TSTP Solution File: NUM847+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM847+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:37:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(286, 441, 3)',conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) = vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(286, 441, 3)') ).

fof('ass(cond(270, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(270, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X71,X72] : vplus(X72,X71) = vplus(X71,X72),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X76,X77,X78] : vplus(vplus(X76,X77),X78) = vplus(X76,vplus(X77,X78)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(286, 441, 3)']) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : vmul(X3,X4) = vmul(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(270, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] : vplus(X74,X73) = vplus(X73,X74),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X79,X80,X81] : vplus(vplus(X79,X80),X81) = vplus(X79,vplus(X80,X81)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436) != vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vplus(vmul(vd436,vd439),vd436)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    vmul(X1,X2) = vmul(X2,X1),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(ar,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13,c_0_14,c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : NUM847+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 05:54:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.43  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object total steps             : 17
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 8
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 56
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 27
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.25/1.43  # Processed clauses                    : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.25/1.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 36
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1557
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.25/1.43  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Maximum resident set size: 2868 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------