TSTP Solution File: NUM844+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM844+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:37:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 1 sgn 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('holds(266, 415, 3)',conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) = vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','holds(266, 415, 3)') ).
fof('qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))',axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( vplus(X16,vsucc(X17)) = vsucc(vplus(X16,X17))
& vplus(X16,v1) = vsucc(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))') ).
fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X8,X9] : vplus(X9,X8) = vplus(X8,X9),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).
fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
! [X13,X14,X15] : vplus(vplus(X13,X14),X15) = vplus(X13,vplus(X14,X15)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(266, 415, 3)']) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X18,X19,X18] :
( vplus(X18,vsucc(X19)) = vsucc(vplus(X18,X19))
& vplus(X18,v1) = vsucc(X18) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 3), and(holds(definiens(29), 45, 0), holds(definiens(29), 44, 0)))'])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X10,X11] : vplus(X11,X10) = vplus(X10,X11),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18] : vplus(vplus(X16,X17),X18) = vplus(X16,vplus(X17,X18)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vsucc(vd411))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vsucc(vd411),vd413)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
vplus(X1,v1) = vsucc(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vd413,vplus(vd411,v1))) != vplus(vmul(vd411,vd413),vplus(vplus(vd411,v1),vd413)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(ar,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : NUM844+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 04:44:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.39 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.39 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.39
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.22/1.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.39 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.22/1.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.22/1.39 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.22/1.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/1.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.22/1.39 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.22/1.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.22/1.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 17
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.22/1.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 789
% 0.22/1.39
% 0.22/1.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.39 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/1.39 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/1.39 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.39 # Maximum resident set size: 2796 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------