TSTP Solution File: NUM853+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM853+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:50:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 12.47s 2.52s
% Output   : Proof 18.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM853+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 16:19:02 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.63  ________       _____
% 0.22/0.63  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.63  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.22/0.63  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.22/0.63  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.63  (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.63  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.63                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.63  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.64  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.15/1.19  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.15/1.19  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.66/1.23  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.66/1.23  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.66/1.23  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.66/1.23  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.66/1.23  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 7.38/1.77  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.25/1.87  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.25/1.87  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.25/1.88  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.25/1.90  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.25/1.91  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.25/1.92  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 8.99/2.00  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.99/2.03  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 8.99/2.04  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 10.68/2.21  Prover 3: gave up
% 10.68/2.21  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.68/2.24  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 11.14/2.31  Prover 1: gave up
% 11.14/2.31  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 11.90/2.38  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 12.18/2.42  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.47/2.45  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.47/2.51  Prover 0: proved (1860ms)
% 12.47/2.51  
% 12.47/2.52  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.47/2.52  
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 2: stopped
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 6: stopped
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 5: stopped
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 12.47/2.52  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 13.22/2.54  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.22/2.57  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 13.22/2.57  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.22/2.58  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 13.72/2.60  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 13.72/2.60  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 14.18/2.72  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.18/2.73  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.18/2.75  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.91/2.76  Prover 8: gave up
% 14.91/2.78  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 14.91/2.79  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.17/2.84  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 15.17/2.85  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 15.17/2.86  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.17/2.92  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 15.17/2.93  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.57/3.01  Prover 10: gave up
% 17.03/3.08  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 17.03/3.10  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 4: Found proof (size 64)
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 4: proved (2485ms)
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 11: stopped
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 7: stopped
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 13: stopped
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 16: stopped
% 17.03/3.15  Prover 19: stopped
% 17.03/3.15  
% 17.03/3.15  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.03/3.15  
% 17.70/3.16  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 17.70/3.17  Assumptions after simplification:
% 17.70/3.17  ---------------------------------
% 17.70/3.17  
% 17.70/3.17    (ass(cond(140, 0), 0))
% 17.70/3.19     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (less(v1, v0) = v2) | 
% 17.70/3.19      ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v3))
% 17.70/3.19    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 17.70/3.19      $i(v0) | less(v1, v0) = 0)
% 17.70/3.19  
% 17.70/3.19    (ass(cond(270, 0), 0))
% 17.70/3.19     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (vmul(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 17.70/3.19      |  ~ $i(v0) | (vmul(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 17.70/3.19    [v2: $i] : ( ~ (vmul(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (vmul(v1, v0) =
% 17.70/3.19        v2 & $i(v2)))
% 17.70/3.19  
% 17.70/3.19    (ass(cond(299, 0), 0))
% 17.70/3.20     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 17.70/3.20      int] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (less(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (vmul(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~
% 17.70/3.20      (vmul(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: int] : ( ~
% 17.70/3.20        (v6 = 0) & less(v1, v2) = v6))
% 17.70/3.20  
% 17.70/3.20    (ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0))
% 17.87/3.20     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (less(v0,
% 17.87/3.20          v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | greater(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0: $i] :
% 17.87/3.20     ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) | 
% 17.87/3.20      ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | less(v0, v1) = 0)
% 17.87/3.20  
% 17.87/3.20    (ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2))
% 17.87/3.20     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (less(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 17.87/3.20      ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 17.87/3.20      $i] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~
% 17.87/3.20        (v2 = 0) & less(v0, v1) = v2))
% 17.87/3.20  
% 17.87/3.20    (ass(cond(goal(177), 0), 0))
% 17.87/3.22     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 =
% 17.87/3.22      0 |  ~ (leq(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |
% 17.87/3.22       ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (leq(v0, v1) = v6 &
% 17.87/3.22        less(v1, v2) = v5 & less(v0, v1) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & ( ~
% 17.87/3.22          (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 17.87/3.22    [v3: any] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (less(v0, v2)
% 17.87/3.22        = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : 
% 17.87/3.22      ? [v7: any] : (leq(v1, v2) = v6 & less(v1, v2) = v5 & less(v0, v1) = v7 & (
% 17.87/3.22          ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 17.87/3.22    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~
% 17.87/3.22      (less(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 17.87/3.22      $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (leq(v1, v2) = v6 &
% 17.87/3.22        leq(v0, v1) = v5 & less(v0, v1) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & ( ~
% 17.87/3.22          (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 17.87/3.22    [v3: any] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (less(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (less(v0, v1)
% 17.87/3.22        = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : 
% 17.87/3.22      ? [v7: any] : (leq(v1, v2) = v7 & leq(v0, v1) = v6 & less(v1, v2) = v5 & ( ~
% 17.87/3.22          (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 17.87/3.22    ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: any] : ( ~ (leq(v1, v2) =
% 17.87/3.22        v4) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5:
% 17.87/3.22        any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (less(v1, v2) = v5 & less(v0, v2) =
% 17.87/3.22        v7 & less(v0, v1) = v6 & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)) & ( ~ (v5
% 17.87/3.22                = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 17.87/3.22    :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: any] : ( ~ (leq(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less(v0, v1) =
% 17.87/3.22        v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ?
