TSTP Solution File: NUM844+2 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM844+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:50:21 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.75s 1.64s
% Output   : Proof 9.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : NUM844+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 07:58:41 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.62  
% 0.21/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.66  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.09  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.13  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.13  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.13  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.13  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.49/1.14  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.39/1.39  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.39/1.40  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.92/1.42  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.92/1.42  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.92/1.45  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.92/1.45  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.92/1.45  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.92/1.47  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 4.92/1.48  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.75/1.64  Prover 3: proved (990ms)
% 5.75/1.64  
% 5.75/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.75/1.64  
% 5.75/1.65  Prover 0: stopped
% 5.75/1.65  Prover 5: stopped
% 5.75/1.65  Prover 6: stopped
% 5.75/1.66  Prover 2: stopped
% 5.75/1.66  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.75/1.66  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.75/1.66  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 5.75/1.66  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 5.75/1.66  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 6.86/1.68  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.86/1.70  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.86/1.70  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.86/1.71  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.06/1.71  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.22/1.81  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.91/1.82  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.91/1.82  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.91/1.83  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.91/1.83  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.91/1.84  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.91/1.84  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 1: Found proof (size 104)
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 1: proved (1315ms)
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 10: stopped
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 7: stopped
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 8: stopped
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 13: stopped
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 4: stopped
% 8.44/1.96  Prover 11: stopped
% 8.44/1.96  
% 8.44/1.96  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.44/1.96  
% 9.10/1.99  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.10/2.00  Assumptions after simplification:
% 9.10/2.00  ---------------------------------
% 9.10/2.00  
% 9.10/2.00    (ass(cond(61, 0), 0))
% 9.23/2.02     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (vplus(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 9.23/2.02      |  ~ $i(v0) | (vplus(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 9.23/2.02  
% 9.23/2.02    (holds(264, 412, 0))
% 9.23/2.02    $i(v1) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] : (vmul(v0, v1) = v0 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 &
% 9.23/2.02      $i(v0))
% 9.23/2.02  
% 9.23/2.02    (holds(264, 412, 1))
% 9.23/2.02    $i(v1) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (vmul(vd411, v1) = v1 &
% 9.23/2.02      vsucc(v1) = v0 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.23/2.02  
% 9.23/2.02    (holds(264, 412, 2))
% 9.23/2.02    $i(v1) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (vmul(vd411, v1) = v0 &
% 9.23/2.02      vsucc(v0) = v1 & vplus(v0, v1) = v1 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.23/2.02  
% 9.23/2.02    (holds(265, 414, 0))
% 9.32/2.03    $i(vd413) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (vmul(v0,
% 9.32/2.03        vd413) = v1 & vmul(vd411, vd413) = v2 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 & vplus(v2,
% 9.32/2.03        vd413) = v1 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.03  
% 9.32/2.03    (holds(266, 415, 0))
% 9.32/2.03    $i(vd413) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.03    : (vmul(v0, v1) = v2 & vmul(v0, vd413) = v3 & vsucc(vd413) = v1 & vsucc(vd411)
% 9.32/2.03      = v0 & vplus(v3, v0) = v2 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.03  
% 9.32/2.03    (holds(266, 415, 1))
% 9.32/2.03    $i(vd413) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.03    :  ? [v4: $i] : (vmul(v0, vd413) = v1 & vmul(vd411, vd413) = v3 & vsucc(vd411)
