TSTP Solution File: NUM848+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM848+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:37:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(286, 441, 4)',conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(286, 441, 4)') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X79,X80] :
      ( vplus(X79,vsucc(X80)) = vsucc(vplus(X79,X80))
      & vplus(X79,v1) = vsucc(X79) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).

fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))',axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( vmul(X6,vsucc(X7)) = vplus(vmul(X6,X7),X6)
      & vmul(X6,v1) = X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))') ).

fof('ass(cond(270, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X71,X72] : vplus(X72,X71) = vplus(X71,X72),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X76,X77,X78] : vplus(vplus(X76,X77),X78) = vplus(X76,vplus(X77,X78)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 4)']) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X81,X82,X81] :
      ( vplus(X81,vsucc(X82)) = vsucc(vplus(X81,X82))
      & vplus(X81,v1) = vsucc(X81) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))'])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X8] :
      ( vmul(X8,vsucc(X9)) = vplus(vmul(X8,X9),X8)
      & vmul(X8,v1) = X8 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0), holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))'])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    vplus(X1,v1) = vsucc(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : vmul(X3,X4) = vmul(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(270, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] : vplus(X74,X73) = vplus(X73,X74),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X79,X80,X81] : vplus(vplus(X79,X80),X81) = vplus(X79,vplus(X80,X81)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    vmul(X1,vsucc(X2)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vplus(vd439,v1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,v1)) = vplus(vmul(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd437,vd436),vmul(vd436,vplus(vd439,v1))) != vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd439,vd436),vmul(vd437,vd436))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    vmul(X1,vplus(X2,v1)) = vplus(X1,vmul(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM848+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 10:41:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 24
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 57
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 27
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 32
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 37
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 31
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 99
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 84
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 91
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 53
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 96
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 32
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 32
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2328
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 2876 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------