% 17.87/3.22      [v7: any] : (leq(v0, v1) = v6 & less(v1, v2) = v5 & less(v0, v2) = v7 & (v7
% 17.87/3.22          = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))))) & 
% 17.87/3.22    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: any] : ( ~
% 17.87/3.22      (leq(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (less(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 17.87/3.22      $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (leq(v1, v2) = v5 &
% 17.87/3.22        less(v0, v2) = v7 & less(v0, v1) = v6 & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 =
% 17.87/3.22                0)) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 17.87/3.22    :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: any] : ( ~ (less(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 17.87/3.22      (less(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ?
% 17.87/3.22      [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (leq(v1, v2) = v6 & leq(v0, v1) = v5 & less(v0,
% 17.87/3.22          v2) = v7 & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~
% 17.87/3.22              (v3 = 0))))))
% 17.87/3.22  
% 17.87/3.22    (holds(antec(307), 489, 0))
% 17.87/3.22    $i(vd487) & $i(vd488) & $i(vd486) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (vmul(vd488,
% 17.87/3.22        vd487) = v1 & vmul(vd486, vd487) = v0 & greater(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v1) &
% 17.87/3.22      $i(v0))
% 17.87/3.22  
% 17.87/3.22    (holds(conseq(307), 490, 0))
% 17.87/3.22    $i(vd488) & $i(vd486) &  ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(vd486, vd488) =
% 17.87/3.22      v0)
% 17.87/3.22  
% 17.87/3.22    (function-axioms)
% 17.87/3.22     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 17.87/3.22    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 17.87/3.22      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 17.87/3.22    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 17.87/3.22    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 17.87/3.22      (vplus(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 17.87/3.22      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less(v3, v2)
% 17.87/3.22        = v1) |  ~ (less(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 17.87/3.22    :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 17.87/3.22    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 17.87/3.22      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 17.87/3.22    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vskolem2(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 17.87/3.22      (vskolem2(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 17.87/3.22      ~ (vsucc(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vsucc(v2) = v0))
% 17.87/3.22  
% 17.87/3.22  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 17.87/3.22  --------------------------------------------
% 17.87/3.22  ass(cond(12, 0), 0), ass(cond(147, 0), 0), ass(cond(158, 0), 0), ass(cond(163,
% 17.87/3.22      0), 0), ass(cond(168, 0), 0), ass(cond(184, 0), 0), ass(cond(189, 0), 0),
% 17.87/3.22  ass(cond(20, 0), 0), ass(cond(209, 0), 0), ass(cond(223, 0), 0), ass(cond(228,
% 17.87/3.22      0), 0), ass(cond(234, 0), 0), ass(cond(241, 0), 0), ass(cond(253, 0), 0),
% 17.87/3.22  ass(cond(261, 0), 0), ass(cond(281, 0), 0), ass(cond(290, 0), 0), ass(cond(299,
% 17.87/3.22      0), 1), ass(cond(299, 0), 2), ass(cond(33, 0), 0), ass(cond(43, 0), 0),
% 17.87/3.22  ass(cond(52, 0), 0), ass(cond(6, 0), 0), ass(cond(61, 0), 0), ass(cond(73, 0),
% 17.87/3.22    0), ass(cond(81, 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1), ass(cond(goal(130), 0),
% 17.87/3.22    3), ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 1),
% 17.87/3.22  ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 2), ass(cond(goal(202), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(202), 0),
% 17.87/3.22    1), ass(cond(goal(202), 0), 2), ass(cond(goal(216), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(88),
% 17.87/3.22      0), 0), ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 1), ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 2),
% 17.87/3.22  ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 3), def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1),
% 17.87/3.22  def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1), def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 16), 1),
% 17.87/3.22  def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 17), 1), qu(antec(axiom(3)), imp(antec(axiom(3)))),
% 17.87/3.22  qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0),
% 17.87/3.22      holds(definiens(29), 44, 0))), qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32),
% 17.87/3.22    and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0))),