% 9.32/2.03      = v0 & vplus(v4, v0) = v2 & vplus(v3, vd413) = v4 & vplus(v1, v0) = v2 &
% 9.32/2.03      $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.03  
% 9.32/2.03    (holds(266, 415, 2))
% 9.32/2.03    $i(vd413) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.03    :  ? [v4: $i] : (vmul(vd411, vd413) = v0 & vsucc(vd411) = v2 & vplus(v1, v2) =
% 9.32/2.03      v3 & vplus(v0, v4) = v3 & vplus(v0, vd413) = v1 & vplus(vd413, v2) = v4 &
% 9.32/2.03      $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.03  
% 9.32/2.03    (holds(266, 415, 3))
% 9.32/2.04    $i(vd413) & $i(vd411) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.04    :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : ( ~ (v5 = v3) & vmul(vd411, vd413) = v0 &
% 9.32/2.04      vsucc(vd411) = v1 & vplus(v1, vd413) = v4 & vplus(v0, v4) = v5 & vplus(v0,
% 9.32/2.04        v2) = v3 & vplus(vd413, v1) = v2 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 9.32/2.04      $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.04  
% 9.32/2.04    (function-axioms)
% 9.32/2.04     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 9.32/2.04    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.32/2.04      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.04    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.32/2.04      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.04    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (less(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (less(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.32/2.04      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.04    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 9.32/2.04    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.32/2.04      (vmul(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 9.32/2.04    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 9.32/2.04    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vskolem2(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.32/2.04      (vskolem2(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 9.32/2.04      ~ (vsucc(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vsucc(v2) = v0))
% 9.32/2.04  
% 9.32/2.04  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 9.32/2.04  --------------------------------------------
% 9.32/2.04  ass(cond(12, 0), 0), ass(cond(20, 0), 0), ass(cond(234, 0), 0), ass(cond(241,
% 9.32/2.04      0), 0), ass(cond(253, 0), 0), ass(cond(33, 0), 0), ass(cond(43, 0), 0),
% 9.32/2.04  ass(cond(52, 0), 0), ass(cond(6, 0), 0), qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3),
% 9.32/2.04    and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0))),
% 9.32/2.04  qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 32), and(holds(definiens(249), 399, 0),
% 9.32/2.04      holds(definiens(249), 398, 0)))
% 9.32/2.04  
% 9.32/2.04  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 9.32/2.04  ---------------------------------
% 9.32/2.04  
% 9.32/2.04  Begin of proof
% 9.32/2.04  | 
% 9.32/2.04  | ALPHA: (holds(266, 415, 2)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (1)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 9.32/2.05  |        (vmul(vd411, vd413) = v0 & vsucc(vd411) = v2 & vplus(v1, v2) = v3 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          vplus(v0, v4) = v3 & vplus(v0, vd413) = v1 & vplus(vd413, v2) = v4 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(266, 415, 1)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (2)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 9.32/2.05  |        (vmul(v0, vd413) = v1 & vmul(vd411, vd413) = v3 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          vplus(v4, v0) = v2 & vplus(v3, vd413) = v4 & vplus(v1, v0) = v2 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(266, 415, 0)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (3)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] : (vmul(v0, v1) =
% 9.32/2.05  |          v2 & vmul(v0, vd413) = v3 & vsucc(vd413) = v1 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          vplus(v3, v0) = v2 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(265, 414, 0)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (4)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (vmul(v0, vd413) = v1 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          vmul(vd411, vd413) = v2 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 & vplus(v2, vd413) = v1 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(264, 412, 2)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (5)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (vmul(vd411, v1) = v0 & vsucc(v0) = v1 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          vplus(v0, v1) = v1 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(264, 412, 1)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (6)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (vmul(vd411, v1) = v1 & vsucc(v1) = v0 &
% 9.32/2.05  |          vsucc(vd411) = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(264, 412, 0)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (7)   ? [v0: $i] : (vmul(v0, v1) = v0 & vsucc(vd411) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.05  | 
