TSTP Solution File: NUM854+2 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : NUM854+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:46:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : NUM854+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 23:50:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectCQIPrecW.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37  # Number of axioms: 29 Number of unprocessed: 28
% 0.13/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.37  # 28 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.37  # Found 16 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.37  # 12 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.37  # 16 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.38  # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (greater(vd508,vd509))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (greater(vd511,vd512))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (vmul(X1,v1)=X1)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (vmul(v1,X1)=X1)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greater(vplus(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (vmul(vmul(X1,X2),X3)=vmul(X1,vmul(X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (less(X1,vplus(X1,X2)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (vplus(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X1,X3))=vmul(X1,vplus(X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (vmul(X1,X2)=vmul(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (vmul(X1,vsucc(X2))=vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (vmul(vsucc(X1),X2)=vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~greater(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~less(X1,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (vplus(X1,X2)!=X1)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3)!=X1)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~greater(vmul(vd511,vd508),vmul(vd511,vd509)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (~less(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|vmul(X1,X3)!=vmul(X2,X3))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(vmul(X1,X3),vmul(X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (greater(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X3,X2))|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~less(vmul(X1,X3),vmul(X2,X3)))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (vplus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))=X2|~less(X1,X2))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (vplus(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2))=X2|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (less(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X3,X2))|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (vplus(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1))=X2|vplus(X2,esk4_2(X2,X1))=X1|X2=X1)).
% 0.13/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.38  # Found 5 steps
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (~greater(vmul(vd511,vd508),vmul(vd511,vd509))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~greater(vmul(vd511,vd508),vmul(vd511,vd509))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (less(vmul(vd511,vd508),vmul(vd511,vd509))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (vmul(vd511,vd509)=vmul(vd511,vd508)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_53, ...])).
% 0.13/0.38  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (greater(vmul(vd511,vd509),vmul(vd511,vd508))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])).
% 0.13/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.38  # Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.38  # We now have 3 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.38  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.13/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------