TSTP Solution File: NUM852+2 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n072.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 15:22:31 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  18   ~;  15   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   2 sgn  30   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : equal(vmul(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),vplus(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X1,X3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(281, 0), 0)') ).

fof(2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( greater(X4,X5)
     => equal(X4,vplus(X5,vskolem9(X4,X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(302, 0), 3)') ).

fof(5,axiom,
    ! [X8,X9] : equal(vmul(X8,X9),vmul(X9,X8)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

fof(8,conjecture,
    greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(304))), 484, 0)') ).

fof(11,axiom,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( greater(X20,X19)
    <=> ? [X21] : equal(X20,vplus(X19,X21)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)') ).

fof(12,axiom,
    greater(vd481,vd480),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(304)), 483, 0)') ).

fof(14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[8]) ).

fof(15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[14,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(17,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : equal(vmul(X4,vplus(X5,X6)),vplus(vmul(X4,X5),vmul(X4,X6))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,X3)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

fof(19,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
      | equal(X4,vplus(X5,vskolem9(X4,X5))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

fof(20,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ~ greater(X6,X7)
      | equal(X6,vplus(X7,vskolem9(X6,X7))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( X1 = vplus(X2,vskolem9(X1,X2))
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

fof(26,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] : equal(vmul(X10,X11),vmul(X11,X10)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

cnf(32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vmul(vd481,vd469),vmul(vd480,vd469)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

fof(38,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ greater(X20,X19)
        | ? [X21] : equal(X20,vplus(X19,X21)) )
      & ( ! [X21] : ~ equal(X20,vplus(X19,X21))
        | greater(X20,X19) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

fof(39,plain,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ( ~ greater(X23,X22)
        | ? [X24] : equal(X23,vplus(X22,X24)) )
      & ( ! [X25] : ~ equal(X23,vplus(X22,X25))
        | greater(X23,X22) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

fof(40,plain,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ( ~ greater(X23,X22)
        | equal(X23,vplus(X22,esk1_2(X22,X23))) )
      & ( ! [X25] : ~ equal(X23,vplus(X22,X25))
        | greater(X23,X22) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[39]) ).

fof(41,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X25] :
      ( ( ~ equal(X23,vplus(X22,X25))
        | greater(X23,X22) )
      & ( ~ greater(X23,X22)
        | equal(X23,vplus(X22,esk1_2(X22,X23))) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | X1 != vplus(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    greater(vd481,vd480),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    vplus(vd480,vskolem9(vd481,vd480)) = vd481,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(82,plain,
    ( greater(X1,vmul(X2,X3))
    | vmul(X2,vplus(X3,X4)) != X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[43,18,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(180,plain,
    ( greater(X1,vmul(X2,vd480))
    | vmul(X2,vd481) != X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[82,69,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(188,plain,
    ( greater(X1,vmul(X2,vd480))
    | vmul(vd481,X2) != X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[180,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(193,plain,
    greater(vmul(vd481,X1),vmul(X1,vd480)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[188,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(222,plain,
    greater(vmul(vd481,X1),vmul(vd480,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[193,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(304,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[32,222,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(305,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[304,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(306,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    305,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n072.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 14:53:19 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.27  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.27  --creating new selector for []
% 0.07/0.34  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.34  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp2PRfWO/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.34  -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.34  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.34  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.34  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.34  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.35  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------