% 17.87/3.22  qu(restrictor(axiom(1)), holds(scope(axiom(1)), 2, 0))
% 17.87/3.22  
% 17.87/3.22  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 17.87/3.22  ---------------------------------
% 17.87/3.22  
% 17.87/3.22  Begin of proof
% 17.87/3.22  | 
% 17.87/3.22  | ALPHA: (holds(antec(307), 489, 0)) implies:
% 17.87/3.23  |   (1)  $i(vd487)
% 17.87/3.23  |   (2)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (vmul(vd488, vd487) = v1 & vmul(vd486,
% 17.87/3.23  |            vd487) = v0 & greater(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 17.87/3.23  | 
% 17.87/3.23  | ALPHA: (ass(cond(270, 0), 0)) implies:
% 17.87/3.23  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (vmul(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~
% 17.87/3.23  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (vmul(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 17.87/3.23  | 
% 17.87/3.23  | ALPHA: (ass(cond(goal(177), 0), 0)) implies:
% 17.87/3.23  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: any] :
% 17.87/3.23  |        ( ~ (less(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 17.87/3.23  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] :
% 17.87/3.23  |          (leq(v1, v2) = v6 & leq(v0, v1) = v5 & less(v0, v2) = v7 & (v7 = 0 |
% 17.87/3.23  |              (( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))))
% 17.87/3.23  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 17.87/3.23  |        (v4 = 0 |  ~ (less(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (less(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |
% 17.87/3.23  |           ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] :
% 17.87/3.23  |          (leq(v1, v2) = v6 & leq(v0, v1) = v5 & less(v0, v1) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 =
% 17.87/3.23  |                0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 17.87/3.23  | 
% 17.87/3.23  | ALPHA: (ass(cond(140, 0), 0)) implies:
% 17.87/3.23  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 17.87/3.23  |          $i(v0) | less(v1, v0) = 0)
% 17.87/3.23  | 
% 17.87/3.23  | ALPHA: (ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)) implies:
% 17.87/3.23  |   (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~
% 17.87/3.23  |          (greater(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | less(v0, v1) = 0)
% 17.87/3.23  | 
% 17.87/3.23  | ALPHA: (ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)) implies:
% 17.87/3.23  |   (8)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 17.87/3.23  |          $i(v0) |  ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & less(v0, v1) = v2))
% 17.87/3.23  | 
% 17.87/3.23  | ALPHA: (holds(conseq(307), 490, 0)) implies:
% 18.04/3.23  |   (9)  $i(vd486)
% 18.04/3.23  |   (10)  $i(vd488)
% 18.04/3.23  |   (11)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(vd486, vd488) = v0)
% 18.04/3.23  | 
% 18.04/3.23  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 18.04/3.23  |   (12)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 18.04/3.23  |           (vmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v0))
% 18.04/3.23  |   (13)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 18.04/3.23  |         :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (less(v3, v2) =
% 18.04/3.23  |             v0))
% 18.04/3.23  | 
% 18.04/3.23  | DELTA: instantiating (11) with fresh symbol all_53_0 gives:
% 18.04/3.23  |   (14)   ~ (all_53_0 = 0) & greater(vd486, vd488) = all_53_0
% 18.04/3.23  | 
% 18.04/3.23  | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 18.04/3.23  |   (15)   ~ (all_53_0 = 0)
% 18.04/3.23  |   (16)  greater(vd486, vd488) = all_53_0
% 18.04/3.23  | 
% 18.04/3.23  | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_55_0, all_55_1 gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (17)  vmul(vd488, vd487) = all_55_0 & vmul(vd486, vd487) = all_55_1 &
% 18.04/3.24  |         greater(all_55_1, all_55_0) = 0 & $i(all_55_0) & $i(all_55_1)
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | ALPHA: (17) implies:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (18)  $i(all_55_1)
% 18.04/3.24  |   (19)  $i(all_55_0)
% 18.04/3.24  |   (20)  greater(all_55_1, all_55_0) = 0
% 18.04/3.24  |   (21)  vmul(vd486, vd487) = all_55_1
% 18.04/3.24  |   (22)  vmul(vd488, vd487) = all_55_0
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with vd486, vd488, all_53_0, simplifying with
% 18.04/3.24  |              (9), (10), (16) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (23)  all_53_0 = 0 | vd488 = vd486 | less(vd486, vd488) = 0
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_55_1, all_55_0, simplifying with (18),
% 18.04/3.24  |              (19), (20) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (24)  less(all_55_0, all_55_1) = 0
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_55_1, all_55_0, simplifying with (18),
