TSTP Solution File: NUM852+2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:42:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.19s 1.72s
% Output   : Refutation 3.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   29
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  16 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (  30 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  294 (  14   ~;  10   |;   2   &; 248   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  18  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (  11   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   0   ^;  72   !;   6   ?;  78   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(greater_type,type,
    greater: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(vmul_type,type,
    vmul: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(vd481_type,type,
    vd481: $i ).

thf(vd469_type,type,
    vd469: $i ).

thf(vd480_type,type,
    vd480: $i ).

thf(less_type,type,
    less: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(vplus_type,type,
    vplus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(vskolem9_type,type,
    vskolem9: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(vsucc_type,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( ( vmul @ A @ vd469 )
        = ( vmul @ ( vplus @ B @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) ) @ vd469 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(302, 0), 2)') ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( ( vmul @ A @ vd469 )
        = ( vmul @ ( vplus @ B @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) ) @ vd469 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( A
        = ( vplus @ B @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(302, 0), 3)') ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( A
        = ( vplus @ B @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
     => ( greater @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(147, 0), 0)') ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
     => ( greater @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( greater @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( less @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)') ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( greater @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( less @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ A @ ( vplus @ B @ C ) )
      = ( vplus @ ( vmul @ A @ B ) @ ( vmul @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(281, 0), 0)') ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ A @ ( vplus @ B @ C ) )
      = ( vplus @ ( vmul @ A @ B ) @ ( vmul @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ A @ B )
      = ( vmul @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ A @ B )
      = ( vmul @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    less @ vd480 @ vd481,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(antec(304), 482, 0)') ).

thf(76,plain,
    less @ vd480 @ vd481,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(21,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ ( vmul @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( vmul @ A @ ( vmul @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(290, 0), 0)') ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ ( vmul @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( vmul @ A @ ( vmul @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( ( vmul @ ( vplus @ B @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) ) @ vd469 )
        = ( vplus @ ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) @ vd469 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(302, 0), 1)') ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( ( vmul @ ( vplus @ B @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) ) @ vd469 )
        = ( vplus @ ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) @ vd469 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A != B )
      | ~ ( less @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)') ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A != B )
      | ~ ( less @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( greater @ ( vplus @ ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) @ vd469 ) ) @ ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(302, 0), 0)') ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( greater @ ( vplus @ ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ ( vskolem9 @ A @ B ) @ vd469 ) ) @ ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
     => ( ( vmul @ A @ vd469 )
        = ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(303, 0), 0)') ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
     => ( ( vmul @ A @ vd469 )
        = ( vmul @ B @ vd469 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    greater @ vd481 @ vd480,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(304)), 483, 0)') ).

thf(70,plain,
    greater @ vd481 @ vd480,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A != B )
      | ~ ( greater @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3)') ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A != B )
      | ~ ( greater @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ B @ A )
    <=> ? [C: $i] :
          ( B
          = ( vplus @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)') ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( greater @ B @ A )
       => ? [C: $i] :
            ( B
            = ( vplus @ A @ C ) ) )
      & ( ? [C: $i] :
            ( B
            = ( vplus @ A @ C ) )
       => ( greater @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( greater @ A @ B )
      | ( less @ A @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)') ).

thf(64,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
      | ( greater @ A @ B )
      | ( less @ A @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    greater @ ( vmul @ vd481 @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ vd480 @ vd469 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(304))), 484, 0)') ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( greater @ ( vmul @ vd481 @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ vd480 @ vd469 ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ~ ( greater @ ( vmul @ vd481 @ vd469 ) @ ( vmul @ vd480 @ vd469 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ ( vsucc @ A ) @ B )
      = ( vplus @ ( vmul @ A @ B ) @ B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(261, 0), 0)') ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( vmul @ ( vsucc @ A ) @ B )
      = ( vplus @ ( vmul @ A @ B ) @ B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(140, 0), 0)') ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( greater @ A @ B )
     => ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( less @ B @ A )
    <=> ? [C: $i] :
          ( A
          = ( vplus @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)') ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( less @ B @ A )
       => ? [C: $i] :
            ( A
            = ( vplus @ B @ C ) ) )
      & ( ? [C: $i] :
            ( A
            = ( vplus @ B @ C ) )
       => ( less @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(83,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[42,52,57,74,77,71,76,80,67,30,62,38,70,34,45,64,22,59,55,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM852+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May 18 16:50:07 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.96/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.31/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (118ms). 
% 1.31/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.69/1.16  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.69/1.16  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.69/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.77/1.21  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 19 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.95/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 19 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.95/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 1.95/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.95/1.28  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.19/1.71  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.19/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.19/1.71  % Time passed: 1188ms (effective reasoning time: 738ms)
% 3.19/1.71  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.19/1.71  % Axioms used in derivation (19): def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1), holds(antec(304), 482, 0), ass(cond(302, 0), 2), ass(cond(147, 0), 0), ass(cond(281, 0), 0), ass(cond(302, 0), 1), ass(cond(261, 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2), ass(cond(140, 0), 0), def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1), ass(cond(302, 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1), ass(cond(302, 0), 3), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0), ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3), ass(cond(270, 0), 0), holds(conseq_conjunct1(conseq(304)), 483, 0), ass(cond(290, 0), 0), ass(cond(303, 0), 0)
% 3.19/1.71  % No. of inferences in proof: 42
% 3.19/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1188 ms resp. 738 ms w/o parsing
% 3.19/1.76  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.19/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------