TSTP Solution File: NUM853+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM853+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:31:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.73s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUM853+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 15:11:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.73/0.91  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.73/0.91  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.73/0.91  SPASS derived 2521 clauses, backtracked 8 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 1232 clauses.
% 0.73/0.91  SPASS allocated 87230 KBytes.
% 0.73/0.91  SPASS spent	0:00:00.55 on the problem.
% 0.73/0.91  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.73/0.91  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.73/0.91  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 0.73/0.91  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.73/0.91  		0:00:00.42 for the reduction.
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  
% 0.73/0.91  Here is a proof with depth 10, length 28 :
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.73/0.91  2[0:Inp] || greater(vd486,vd488)* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  4[0:Inp] || greater(u,u)* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  7[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,v),u)*.
% 0.73/0.91  15[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd486,vd487),vmul(vd488,vd487))*.
% 0.73/0.91  25[0:Inp] || less(u,v) -> greater(v,u)*.
% 0.73/0.91  27[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vplus(u,v),vplus(v,u))*.
% 0.73/0.91  32[0:Inp] ||  -> less(u,v) greater(u,v)* equal(u,v).
% 0.73/0.91  44[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater(vmul(u,w),vmul(v,w))*.
% 0.73/0.91  56[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> equal(vplus(v,skf5(v,u)),u)**.
% 0.73/0.91  58[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vplus(vplus(u,v),w),vplus(u,vplus(v,w)))**.
% 0.73/0.91  70[0:Res:25.1,2.0] || less(vd488,vd486)*l -> .
% 0.73/0.91  71[0:Res:32.1,2.0] ||  -> less(vd486,vd488)*r equal(vd488,vd486).
% 0.73/0.91  75[1:Spt:71.1] ||  -> equal(vd488,vd486)**.
% 0.73/0.91  79[1:Rew:75.0,15.0] ||  -> greater(vmul(vd486,vd487),vmul(vd486,vd487))*.
% 0.73/0.91  81[1:MRR:79.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.73/0.91  82[1:Spt:81.0,71.1,75.0] || equal(vd488,vd486)** -> .
% 0.73/0.91  83[1:Spt:81.0,71.0] ||  -> less(vd486,vd488)*r.
% 0.73/0.91  98[0:SpR:27.0,7.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,v),v)*.
% 0.73/0.91  402[0:SpR:58.0,98.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,vplus(v,w)),w)*.
% 0.73/0.91  450[0:SpR:27.0,402.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,vplus(v,w)),v)*.
% 0.73/0.91  476[0:SpR:56.1,450.0] || greater(u,v) -> greater(vplus(w,u),v)*.
% 0.73/0.91  2575[0:Res:476.1,4.0] || greater(u,vplus(v,u))* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  2649[0:SpL:27.0,2575.0] || greater(u,vplus(u,v))* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  2680[0:SpL:56.1,2649.0] || greater(u,v)*+ greater(v,u)* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  3071[0:Res:15.0,2680.0] || greater(vmul(vd488,vd487),vmul(vd486,vd487))* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  3096[0:Res:44.1,3071.0] || greater(vd488,vd486)* -> .
% 0.73/0.91  3099[0:Res:32.1,3096.0] ||  -> less(vd488,vd486)*l equal(vd488,vd486).
% 0.73/0.91  3101[1:MRR:3099.0,3099.1,70.0,82.0] ||  -> .
% 0.73/0.91  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.73/0.91  Formulae used in the proof : holds_a40_conseq_a40_307_a41__a44__a32_490_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_3_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_189_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ holds_a40_antec_a40_307_a41__a44__a32_489_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_147_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_61_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_299_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_2_a41_ def_a40_cond_a40_conseq_a40_axiom_a40_3_a41__a41__a44__a32_11_a41__a44__a32_1_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_33_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_
% 0.73/0.91  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------