% 18.04/3.24  |              (19), (20) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (25)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less(all_55_1, all_55_0) = v0)
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with vd487, vd486, all_55_1, simplifying with
% 18.04/3.24  |              (1), (9), (21) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (26)  vmul(vd487, vd486) = all_55_1 & $i(all_55_1)
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (27)  vmul(vd487, vd486) = all_55_1
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with vd487, vd488, all_55_0, simplifying with
% 18.04/3.24  |              (1), (10), (22) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (28)  vmul(vd487, vd488) = all_55_0 & $i(all_55_0)
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (29)  vmul(vd487, vd488) = all_55_0
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | DELTA: instantiating (25) with fresh symbol all_66_0 gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (30)   ~ (all_66_0 = 0) & less(all_55_1, all_55_0) = all_66_0
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (31)   ~ (all_66_0 = 0)
% 18.04/3.24  |   (32)  less(all_55_1, all_55_0) = all_66_0
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ass(cond(299, 0), 0)) with vd487, vd486, vd488,
% 18.04/3.24  |              all_55_1, all_55_0, all_66_0, simplifying with (1), (9), (10),
% 18.04/3.24  |              (21), (22), (32) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (33)  all_66_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less(vd486, vd488) = v0)
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_55_1, all_55_1, all_55_0, all_66_0,
% 18.04/3.24  |              all_66_0, simplifying with (18), (19), (32) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (34)  all_66_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2:
% 18.04/3.24  |           any] : (leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) = v1 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_1) = v0
% 18.04/3.24  |           & less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0)))
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.24  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_55_1, all_55_0, all_55_1, 0, all_66_0,
% 18.04/3.24  |              simplifying with (18), (19), (24), (32) gives:
% 18.04/3.24  |   (35)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] : (leq(all_55_0, all_55_1)
% 18.04/3.24  |           = v1 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) = v0 & less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = v2
% 18.04/3.24  |           & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (all_66_0 = 0)))))
% 18.04/3.24  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_55_0, all_55_1, all_55_0, all_66_0, 0,
% 18.04/3.25  |              simplifying with (18), (19), (24), (32) gives:
% 18.04/3.25  |   (36)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] : (leq(all_55_0, all_55_1)
% 18.04/3.25  |           = v0 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) = v1 & less(all_55_0, all_55_0) = v2
% 18.04/3.25  |           & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) |  ~ (all_66_0 = 0)))))
% 18.04/3.25  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbols all_152_0, all_152_1, all_152_2
% 18.04/3.25  |        gives:
% 18.04/3.25  |   (37)  leq(all_55_0, all_55_1) = all_152_2 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) =
% 18.04/3.25  |         all_152_1 & less(all_55_0, all_55_0) = all_152_0 & (all_152_0 = 0 | (
% 18.04/3.25  |             ~ (all_152_1 = 0) & ( ~ (all_152_2 = 0) |  ~ (all_66_0 = 0))))
% 18.04/3.25  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 18.04/3.25  |   (38)  less(all_55_0, all_55_0) = all_152_0
% 18.04/3.25  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | DELTA: instantiating (35) with fresh symbols all_154_0, all_154_1, all_154_2
% 18.04/3.25  |        gives:
% 18.04/3.25  |   (39)  leq(all_55_0, all_55_1) = all_154_1 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) =
% 18.04/3.25  |         all_154_2 & less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = all_154_0 & (all_154_0 = 0 | (
% 18.04/3.25  |             ~ (all_154_2 = 0) & ( ~ (all_154_1 = 0) |  ~ (all_66_0 = 0))))
% 18.04/3.25  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | ALPHA: (39) implies:
% 18.04/3.25  |   (40)  less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = all_154_0
% 18.04/3.25  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | 
% 18.04/3.25  | Case 1:
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | |   (41)  all_66_0 = 0
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | REDUCE: (31), (41) imply:
% 18.04/3.25  | |   (42)  $false
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | CLOSE: (42) is inconsistent.
