TSTP Solution File: NUM854+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM854+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:37:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(conjunct1(315), 514, 0)',conjecture,
    greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(conjunct1(315), 514, 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(299, 0), 2)',axiom,
    ! [X10,X15,X16] :
      ( greater(X15,X16)
     => greater(vmul(X15,X10),vmul(X16,X10)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(299, 0), 2)') ).

fof('holds(conjunct1(314), 510, 0)',axiom,
    greater(vd508,vd509),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(conjunct1(314), 510, 0)') ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(conjunct1(315), 514, 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19] :
      ( ~ greater(X18,X19)
      | greater(vmul(X18,X17),vmul(X19,X17)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(299, 0), 2)'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd508,vd511),vmul(vd509,vd511)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( greater(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X3,X2))
    | ~ greater(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    greater(vd508,vd509),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(conjunct1(314), 510, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : NUM854+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 05:11:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 6
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 59
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 60
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 57
% 0.22/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.22/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.22/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 60
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 32
% 0.22/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 53
% 0.22/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.22/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.22/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.22/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 105
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.22/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 17
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3360
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2888 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------