TSTP Solution File: NUM845+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM845+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.57s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  19 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   3   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   3   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (;  32   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ vplus > vmul > #nlpp > vsucc > vd411 > v1 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(vplus,type,
    vplus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vsucc,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(vd411,type,
    vd411: $i ).

tff(v1,type,
    v1: $i ).

tff(vmul,type,
    vmul: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_71,axiom,
    ! [Vd78,Vd79] : ( vplus(Vd79,Vd78) = vplus(Vd78,Vd79) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(61,0),0)) ).

tff(f_79,axiom,
    ! [Vd42,Vd43] :
      ( ( vplus(Vd42,vsucc(Vd43)) = vsucc(vplus(Vd42,Vd43)) )
      & ( vplus(Vd42,v1) = vsucc(Vd42) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)),3),and(holds(definiens(29),45,0),holds(definiens(29),44,0)))) ).

tff(f_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Vd416] :
        ( ( vmul(vsucc(vd411),Vd416) = vplus(vmul(vd411,Vd416),Vd416) )
       => ( vmul(vsucc(vd411),vsucc(Vd416)) = vplus(vmul(vd411,vsucc(Vd416)),vsucc(Vd416)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qu(ind(267),imp(267))) ).

tff(f_69,axiom,
    ! [Vd396,Vd397] :
      ( ( vmul(Vd396,vsucc(Vd397)) = vplus(vmul(Vd396,Vd397),Vd396) )
      & ( vmul(Vd396,v1) = Vd396 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)),32),and(holds(definiens(249),399,0),holds(definiens(249),398,0)))) ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [Vd46,Vd47,Vd48] : ( vplus(vplus(Vd46,Vd47),Vd48) = vplus(Vd46,vplus(Vd47,Vd48)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(33,0),0)) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [Vd79_12,Vd78_11] : ( vplus(Vd79_12,Vd78_11) = vplus(Vd78_11,Vd79_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [Vd42_17,Vd43_18] : ( vplus(Vd42_17,vsucc(Vd43_18)) = vsucc(vplus(Vd42_17,Vd43_18)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd411,vsucc('#skF_1')),vsucc('#skF_1')) != vmul(vsucc(vd411),vsucc('#skF_1')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    vsucc(vplus('#skF_1',vmul(vd411,vsucc('#skF_1')))) != vmul(vsucc(vd411),vsucc('#skF_1')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_34,c_2]) ).

tff(c_186,plain,
    ! [Vd396_26,Vd397_27] : ( vplus(vmul(Vd396_26,Vd397_27),Vd396_26) = vmul(Vd396_26,vsucc(Vd397_27)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_214,plain,
    ! [Vd79_12,Vd397_27] : ( vplus(Vd79_12,vmul(Vd79_12,Vd397_27)) = vmul(Vd79_12,vsucc(Vd397_27)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_186]) ).

tff(c_153,plain,
    ! [Vd42_24,Vd43_25] : ( vplus(Vd42_24,vsucc(Vd43_25)) = vsucc(vplus(Vd42_24,Vd43_25)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_159,plain,
    ! [Vd43_25,Vd42_24] : ( vplus(vsucc(Vd43_25),Vd42_24) = vsucc(vplus(Vd42_24,Vd43_25)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_153,c_28]) ).

tff(c_397,plain,
    ! [Vd46_34,Vd47_35,Vd48_36] : ( vplus(vplus(Vd46_34,Vd47_35),Vd48_36) = vplus(Vd46_34,vplus(Vd47_35,Vd48_36)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_468,plain,
    ! [Vd79_12,Vd46_34,Vd47_35] : ( vplus(Vd79_12,vplus(Vd46_34,Vd47_35)) = vplus(Vd46_34,vplus(Vd47_35,Vd79_12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_397]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    vplus(vmul(vd411,'#skF_1'),'#skF_1') = vmul(vsucc(vd411),'#skF_1'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_441,plain,
    ! [Vd48_36] : ( vplus(vmul(vsucc(vd411),'#skF_1'),Vd48_36) = vplus(vmul(vd411,'#skF_1'),vplus('#skF_1',Vd48_36)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_397]) ).

tff(c_2742,plain,
    ! [Vd48_59] : ( vplus(vmul(vsucc(vd411),'#skF_1'),Vd48_59) = vplus('#skF_1',vplus(Vd48_59,vmul(vd411,'#skF_1'))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_468,c_441]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [Vd396_9,Vd397_10] : ( vplus(vmul(Vd396_9,Vd397_10),Vd396_9) = vmul(Vd396_9,vsucc(Vd397_10)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_2837,plain,
    vplus('#skF_1',vplus(vsucc(vd411),vmul(vd411,'#skF_1'))) = vmul(vsucc(vd411),vsucc('#skF_1')),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2742,c_24]) ).

tff(c_2930,plain,
    vsucc(vplus('#skF_1',vmul(vd411,vsucc('#skF_1')))) = vmul(vsucc(vd411),vsucc('#skF_1')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_214,c_34,c_28,c_159,c_2837]) ).

tff(c_2932,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_2930]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM845+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:06:51 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.57/2.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.57/2.37  
% 5.57/2.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.57/2.40  
% 5.57/2.40  Inference rules
% 5.57/2.40  ----------------------
% 5.57/2.40  #Ref     : 0
% 5.57/2.40  #Sup     : 726
% 5.57/2.40  #Fact    : 0
% 5.57/2.40  #Define  : 0
% 5.57/2.40  #Split   : 0
% 5.57/2.40  #Chain   : 0
% 5.57/2.40  #Close   : 0
% 5.57/2.40  
% 5.57/2.40  Ordering : KBO
% 5.57/2.40  
% 5.57/2.40  Simplification rules
% 5.57/2.40  ----------------------
% 5.57/2.40  #Subsume      : 78
% 5.57/2.40  #Demod        : 709
% 5.57/2.40  #Tautology    : 189
% 5.57/2.40  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 5.57/2.40  #BackRed      : 0
% 5.57/2.40  
% 5.57/2.40  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.57/2.40  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.57/2.40  
% 5.57/2.40  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.57/2.40  ----------------------
% 5.57/2.40  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 5.57/2.40  Parsing              : 0.28
% 5.57/2.40  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 5.57/2.40  Main loop            : 0.86
% 5.57/2.40  Inferencing          : 0.23
% 5.57/2.40  Reduction            : 0.44
% 5.57/2.40  Demodulation         : 0.38
% 5.57/2.40  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 5.57/2.40  Subsumption          : 0.12
% 5.57/2.40  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 5.57/2.40  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.57/2.40  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.57/2.40  Total                : 1.43
% 5.57/2.40  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.57/2.40  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.57/2.40  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.57/2.40  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------