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | Case 2:
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | |   (43)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & less(vd486, vd488) = v0)
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | DELTA: instantiating (43) with fresh symbol all_160_0 gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | |   (44)   ~ (all_160_0 = 0) & less(vd486, vd488) = all_160_0
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 18.04/3.25  | |   (45)   ~ (all_160_0 = 0)
% 18.04/3.25  | |   (46)  less(vd486, vd488) = all_160_0
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | BETA: splitting (34) gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | Case 1:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | |   (47)  all_66_0 = 0
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | REDUCE: (31), (47) imply:
% 18.04/3.25  | | |   (48)  $false
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | CLOSE: (48) is inconsistent.
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | Case 2:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | |   (49)   ? [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :
% 18.04/3.25  | | |         (leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) = v1 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_1) = v0 &
% 18.04/3.25  | | |           less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0)))
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | DELTA: instantiating (49) with fresh symbols all_170_0, all_170_1,
% 18.04/3.25  | | |        all_170_2 gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | | |   (50)  leq(all_55_1, all_55_0) = all_170_1 & leq(all_55_1, all_55_1) =
% 18.04/3.25  | | |         all_170_2 & less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = all_170_0 & ( ~ (all_170_0
% 18.04/3.25  | | |             = 0) |  ~ (all_170_1 = 0))
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | ALPHA: (50) implies:
% 18.04/3.25  | | |   (51)  less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = all_170_0
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | BETA: splitting (23) gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | Case 1:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | |   (52)  less(vd486, vd488) = 0
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with 0, all_160_0, vd488, vd486,
% 18.04/3.25  | | | |              simplifying with (46), (52) gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | |   (53)  all_160_0 = 0
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | REDUCE: (45), (53) imply:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | |   (54)  $false
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | CLOSE: (54) is inconsistent.
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | Case 2:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | |   (55)  all_53_0 = 0 | vd488 = vd486
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | BETA: splitting (55) gives:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | Case 1:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | |   (56)  all_53_0 = 0
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | REDUCE: (15), (56) imply:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | |   (57)  $false
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | CLOSE: (57) is inconsistent.
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | Case 2:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | |   (58)  vd488 = vd486
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | REDUCE: (29), (58) imply:
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | |   (59)  vmul(vd487, vd486) = all_55_0
% 18.04/3.25  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_55_1, all_55_0, vd486, vd487,
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |              simplifying with (27), (59) gives:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (60)  all_55_0 = all_55_1
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with all_154_0, all_170_0, all_55_1,
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |              all_55_1, simplifying with (40), (51) gives:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (61)  all_170_0 = all_154_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | REDUCE: (38), (60) imply:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (62)  less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = all_152_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | REDUCE: (24), (60) imply:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (63)  less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = 0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | REDUCE: (32), (60) imply:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (64)  less(all_55_1, all_55_1) = all_66_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with all_154_0, all_66_0, all_55_1,
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |              all_55_1, simplifying with (40), (64) gives:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (65)  all_154_0 = all_66_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with all_154_0, all_152_0, all_55_1,
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |              all_55_1, simplifying with (40), (62) gives:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (66)  all_154_0 = all_152_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (13) with 0, all_152_0, all_55_1, all_55_1,
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |              simplifying with (62), (63) gives:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (67)  all_152_0 = 0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (65), (66) imply:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (68)  all_152_0 = all_66_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | SIMP: (68) implies:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (69)  all_152_0 = all_66_0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (67), (69) imply:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (70)  all_66_0 = 0
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | REDUCE: (31), (70) imply:
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | |   (71)  $false
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | CLOSE: (71) is inconsistent.
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | End of split
% 18.04/3.26  | | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | | End of split
% 18.04/3.26  | | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | | End of split
% 18.04/3.26  | | 
% 18.04/3.26  | End of split
% 18.04/3.26  | 
% 18.04/3.26  End of proof
% 18.04/3.26  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 18.04/3.26  
% 18.04/3.26  2629ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------