TSTP Solution File: NUM895_1 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : NUM895_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:33:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.46s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : NUM895_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 13:09:52 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.46/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.46/1.19 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.46/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.46/1.19 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Parsing...
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 clauses 14
% 1.46/1.19 conjectures 2
% 1.46/1.19 EPR 4
% 1.46/1.19 Horn 12
% 1.46/1.19 unary 10
% 1.46/1.19 binary 2
% 1.46/1.19 lits 20
% 1.46/1.19 lits eq 9
% 1.46/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 1.46/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.46/1.19 fd_cond 0
% 1.46/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 1.46/1.19 AC symbols 1
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------
% 1.46/1.19 Current options:
% 1.46/1.19 ------
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.46/1.19 ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = X2 => $difference(X2,X0) = X1)),
% 1.46/1.19 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_difference)).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.46/1.19 ~! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = X2 => $difference(X2,X0) = X1)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f3,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ~! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = X2 => $sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) = X1)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f4,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_138,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f5,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,$sum(X1,X2)) = $sum($sum(X0,X1),X2)) )),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_139,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f6,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $int] : ($sum(X0,0) = X0) )),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_140,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f7,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($uminus($sum(X0,X1)) = $sum($uminus(X1),$uminus(X0))) )),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_142,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f8,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $int] : (0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0))) )),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_143,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f14,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ( ! [X0 : $int] : ($uminus($uminus(X0)) = X0) )),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(theory_axiom_151,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f16,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) != X1 & $sum(X0,X1) = X2)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f17,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int,X2 : $int] : ($sum(X2,$uminus(X0)) != X1 & $sum(X0,X1) = X2) => (sK1 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) & sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1))),
% 1.46/1.19 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f18,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 sK1 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0)) & sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f16,f17])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f19,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 sK2 = $sum(sK0,sK1)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 tff(f20,plain,(
% 1.46/1.19 sK1 != $sum(sK2,$uminus(sK0))),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_50,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($uminus_int($uminus_int(X0_3)) = X0_3),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_56,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,$uminus_int(X0_3)) = 0),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_57,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int($uminus_int(X0_3),$uminus_int(X1_3)) = $uminus_int($sum_int(X1_3,X0_3))),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_58,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,0) = X0_3),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_59,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3),X2_3) = $sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3))),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_60,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3) = $sum_int(X1_3,X0_3)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(sK2,$uminus_int(sK0)) != sK1),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(sK0,sK1) = sK2),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_479,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,X2_3)) = $sum_int(X1_3,$sum_int(X0_3,X2_3))),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_60])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_491,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,$uminus_int(X0_3))) = $sum_int(X1_3,0)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_479])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_696,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,$sum_int(X1_3,$uminus_int(X0_3))) = X1_3),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_491,c_58])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_732,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($uminus_int($sum_int(X0_3,$uminus_int(X1_3))) = $sum_int(X1_3,$uminus_int(X0_3))),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_57])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_741,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(X0_3,$uminus_int($sum_int(X0_3,X1_3))) = $uminus_int(X1_3)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_696])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_3888,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(sK0,$uminus_int(sK2)) = $uminus_int(sK1)),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_741])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_4188,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($sum_int(sK2,$uminus_int(sK0)) = $uminus_int($uminus_int(sK1))),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3888,c_732])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_4192,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($uminus_int($uminus_int(sK1)) != sK1),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_4188])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 cnf(c_4193,plain,
% 1.46/1.19 ($false),
% 1.46/1.19 inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4192,c_50])).
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.19
% 1.46/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------