TSTP Solution File: NUM852+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:22:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 21:48:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Tue Jul  5 21:48:27 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 21717.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.34  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.34  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.34  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [copy,28,flip.1] {-} vmul(A,B)=vmul(B,A).
% 0.12/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [copy,31,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,32,flip.1] {-} vmul(vsucc(A),B)=vplus(vmul(A,B),B).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.37/0.55  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.37/0.55  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.37/0.55  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.37/0.55  number of clauses initially in problem: 26
% 0.37/0.55  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 57
% 0.37/0.55  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.37/0.55  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.37/0.55  absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.37/0.55     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.37/0.55     distinct function count: 6
% 0.37/0.55     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.18 sec ----> 40 [binary,39.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  1 [] {+} -greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)).
% 0.37/0.55  3 [] {+} -greater(A,B)|greater(vplus(vmul(B,vd469),vmul(vskolem9(A,B),vd469)),vmul(B,vd469)).
% 0.37/0.55  4 [] {-} -greater(A,B)|vmul(vplus(B,vskolem9(A,B)),vd469)=vplus(vmul(B,vd469),vmul(vskolem9(A,B),vd469)).
% 0.37/0.55  5 [copy,4,flip.2] {+} -greater(A,B)|vplus(vmul(B,vd469),vmul(vskolem9(A,B),vd469))=vmul(vplus(B,vskolem9(A,B)),vd469).
% 0.37/0.55  8 [] {-} -greater(A,B)|A=vplus(B,vskolem9(A,B)).
% 0.37/0.55  9 [copy,8,flip.2] {+} -greater(A,B)|vplus(B,vskolem9(A,B))=A.
% 0.37/0.55  21 [] {-} greater(vd481,vd480).
% 0.37/0.55  36,35 [hyper,21,9] {-} vplus(vd480,vskolem9(vd481,vd480))=vd481.
% 0.37/0.55  38,37 [hyper,21,5,demod,36] {-} vplus(vmul(vd480,vd469),vmul(vskolem9(vd481,vd480),vd469))=vmul(vd481,vd469).
% 0.37/0.55  39 [hyper,21,3,demod,38] {-} greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)).
% 0.37/0.55  40 [binary,39.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.55  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  ============ end of search ============
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 0.37/0.55  false clauses given          1
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.37/0.55     3  1         1
% 0.37/0.55     7  1         0
% 0.37/0.55     9  0         1
% 0.37/0.55    10  2         0
% 0.37/0.55    11  1         0
% 0.37/0.55    13  1         0
% 0.37/0.55  tot:  6         2      (25.0% true)
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  Process 21717 finished Tue Jul  5 21:48:27 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------