TSTP Solution File: NUM851+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : NUM851+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:58:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM851+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 17:28:47 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.50  Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.50  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.21/0.50    fof('ass(cond(270, 0), 0)', axiom, ![Vd418, Vd419]: vmul(Vd418, Vd419)=vmul(Vd419, Vd418)).
% 0.21/0.50    fof('ass(cond(281, 0), 0)', axiom, ![Vd432, Vd433, Vd434]: vmul(Vd432, vplus(Vd433, Vd434))=vplus(vmul(Vd432, Vd433), vmul(Vd432, Vd434))).
% 0.21/0.50    fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)', axiom, ![Vd78, Vd79]: vplus(Vd79, Vd78)=vplus(Vd78, Vd79)).
% 0.21/0.50    fof('holds(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(302)), 475, 1)', conjecture, vmul(vplus(vd471, vd473), vd469)=vplus(vmul(vd471, vd469), vmul(vd473, vd469))).
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.21/0.50  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.21/0.50  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.21/0.50    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.21/0.50    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.21/0.50  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.21/0.50  variables of u and v.
% 0.21/0.50  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.21/0.50  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  Axiom 1 (ass(cond(270, 0), 0)): vmul(X, Y) = vmul(Y, X).
% 0.21/0.50  Axiom 2 (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)): vplus(X, Y) = vplus(Y, X).
% 0.21/0.50  Axiom 3 (ass(cond(281, 0), 0)): vmul(X, vplus(Y, Z)) = vplus(vmul(X, Y), vmul(X, Z)).
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  Goal 1 (holds(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(302)), 475, 1)): vmul(vplus(vd471, vd473), vd469) = vplus(vmul(vd471, vd469), vmul(vd473, vd469)).
% 0.21/0.50  Proof:
% 0.21/0.50    vmul(vplus(vd471, vd473), vd469)
% 0.21/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (ass(cond(270, 0), 0)) }
% 0.21/0.50    vmul(vd469, vplus(vd471, vd473))
% 0.21/0.50  = { by axiom 2 (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)) }
% 0.21/0.50    vmul(vd469, vplus(vd473, vd471))
% 0.21/0.50  = { by axiom 3 (ass(cond(281, 0), 0)) }
% 0.21/0.50    vplus(vmul(vd469, vd473), vmul(vd469, vd471))
% 0.21/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (ass(cond(270, 0), 0)) }
% 0.21/0.50    vplus(vmul(vd473, vd469), vmul(vd469, vd471))
% 0.21/0.50  = { by axiom 1 (ass(cond(270, 0), 0)) }
% 0.21/0.50    vplus(vmul(vd473, vd469), vmul(vd471, vd469))
% 0.21/0.50  = { by axiom 2 (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)) R->L }
% 0.21/0.50    vplus(vmul(vd471, vd469), vmul(vd473, vd469))
% 0.21/0.50  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------