TSTP Solution File: NUM855+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM855+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:31:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.82s 2.01s
% Output   : Refutation 1.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : NUM855+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 02:54:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.82/2.01  
% 1.82/2.01  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.82/2.01  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.82/2.01  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.82/2.01  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.82/2.01  SPASS derived 6559 clauses, backtracked 7 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 2882 clauses.
% 1.82/2.01  SPASS allocated 90250 KBytes.
% 1.82/2.01  SPASS spent	0:00:01.62 on the problem.
% 1.82/2.01  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.82/2.01  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.82/2.01  		0:00:00.05 for inferences.
% 1.82/2.01  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.82/2.01  		0:00:01.45 for the reduction.
% 1.82/2.01  
% 1.82/2.01  
% 1.82/2.01  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 22 :
% 1.82/2.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.82/2.01  17[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd512,vd509))*.
% 1.82/2.01  19[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511))*.
% 1.82/2.01  21[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vmul(u,v),vmul(v,u))*.
% 1.82/2.01  30[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* -> less(v,u).
% 1.82/2.01  32[0:Inp] || greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512))* -> .
% 1.82/2.01  33[0:Inp] || less(u,v) greater(u,v)* -> .
% 1.82/2.01  37[0:Inp] ||  -> less(u,v) greater(u,v)* equal(u,v).
% 1.82/2.01  62[0:Inp] || less(u,v)* less(v,w)* -> less(u,w)*.
% 1.82/2.01  74[0:Rew:21.0,19.0] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd511,vd509))*.
% 1.82/2.01  75[0:Rew:21.0,17.0] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd509,vd512))*.
% 1.82/2.01  81[0:Res:37.1,32.0] ||  -> less(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512))*r equal(vmul(vd509,vd512),vmul(vd508,vd511)).
% 1.82/2.01  86[1:Spt:81.1] ||  -> equal(vmul(vd509,vd512),vmul(vd508,vd511))**.
% 1.82/2.01  87[1:Rew:86.0,75.0] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd508,vd511))*.
% 1.82/2.01  1195[0:Res:74.0,30.0] ||  -> less(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd508,vd511))*l.
% 1.82/2.01  1449[0:Res:74.0,33.1] || less(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd511,vd509))*r -> .
% 1.82/2.01  1450[1:Res:87.0,33.1] || less(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd508,vd511))*l -> .
% 1.82/2.01  1493[1:MRR:1450.0,1195.0] ||  -> .
% 1.82/2.01  1494[1:Spt:1493.0,81.1,86.0] || equal(vmul(vd509,vd512),vmul(vd508,vd511))** -> .
% 1.82/2.01  1495[1:Spt:1493.0,81.0] ||  -> less(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512))*r.
% 1.82/2.01  1500[0:Res:75.0,30.0] ||  -> less(vmul(vd509,vd512),vmul(vd511,vd509))*l.
% 1.82/2.01  7691[1:OCh:62.1,62.0,1500.0,1495.0] ||  -> less(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd511,vd509))*r.
% 1.82/2.01  7703[1:MRR:7691.0,1449.0] ||  -> .
% 1.82/2.01  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.82/2.01  Formulae used in the proof : holds_a40_conjunct2_a40_315_a41__a44__a32_515_a44__a32_1_a41_ holds_a40_conjunct1_a40_315_a41__a44__a32_514_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_270_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_140_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ holds_a40_conseq_conjunct2_a40_315_a41__a44__a32_516_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_2_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_168_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_
% 1.82/2.01  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------