TSTP Solution File: NUM877_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : NUM877_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.99s 1.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 2 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 14 ( 0 atm; 3 fun; 3 num; 8 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 (; 4 !; 4 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(f_32,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [Xa: $int,Ya: $int] :
( ( $difference(Xa,Ya) = 0 )
=> ( Xa = Ya ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diff_identity) ).
tff(f_110,plain,
? [Xa: $int,Ya: $int] :
( ( $difference(Xa,Ya) = 0 )
& ( Xa != Ya ) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).
tff(f_113,plain,
! [Xa: $int,Ya: $int] :
( ? [Xa: $int,Ya: $int] :
( ( $difference(Xa,Ya) = 0 )
& ( Xa != Ya ) )
<=> $false ),
inference(theorem,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],]) ).
tff(f_114,plain,
$false,
inference(equivalence,[status(thm)],[f_110,f_113]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
$false,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_114]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : NUM877_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.19/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 14:46:17 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.99/1.51 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.99/1.51
% 1.99/1.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.99/1.55
% 1.99/1.55 Inference rules
% 1.99/1.55 ----------------------
% 1.99/1.55 #Ref : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Sup : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Fact : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Define : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Split : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Chain : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Close : 0
% 1.99/1.55
% 1.99/1.55 Ordering : LPO
% 1.99/1.55
% 1.99/1.55 Simplification rules
% 1.99/1.55 ----------------------
% 1.99/1.55 #Subsume : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Demod : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Tautology : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 1.99/1.55 #BackRed : 0
% 1.99/1.55
% 1.99/1.55 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 1.99/1.55 #Strategies tried : 1
% 1.99/1.55
% 1.99/1.55 Timing (in seconds)
% 1.99/1.55 ----------------------
% 1.99/1.56 Preprocessing : 0.44
% 1.99/1.56 Parsing : 0.25
% 1.99/1.56 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 1.99/1.56 Main loop : 0.03
% 1.99/1.56 Inferencing : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 Reduction : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 Demodulation : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 BG Simplification : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 Subsumption : 0.02
% 1.99/1.56 Abstraction : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 MUC search : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 Cooper : 0.03
% 1.99/1.56 Total : 0.53
% 1.99/1.56 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 Index Matching : 0.00
% 1.99/1.56 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------