TSTP Solution File: NUM847+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM847+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:57:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn; 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X8,X9] : vplus(X9,X8) = vplus(X8,X9),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cWkNKCI2Ax/E---3.1_22522.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).
fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X13,X14,X15] : vplus(vplus(X13,X14),X15) = vplus(X13,vplus(X14,X15)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cWkNKCI2Ax/E---3.1_22522.p','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).
fof('holds(286, 441, 3)',conjecture,
vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cWkNKCI2Ax/E---3.1_22522.p','holds(286, 441, 3)') ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X20,X21] : vplus(X21,X20) = vplus(X20,X21),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X22,X23,X24] : vplus(vplus(X22,X23),X24) = vplus(X22,vplus(X23,X24)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 3)'])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(ar,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : NUM847+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:20:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cWkNKCI2Ax/E---3.1_22522.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # new_bool_3 with pid 22683 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 22687 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FUUPM-FFSM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 16
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 702
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------