TSTP Solution File: NUM855+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : NUM855+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n070.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 15:22:31 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  23   ~;  17   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(8,axiom,
    ! [X11,X12] : equal(vplus(X12,X11),vplus(X11,X12)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof(12,conjecture,
    greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conseq_conjunct2(315), 516, 0)') ).

fof(13,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22] : equal(vmul(X21,X22),vmul(X22,X21)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

fof(18,axiom,
    greater(vd511,vd512),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conjunct2(314), 513, 0)') ).

fof(20,axiom,
    ! [X34,X35,X36] :
      ( greater(vplus(X34,X36),vplus(X35,X36))
     => greater(X34,X35) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(goal(202), 0), 2)') ).

fof(26,axiom,
    ! [X49,X50,X51] :
      ( greater(X50,X51)
     => greater(vmul(X50,X49),vmul(X51,X49)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(299, 0), 2)') ).

fof(29,axiom,
    greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conjunct1(315), 514, 0)') ).

fof(35,axiom,
    ! [X71,X72,X73,X74] :
      ( ( greater(X73,X74)
        & greater(X71,X72) )
     => greater(vplus(X71,X73),vplus(X72,X74)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(209, 0), 0)') ).

fof(45,axiom,
    equal(vmul(vd509,vd511),vmul(vd511,vd509)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conjunct2(315), 515, 0)') ).

fof(46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12]) ).

fof(47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[46,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(63,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] : equal(vplus(X14,X13),vplus(X13,X14)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[63]) ).

cnf(74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd512)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[47]) ).

fof(75,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] : equal(vmul(X23,X24),vmul(X24,X23)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

cnf(89,plain,
    greater(vd511,vd512),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

fof(96,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36] :
      ( ~ greater(vplus(X34,X36),vplus(X35,X36))
      | greater(X34,X35) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

fof(97,plain,
    ! [X37,X38,X39] :
      ( ~ greater(vplus(X37,X39),vplus(X38,X39))
      | greater(X37,X38) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[96]) ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(vplus(X1,X3),vplus(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[97]) ).

fof(112,plain,
    ! [X49,X50,X51] :
      ( ~ greater(X50,X51)
      | greater(vmul(X50,X49),vmul(X51,X49)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

fof(113,plain,
    ! [X52,X53,X54] :
      ( ~ greater(X53,X54)
      | greater(vmul(X53,X52),vmul(X54,X52)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[112]) ).

cnf(114,plain,
    ( greater(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X3,X2))
    | ~ greater(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[113]) ).

cnf(120,plain,
    greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

fof(139,plain,
    ! [X71,X72,X73,X74] :
      ( ~ greater(X73,X74)
      | ~ greater(X71,X72)
      | greater(vplus(X71,X73),vplus(X72,X74)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

fof(140,plain,
    ! [X75,X76,X77,X78] :
      ( ~ greater(X77,X78)
      | ~ greater(X75,X76)
      | greater(vplus(X75,X77),vplus(X76,X78)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[139]) ).

cnf(141,plain,
    ( greater(vplus(X1,X2),vplus(X3,X4))
    | ~ greater(X1,X3)
    | ~ greater(X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[140]) ).

cnf(167,plain,
    vmul(vd509,vd511) = vmul(vd511,vd509),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

cnf(178,plain,
    greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd511,vd509)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[120,167,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(185,plain,
    greater(vmul(vd511,vd508),vmul(vd511,vd509)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[178,76,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(204,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd511,vd508),vmul(vd509,vd512)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[74,76,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(223,plain,
    ( greater(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X2,X3))
    | ~ greater(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[114,76,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(276,plain,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(vplus(X3,X1),vplus(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[98,64,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1974,plain,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X1,X3)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[276,141,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2006,plain,
    ( greater(vmul(vd511,vd508),X1)
    | ~ greater(vmul(vd511,vd509),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1974,185,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2110,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd509,vd512)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[204,2006,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3695,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vd511,vd512),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2110,223,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3697,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3695,89,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3698,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[3697,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3699,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    3698,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM855+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n070.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 14:56:33 CST 2018
% 0.06/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.27  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.27  --creating new selector for []
% 0.06/0.39  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.39  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp6z3P22/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.39  -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.39  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.39  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.39  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.39  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.39  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.39  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------