TSTP Solution File: NUM846+2 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : NUM846+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 20:47:21 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s
% Output   : Solution 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21593/NUM846+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21593/NUM846+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21593/NUM846+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 21689
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439))=vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', 'holds(285, 440, 0)')).
% fof(3, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:vplus(X4,X3)=vplus(X3,X4),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', 'ass(cond(61, 0), 0)')).
% fof(21, conjecture,vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436)=vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', 'holds(286, 441, 2)')).
% fof(22, negated_conjecture,~(vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436)=vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[21])).
% fof(23, negated_conjecture,~(vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436)=vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[22,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(24,plain,(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439))=vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(27, plain,![X5]:![X6]:vplus(X6,X5)=vplus(X5,X6),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3])).
% cnf(28,plain,(vplus(X1,X2)=vplus(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(64,negated_conjecture,(vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436)!=vplus(vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)),vd436)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23])).
% cnf(82,negated_conjecture,(vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)))!=vplus(vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)),vd436)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[64,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(83,negated_conjecture,(vplus(vd436,vplus(vmul(vd436,vd437),vmul(vd436,vd439)))!=vplus(vd436,vmul(vd436,vplus(vd437,vd439)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[82,28,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(197,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[83,24,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(198,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[197,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(199,negated_conjecture,($false),198,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 52
% # ...of these trivial                : 4
% # ...subsumed                        : 20
% # ...remaining for further processing: 28
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 1
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 2
% # Generated clauses                  : 82
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 77
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 80
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 2
% # Current number of processed clauses: 24
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 7
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 7
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 7
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43
% # ...number of literals in the above : 58
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 19
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 19
% # Backwards rewriting index:    38 leaves,   1.13+/-0.409 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           12 leaves,   1.17+/-0.373 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           30 leaves,   1.13+/-0.340 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.010 s
% # System time            : 0.004 s
% # Total time             : 0.014 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21593/NUM846+2.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------