% 9.32/2.05  | ALPHA: (holds(266, 415, 3)) implies:
% 9.32/2.05  |   (8)  $i(vd413)
% 9.32/2.05  |   (9)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : 
% 9.32/2.05  |        ? [v5: $i] : ( ~ (v5 = v3) & vmul(vd411, vd413) = v0 & vsucc(vd411) =
% 9.32/2.05  |          v1 & vplus(v1, vd413) = v4 & vplus(v0, v4) = v5 & vplus(v0, v2) = v3
% 9.32/2.06  |          & vplus(vd413, v1) = v2 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1)
% 9.32/2.06  |          & $i(v0))
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (10)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vsucc(v2) =
% 9.32/2.06  |             v1) |  ~ (vsucc(v2) = v0))
% 9.32/2.06  |   (11)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.32/2.06  |           (vplus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vplus(v3, v2) = v0))
% 9.32/2.06  |   (12)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.32/2.06  |           (vmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vmul(v3, v2) = v0))
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | DELTA: instantiating (7) with fresh symbol all_16_0 gives:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (13)  vmul(all_16_0, v1) = all_16_0 & vsucc(vd411) = all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0)
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | ALPHA: (13) implies:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (14)  vsucc(vd411) = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | DELTA: instantiating (6) with fresh symbols all_20_0, all_20_1 gives:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (15)  vmul(vd411, v1) = all_20_0 & vsucc(all_20_0) = all_20_1 & vsucc(vd411)
% 9.32/2.06  |         = all_20_1 & $i(all_20_0) & $i(all_20_1)
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | ALPHA: (15) implies:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (16)  vsucc(vd411) = all_20_1
% 9.32/2.06  |   (17)  vsucc(all_20_0) = all_20_1
% 9.32/2.06  |   (18)  vmul(vd411, v1) = all_20_0
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | DELTA: instantiating (5) with fresh symbols all_22_0, all_22_1 gives:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (19)  vmul(vd411, v1) = all_22_1 & vsucc(all_22_1) = all_22_0 &
% 9.32/2.06  |         vplus(all_22_1, v1) = all_22_0 & $i(all_22_0) & $i(all_22_1)
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | ALPHA: (19) implies:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (20)  $i(all_22_0)
% 9.32/2.06  |   (21)  vsucc(all_22_1) = all_22_0
% 9.32/2.06  |   (22)  vmul(vd411, v1) = all_22_1
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbols all_26_0, all_26_1, all_26_2
% 9.32/2.06  |        gives:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (23)  vmul(all_26_2, vd413) = all_26_1 & vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_26_0 &
% 9.32/2.06  |         vsucc(vd411) = all_26_2 & vplus(all_26_0, vd413) = all_26_1 &
% 9.32/2.06  |         $i(all_26_0) & $i(all_26_1) & $i(all_26_2)
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | ALPHA: (23) implies:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (24)  vplus(all_26_0, vd413) = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.06  |   (25)  vsucc(vd411) = all_26_2
% 9.32/2.06  |   (26)  vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_26_0
% 9.32/2.06  |   (27)  vmul(all_26_2, vd413) = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_28_0, all_28_1, all_28_2,
% 9.32/2.06  |        all_28_3 gives:
% 9.32/2.06  |   (28)  vmul(all_28_3, all_28_2) = all_28_1 & vmul(all_28_3, vd413) = all_28_0
% 9.32/2.06  |         & vsucc(vd413) = all_28_2 & vsucc(vd411) = all_28_3 & vplus(all_28_0,
% 9.32/2.06  |           all_28_3) = all_28_1 & $i(all_28_0) & $i(all_28_1) & $i(all_28_2) &
% 9.32/2.06  |         $i(all_28_3)
% 9.32/2.06  | 
% 9.32/2.06  | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (29)  vplus(all_28_0, all_28_3) = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.07  |   (30)  vsucc(vd411) = all_28_3
% 9.32/2.07  |   (31)  vmul(all_28_3, vd413) = all_28_0
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | DELTA: instantiating (1) with fresh symbols all_30_0, all_30_1, all_30_2,
% 9.32/2.07  |        all_30_3, all_30_4 gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (32)  vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_30_4 & vsucc(vd411) = all_30_2 &
% 9.32/2.07  |         vplus(all_30_3, all_30_2) = all_30_1 & vplus(all_30_4, all_30_0) =
% 9.32/2.07  |         all_30_1 & vplus(all_30_4, vd413) = all_30_3 & vplus(vd413, all_30_2)
% 9.32/2.07  |         = all_30_0 & $i(all_30_0) & $i(all_30_1) & $i(all_30_2) & $i(all_30_3)
% 9.32/2.07  |         & $i(all_30_4)
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | ALPHA: (32) implies:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (33)  $i(all_30_4)
% 9.32/2.07  |   (34)  vplus(vd413, all_30_2) = all_30_0
% 9.32/2.07  |   (35)  vplus(all_30_4, vd413) = all_30_3
% 9.32/2.07  |   (36)  vplus(all_30_4, all_30_0) = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.07  |   (37)  vplus(all_30_3, all_30_2) = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.07  |   (38)  vsucc(vd411) = all_30_2
