TSTP Solution File: NUM840+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM840+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.97s 2.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  15 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  14   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   15 (   8   >;   7   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (;  17   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less > greater > vplus > #nlpp > vsucc > vd330 > vd329 > vd328 > v1 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(greater,type,
    greater: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vplus,type,
    vplus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vd329,type,
    vd329: $i ).

tff(less,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vd328,type,
    vd328: $i ).

tff(vsucc,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

tff(v1,type,
    v1: $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vd330,type,
    vd330: $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_68,axiom,
    ! [Vd203,Vd204] :
      ( ( Vd203 != Vd204 )
      | ~ less(Vd203,Vd204) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(goal(130),0),1)) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    ! [Vd203,Vd204] :
      ( ( Vd203 = Vd204 )
      | greater(Vd203,Vd204)
      | less(Vd203,Vd204) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(goal(130),0),0)) ).

tff(f_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(vd328,vd329),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(conseq(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))),336,0)) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ( ( vplus(vd328,vd330) = vplus(vd329,vd330) )
   => ( vd328 = vd329 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(conjunct1(conjunct2(204)),0),0)) ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [Vd301,Vd302,Vd303] :
      ( greater(Vd301,Vd302)
     => greater(vplus(Vd301,Vd303),vplus(Vd302,Vd303)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(goal(193),0),2)) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(antec(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))),335,0)) ).

tff(f_74,axiom,
    ! [Vd203,Vd204] :
      ( ~ greater(Vd203,Vd204)
      | ~ less(Vd203,Vd204) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(goal(130),0),2)) ).

tff(c_23,plain,
    ! [Vd204_17] : ~ less(Vd204_17,Vd204_17),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_68]) ).

tff(c_411,plain,
    ! [Vd203_111,Vd204_112] :
      ( less(Vd203_111,Vd204_112)
      | greater(Vd203_111,Vd204_112)
      | ( Vd204_112 = Vd203_111 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ less(vd328,vd329),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_427,plain,
    ( greater(vd328,vd329)
    | ( vd329 = vd328 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_411,c_2]) ).

tff(c_432,plain,
    vd329 = vd328,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_427]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ( ( vd329 = vd328 )
    | ( vplus(vd329,vd330) != vplus(vd328,vd330) ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_345,plain,
    vplus(vd329,vd330) != vplus(vd328,vd330),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

tff(c_438,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_432,c_345]) ).

tff(c_439,plain,
    greater(vd328,vd329),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_427]) ).

tff(c_15,plain,
    ! [Vd301_7,Vd303_9,Vd302_8] :
      ( greater(vplus(Vd301_7,Vd303_9),vplus(Vd302_8,Vd303_9))
      | ~ greater(Vd301_7,Vd302_8) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_25,plain,
    ! [Vd203_18,Vd204_19] :
      ( ~ less(Vd203_18,Vd204_19)
      | ~ greater(Vd203_18,Vd204_19) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_313,plain,
    ~ greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_25]) ).

tff(c_1897,plain,
    ~ greater(vd328,vd329),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_313]) ).

tff(c_1901,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_439,c_1897]) ).

tff(c_1902,plain,
    vd329 = vd328,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

tff(c_1904,plain,
    less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1902,c_4]) ).

tff(c_1908,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_1904]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : NUM840+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:29:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.97/2.22  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.97/2.23  
% 4.97/2.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.97/2.25  
% 4.97/2.25  Inference rules
% 4.97/2.25  ----------------------
% 4.97/2.25  #Ref     : 2
% 4.97/2.25  #Sup     : 503
% 4.97/2.25  #Fact    : 0
% 4.97/2.25  #Define  : 0
% 4.97/2.25  #Split   : 2
% 4.97/2.25  #Chain   : 0
% 4.97/2.25  #Close   : 0
% 4.97/2.25  
% 4.97/2.25  Ordering : KBO
% 4.97/2.25  
% 4.97/2.25  Simplification rules
% 4.97/2.25  ----------------------
% 4.97/2.25  #Subsume      : 101
% 4.97/2.25  #Demod        : 112
% 4.97/2.25  #Tautology    : 96
% 4.97/2.25  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 4.97/2.25  #BackRed      : 7
% 4.97/2.25  
% 4.97/2.25  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.97/2.25  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.97/2.25  
% 4.97/2.25  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.97/2.25  ----------------------
% 4.97/2.26  Preprocessing        : 0.55
% 4.97/2.26  Parsing              : 0.29
% 4.97/2.26  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.97/2.26  Main loop            : 0.63
% 4.97/2.26  Inferencing          : 0.21
% 4.97/2.26  Reduction            : 0.22
% 4.97/2.26  Demodulation         : 0.16
% 4.97/2.26  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.97/2.26  Subsumption          : 0.13
% 4.97/2.26  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 4.97/2.26  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.97/2.26  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.97/2.26  Total                : 1.22
% 4.97/2.26  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.97/2.26  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.97/2.26  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.97/2.26  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------