TSTP Solution File: NUM848+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM848+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 54.40s 38.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 54.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  15 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   4   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   22 (  12   >;  10   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;  10   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less > leq > greater > geq > vplus > vmul > #nlpp > vsucc > vskolem2 > vd439 > vd437 > vd436 > v1 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(greater,type,
    greater: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vd439,type,
    vd439: $i ).

tff(vplus,type,
    vplus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vd437,type,
    vd437: $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(less,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vskolem2,type,
    vskolem2: $i > $i ).

tff(vsucc,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

tff(v1,type,
    v1: $i ).

tff(geq,type,
    geq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vmul,type,
    vmul: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vd436,type,
    vd436: $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_230,axiom,
    ! [Vd78,Vd79] : ( vplus(Vd79,Vd78) = vplus(Vd78,Vd79) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(61,0),0)) ).

tff(f_46,axiom,
    ! [Vd396,Vd397] :
      ( ( vmul(Vd396,vsucc(Vd397)) = vplus(vmul(Vd396,Vd397),Vd396) )
      & ( vmul(Vd396,v1) = Vd396 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)),32),and(holds(definiens(249),399,0),holds(definiens(249),398,0)))) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(285,440,0)) ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(286,441,3)) ).

tff(f_28,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(286,441,4)) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ! [Vd79_109,Vd78_108] : ( vplus(Vd79_109,Vd78_108) = vplus(Vd78_108,Vd79_109) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_230]) ).

tff(c_1938,plain,
    ! [Vd396_271,Vd397_272] : ( vplus(vmul(Vd396_271,Vd397_272),Vd396_271) = vmul(Vd396_271,vsucc(Vd397_272)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_2062,plain,
    ! [Vd78_108,Vd397_272] : ( vplus(Vd78_108,vmul(Vd78_108,Vd397_272)) = vmul(Vd78_108,vsucc(Vd397_272)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_115,c_1938]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)) = vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vd439))) = vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_115,c_115,c_4]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_147,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))) != vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_146,c_115,c_2]) ).

tff(c_28051,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))) != vmul(vd436,vsucc(vplus(vd437,vd439))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2062,c_147]) ).

tff(c_28050,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vsucc(vd439))) = vmul(vd436,vsucc(vplus(vd437,vd439))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2062,c_2062,c_146]) ).

tff(c_176623,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_28051,c_28050]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM848+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:27:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 54.40/38.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 54.40/38.73  
% 54.40/38.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 54.51/38.76  
% 54.51/38.76  Inference rules
% 54.51/38.76  ----------------------
% 54.51/38.76  #Ref     : 28
% 54.51/38.76  #Sup     : 47311
% 54.51/38.76  #Fact    : 8
% 54.51/38.76  #Define  : 0
% 54.51/38.76  #Split   : 3
% 54.51/38.76  #Chain   : 0
% 54.51/38.76  #Close   : 0
% 54.51/38.76  
% 54.51/38.76  Ordering : KBO
% 54.51/38.76  
% 54.51/38.76  Simplification rules
% 54.51/38.76  ----------------------
% 54.51/38.76  #Subsume      : 12063
% 54.51/38.76  #Demod        : 12294
% 54.51/38.76  #Tautology    : 5819
% 54.51/38.76  #SimpNegUnit  : 1666
% 54.51/38.76  #BackRed      : 10
% 54.51/38.76  
% 54.51/38.76  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 54.51/38.76  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 54.51/38.76  
% 54.51/38.76  Timing (in seconds)
% 54.51/38.76  ----------------------
% 54.55/38.76  Preprocessing        : 0.65
% 54.55/38.76  Parsing              : 0.34
% 54.55/38.76  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 54.55/38.76  Main loop            : 37.02
% 54.55/38.76  Inferencing          : 3.02
% 54.55/38.76  Reduction            : 17.58
% 54.55/38.76  Demodulation         : 11.88
% 54.55/38.76  BG Simplification    : 0.26
% 54.55/38.76  Subsumption          : 12.57
% 54.55/38.76  Abstraction          : 0.31
% 54.55/38.76  MUC search           : 0.00
% 54.55/38.76  Cooper               : 0.00
% 54.55/38.76  Total                : 37.71
% 54.55/38.76  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 54.55/38.76  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 54.55/38.76  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 54.55/38.76  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------