% 9.32/2.07  |   (39)  vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_30_4
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_32_0, all_32_1, all_32_2,
% 9.32/2.07  |        all_32_3, all_32_4 gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (40)  vmul(all_32_4, vd413) = all_32_3 & vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_32_1 &
% 9.32/2.07  |         vsucc(vd411) = all_32_4 & vplus(all_32_0, all_32_4) = all_32_2 &
% 9.32/2.07  |         vplus(all_32_1, vd413) = all_32_0 & vplus(all_32_3, all_32_4) =
% 9.32/2.07  |         all_32_2 & $i(all_32_0) & $i(all_32_1) & $i(all_32_2) & $i(all_32_3) &
% 9.32/2.07  |         $i(all_32_4)
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | ALPHA: (40) implies:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (41)  vplus(all_32_3, all_32_4) = all_32_2
% 9.32/2.07  |   (42)  vplus(all_32_1, vd413) = all_32_0
% 9.32/2.07  |   (43)  vsucc(vd411) = all_32_4
% 9.32/2.07  |   (44)  vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_32_1
% 9.32/2.07  |   (45)  vmul(all_32_4, vd413) = all_32_3
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | DELTA: instantiating (9) with fresh symbols all_34_0, all_34_1, all_34_2,
% 9.32/2.07  |        all_34_3, all_34_4, all_34_5 gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (46)   ~ (all_34_0 = all_34_2) & vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_34_5 &
% 9.32/2.07  |         vsucc(vd411) = all_34_4 & vplus(all_34_4, vd413) = all_34_1 &
% 9.32/2.07  |         vplus(all_34_5, all_34_1) = all_34_0 & vplus(all_34_5, all_34_3) =
% 9.32/2.07  |         all_34_2 & vplus(vd413, all_34_4) = all_34_3 & $i(all_34_0) &
% 9.32/2.07  |         $i(all_34_1) & $i(all_34_2) & $i(all_34_3) & $i(all_34_4) &
% 9.32/2.07  |         $i(all_34_5)
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | ALPHA: (46) implies:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (47)   ~ (all_34_0 = all_34_2)
% 9.32/2.07  |   (48)  vplus(vd413, all_34_4) = all_34_3
% 9.32/2.07  |   (49)  vplus(all_34_5, all_34_3) = all_34_2
% 9.32/2.07  |   (50)  vplus(all_34_5, all_34_1) = all_34_0
% 9.32/2.07  |   (51)  vplus(all_34_4, vd413) = all_34_1
% 9.32/2.07  |   (52)  vsucc(vd411) = all_34_4
% 9.32/2.07  |   (53)  vmul(vd411, vd413) = all_34_5
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_28_3, all_30_2, vd411, simplifying
% 9.32/2.07  |              with (30), (38) gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (54)  all_30_2 = all_28_3
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_28_3, all_32_4, vd411, simplifying
% 9.32/2.07  |              with (30), (43) gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (55)  all_32_4 = all_28_3
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_26_2, all_32_4, vd411, simplifying
% 9.32/2.07  |              with (25), (43) gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (56)  all_32_4 = all_26_2
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_20_1, all_32_4, vd411, simplifying
% 9.32/2.07  |              with (16), (43) gives:
% 9.32/2.07  |   (57)  all_32_4 = all_20_1
% 9.32/2.07  | 
% 9.32/2.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_30_2, all_34_4, vd411, simplifying
% 9.32/2.07  |              with (38), (52) gives:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (58)  all_34_4 = all_30_2
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_16_0, all_34_4, vd411, simplifying
% 9.32/2.08  |              with (14), (52) gives:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (59)  all_34_4 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_30_4, all_32_1, vd413, vd411,
% 9.32/2.08  |              simplifying with (39), (44) gives:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (60)  all_32_1 = all_30_4
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_32_1, all_34_5, vd413, vd411,
% 9.32/2.08  |              simplifying with (44), (53) gives:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (61)  all_34_5 = all_32_1
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_26_0, all_34_5, vd413, vd411,
% 9.32/2.08  |              simplifying with (26), (53) gives:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (62)  all_34_5 = all_26_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_20_0, all_22_1, v1, vd411,
% 9.32/2.08  |              simplifying with (18), (22) gives:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (63)  all_22_1 = all_20_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (58), (59) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (64)  all_30_2 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | SIMP: (64) implies:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (65)  all_30_2 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (61), (62) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (66)  all_32_1 = all_26_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | SIMP: (66) implies:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (67)  all_32_1 = all_26_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (60), (67) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (68)  all_30_4 = all_26_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (55), (56) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (69)  all_28_3 = all_26_2
