TSTP Solution File: NUM851+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : NUM851+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:08:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(302)), 475, 1)',conjecture,
vmul(vplus(vd471,vd473),vd469) = vplus(vmul(vd471,vd469),vmul(vd473,vd469)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sFj87OEBtF/E---3.1_21374.p','holds(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(302)), 475, 1)') ).
fof('ass(cond(270, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X7,X8] : vmul(X7,X8) = vmul(X8,X7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sFj87OEBtF/E---3.1_21374.p','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).
fof('ass(cond(281, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6] : vmul(X4,vplus(X5,X6)) = vplus(vmul(X4,X5),vmul(X4,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sFj87OEBtF/E---3.1_21374.p','ass(cond(281, 0), 0)') ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
vmul(vplus(vd471,vd473),vd469) != vplus(vmul(vd471,vd469),vmul(vd473,vd469)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(conseq_conjunct2(conseq(302)), 475, 1)'])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X130,X131] : vmul(X130,X131) = vmul(X131,X130),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(270, 0), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
vmul(vplus(vd471,vd473),vd469) != vplus(vmul(vd471,vd469),vmul(vd473,vd469)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X127,X128,X129] : vmul(X127,vplus(X128,X129)) = vplus(vmul(X127,X128),vmul(X127,X129)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(281, 0), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
vmul(vd469,vplus(vd471,vd473)) != vplus(vmul(vd471,vd469),vmul(vd469,vd473)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
vmul(X1,vplus(X2,X3)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),vmul(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM851+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 14:52:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sFj87OEBtF/E---3.1_21374.p
% 0.20/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # new_bool_1 with pid 21517 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 21520 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 54
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses : 63
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 62
% 0.20/0.51 # Processed clauses : 59
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.20/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 55
% 0.20/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 0.20/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.20/0.51 # Generated clauses : 9
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.20/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.20/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 42
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.20/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.20/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 34
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34
% 0.20/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.20/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 31
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2857
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.20/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------