_135,[]) ).

tff(f145,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $rat] : ( $sum(sK2,X0) = $sum(sK0,$sum(sK1,X0)) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f5,f25]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ! [X2: $rat,X0: $rat,X1: $rat] : ( $sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_136,[]) ).

tff(f123,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat,X1: $rat] : ( $sum(X0,$sum($uminus(X0),X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f110]) ).

tff(f110,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat,X1: $rat] : ( $sum(0/1,X1) = $sum(X0,$sum($uminus(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f5,f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat] : ( 0/1 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_140,[]) ).

tff(f191,plain,
    ( spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f152,f24,f28]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( sK0 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

tff(f152,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f148]) ).

tff(f148,plain,
    ( ( $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) = $sum(sK0,0/1) )
    | ~ spl3_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f145,f8]) ).

tff(f144,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f136,f28,f24]) ).

tff(f136,plain,
    ( ( sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f127]) ).

tff(f127,plain,
    ( ( $sum(sK0,sK1) = $sum(sK2,0/1) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f108,f38]) ).

tff(f38,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat] : ( 0/1 = $sum($uminus(X0),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f8,f14]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: $rat] : ( $uminus($uminus(X0)) = X0 ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_148,[]) ).

tff(f108,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $rat] : ( $sum(sK2,$sum($uminus(sK1),X0)) = $sum(sK0,X0) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f5,f29]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

tff(f37,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f28,f24]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) )
    | ( sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) )
      | ( sK0 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) )
      | ( sK2 != $sum(sK0,sK1) ) )
    & ( ( ( sK1 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) )
        & ( sK0 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) ) )
      | ( sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f17,f18]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
        ( ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) != X1 )
          | ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) != X0 )
          | ( $sum(X0,X1) != X2 ) )
        & ( ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) = X1 )
            & ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) = X0 ) )
          | ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( sK1 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) )
        | ( sK0 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) )
        | ( sK2 != $sum(sK0,sK1) ) )
      & ( ( ( sK1 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) )
          & ( sK0 = $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) ) )
        | ( sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ? [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
      ( ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) != X1 )
        | ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) != X0 )
        | ( $sum(X0,X1) != X2 ) )
      & ( ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) = X1 )
          & ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) = X0 ) )
        | ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ? [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
      ( ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) != X1 )
        | ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) != X0 )
        | ( $sum(X0,X1) != X2 ) )
      & ( ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) = X1 )
          & ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) = X0 ) )
        | ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ? [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
      ( ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 )
    <~> ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) = X1 )
        & ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
        ( ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 )
      <=> ( ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) = X1 )
          & ( $sum(X2,$uminus(X1)) = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
        ( ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 )
      <=> ( ( $difference(X2,X0) = X1 )
          & ( $difference(X2,X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $rat,X1: $rat,X2: $rat] :
      ( ( $sum(X0,X1) = X2 )
    <=> ( ( $difference(X2,X0) = X1 )
        & ( $difference(X2,X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WYWq5Ay2ia/Vampire---4.8_497',rat_combined_problem_2) ).

tff(f35,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2
    | ~ spl3_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f32,f28,f24]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) )
    | ( sK0 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK1)) )
    | ( sK2 != $sum(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : NUM907_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 17:16:02 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  This is a TF0_THM_EQU_ARI problem
% 0.14/0.34  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WYWq5Ay2ia/Vampire---4.8_497
% 0.55/0.73  % (802)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (798)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (797)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (800)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (801)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (799)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)Memory used [KB]: 958
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (796)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % (799)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)Memory used [KB]: 983
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % (796)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.73  % (803)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (804)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.55/0.73  % (798)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (803)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)Memory used [KB]: 956
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (803)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.55/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)Memory used [KB]: 1085
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (798)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Success in time 0.383 s
% 0.55/0.74  terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Lib::SystemFailException'
% 0.55/0.74  792 Aborted by signal SIGABRT on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WYWq5Ay2ia/Vampire---4.8_497
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Termination phase: Unknown
% 0.55/0.74  
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Memory used [KB]: 438
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Time elapsed: 0.384 s
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)Instructions burned: 952 (million)
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  % (792)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74  Version : Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.55/0.74  ???
% 0.55/0.74   ???
% 0.55/0.74    ???
% 0.55/0.74     ???
% 0.55/0.74      ???
% 0.55/0.74       ???
% 0.55/0.74        ???
% 0.55/0.74         ???
% 0.55/0.74          ???
% 0.55/0.74           ???
% 0.55/0.74            ???
% 0.55/0.74             ???
% 0.55/0.74              ???
% 0.55/0.74               ???
% 0.55/0.74                ???
% 0.55/0.74                 ???
% 0.55/0.74                  ???
% 0.55/0.74                   ???
% 0.55/0.74                    ???
% 0.55/0.74                     ???
% 0.55/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------