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | SIMP: (69) implies:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (70)  all_28_3 = all_26_2
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (56), (57) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (71)  all_26_2 = all_20_1
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (54), (65) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (72)  all_28_3 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | SIMP: (72) implies:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (73)  all_28_3 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (70), (73) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (74)  all_26_2 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | SIMP: (74) implies:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (75)  all_26_2 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (71), (75) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (76)  all_20_1 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | COMBINE_EQS: (56), (75) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (77)  all_32_4 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (45), (77) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (78)  vmul(all_16_0, vd413) = all_32_3
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (31), (73) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (79)  vmul(all_16_0, vd413) = all_28_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (27), (75) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (80)  vmul(all_16_0, vd413) = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (21), (63) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (81)  vsucc(all_20_0) = all_22_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (17), (76) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (82)  vsucc(all_20_0) = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (51), (59) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (83)  vplus(all_16_0, vd413) = all_34_1
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (50), (62) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (84)  vplus(all_26_0, all_34_1) = all_34_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (49), (62) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (85)  vplus(all_26_0, all_34_3) = all_34_2
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (42), (67) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (86)  vplus(all_26_0, vd413) = all_32_0
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (41), (77) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (87)  vplus(all_32_3, all_16_0) = all_32_2
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (37), (65) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (88)  vplus(all_30_3, all_16_0) = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (36), (68) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (89)  vplus(all_26_0, all_30_0) = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (35), (68) imply:
% 9.32/2.08  |   (90)  vplus(all_26_0, vd413) = all_30_3
% 9.32/2.08  | 
% 9.32/2.08  | REDUCE: (29), (73) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (91)  vplus(all_28_0, all_16_0) = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (48), (59) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (92)  vplus(vd413, all_16_0) = all_34_3
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (34), (65) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (93)  vplus(vd413, all_16_0) = all_30_0
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (33), (68) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (94)  $i(all_26_0)
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_30_0, all_34_3, all_16_0, vd413,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (92), (93) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (95)  all_34_3 = all_30_0
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_26_1, all_32_0, vd413, all_26_0,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (24), (86) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (96)  all_32_0 = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_30_3, all_32_0, vd413, all_26_0,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (86), (90) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (97)  all_32_0 = all_30_3
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_16_0, all_22_0, all_20_0, simplifying
% 9.32/2.09  |              with (81), (82) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (98)  all_22_0 = all_16_0
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_28_0, all_32_3, vd413, all_16_0,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (78), (79) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (99)  all_32_3 = all_28_0
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_26_1, all_32_3, vd413, all_16_0,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (78), (80) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (100)  all_32_3 = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | COMBINE_EQS: (96), (97) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (101)  all_30_3 = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | COMBINE_EQS: (99), (100) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (102)  all_28_0 = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | SIMP: (102) implies:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (103)  all_28_0 = all_26_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (87), (100) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (104)  vplus(all_26_1, all_16_0) = all_32_2
