TSTP Solution File: NUM848+2 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : NUM848+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:41:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  25 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    vd436: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    vd437: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    vmul: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    vd439: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    vplus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    v1: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    vskolem2: $i > $i ).

fof('holds(286, 441, 4)',conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 4)') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( vplus(X13,vsucc(X14)) = vsucc(vplus(X13,X14))
      & vplus(X13,v1) = vsucc(X13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( vmul(X1,vsucc(X2)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1)
      & vmul(X1,v1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] : vplus(X6,X5) = vplus(X5,X6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X10,X11,X12] : vplus(vplus(X10,X11),X12) = vplus(X10,vplus(X11,X12)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).

fof('holds(286, 441, 3)',axiom,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(286, 441, 3)') ).

fof('holds(285, 440, 0)',axiom,
    vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(285, 440, 0)') ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 4)'])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( vplus(X28,vsucc(X29)) = vsucc(vplus(X28,X29))
      & vplus(X28,v1) = vsucc(X28) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))']) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( vmul(X16,vsucc(X17)) = vplus(vmul(X16,X17),X16)
      & vmul(X16,v1) = X16 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    vplus(X1,v1) = vsucc(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] : vplus(X21,X20) = vplus(X20,X21),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    vmul(X1,vsucc(X2)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X27] : vplus(vplus(X25,X26),X27) = vplus(X25,vplus(X26,X27)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(vd439,v1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(286, 441, 3)']) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(285, 440, 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,v1)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(v1,vd439))) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))) = vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,v1)) = vplus(X1,vmul(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),X1)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(v1,vd439))) != vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(v1,X2)) = vplus(X1,vmul(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(X1,vmul(vd436,vd439))) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.07  % Problem    : NUM848+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.07  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.26  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.26  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 13:08:02 EDT 2023
% 0.06/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.40  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.43  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.10/0.43  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  % Proof found
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time : 0.024000 s
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time : 0.027000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------