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (88), (101) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (105)  vplus(all_26_1, all_16_0) = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (91), (103) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (106)  vplus(all_26_1, all_16_0) = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (85), (95) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (107)  vplus(all_26_0, all_30_0) = all_34_2
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (20), (98) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (108)  $i(all_16_0)
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_30_1, all_32_2, all_16_0, all_26_1,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (104), (105) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (109)  all_32_2 = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_28_1, all_32_2, all_16_0, all_26_1,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (104), (106) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (110)  all_32_2 = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_30_1, all_34_2, all_30_0, all_26_0,
% 9.32/2.09  |              simplifying with (89), (107) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (111)  all_34_2 = all_30_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | COMBINE_EQS: (109), (110) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (112)  all_30_1 = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | SIMP: (112) implies:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (113)  all_30_1 = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | COMBINE_EQS: (111), (113) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (114)  all_34_2 = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (47), (114) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (115)   ~ (all_34_0 = all_28_1)
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | REDUCE: (89), (113) imply:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (116)  vplus(all_26_0, all_30_0) = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)) with vd413, all_16_0,
% 9.32/2.09  |              all_30_0, simplifying with (8), (93), (108) gives:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (117)  vplus(all_16_0, vd413) = all_30_0 & $i(all_30_0)
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | ALPHA: (117) implies:
% 9.32/2.09  |   (118)  $i(all_30_0)
% 9.32/2.09  |   (119)  vplus(all_16_0, vd413) = all_30_0
% 9.32/2.09  | 
% 9.32/2.09  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)) with all_16_0, vd413,
% 9.32/2.09  |              all_34_1, simplifying with (8), (83), (108) gives:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (120)  vplus(vd413, all_16_0) = all_34_1 & $i(all_34_1)
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | ALPHA: (120) implies:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (121)  $i(all_34_1)
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)) with all_26_0, all_30_0,
% 9.32/2.10  |              all_28_1, simplifying with (94), (116), (118) gives:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (122)  vplus(all_30_0, all_26_0) = all_28_1 & $i(all_28_1)
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | ALPHA: (122) implies:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (123)  vplus(all_30_0, all_26_0) = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ass(cond(61, 0), 0)) with all_26_0, all_34_1,
% 9.32/2.10  |              all_34_0, simplifying with (84), (94), (121) gives:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (124)  vplus(all_34_1, all_26_0) = all_34_0 & $i(all_34_0)
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | ALPHA: (124) implies:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (125)  vplus(all_34_1, all_26_0) = all_34_0
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_34_1, all_30_0, vd413, all_16_0,
% 9.32/2.10  |              simplifying with (83), (119) gives:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (126)  all_34_1 = all_30_0
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | REDUCE: (125), (126) imply:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (127)  vplus(all_30_0, all_26_0) = all_34_0
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_28_1, all_34_0, all_26_0, all_30_0,
% 9.32/2.10  |              simplifying with (123), (127) gives:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (128)  all_34_0 = all_28_1
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | REDUCE: (115), (128) imply:
% 9.32/2.10  |   (129)  $false
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  | CLOSE: (129) is inconsistent.
% 9.32/2.10  | 
% 9.32/2.10  End of proof
% 9.32/2.10  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.32/2.10  
% 9.32/2.10  1478ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------