TSTP Solution File: NUM839+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM839+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:30:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : NUM839+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 10:01:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.54/0.76  
% 0.54/0.76  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.54/0.76  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.54/0.76  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.54/0.76  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.54/0.76  SPASS derived 1967 clauses, backtracked 7 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 911 clauses.
% 0.54/0.76  SPASS allocated 86576 KBytes.
% 0.54/0.76  SPASS spent	0:00:00.41 on the problem.
% 0.54/0.76  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.54/0.76  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.54/0.76  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.54/0.76  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.54/0.76  		0:00:00.29 for the reduction.
% 0.54/0.76  
% 0.54/0.76  
% 0.54/0.76  Here is a proof with depth 10, length 28 :
% 0.54/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.54/0.76  1[0:Inp] || greater(vd328,vd329)* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  3[0:Inp] || greater(u,u)* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  4[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,v),u)*.
% 0.54/0.76  11[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330))*.
% 0.54/0.76  19[0:Inp] || less(u,v) -> greater(v,u)*.
% 0.54/0.76  21[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vplus(u,v),vplus(v,u))*.
% 0.54/0.76  24[0:Inp] ||  -> less(u,v) greater(u,v)* equal(u,v).
% 0.54/0.76  33[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater(vplus(u,w),vplus(v,w))*.
% 0.54/0.76  39[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> equal(vplus(v,skf5(v,u)),u)**.
% 0.54/0.76  41[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vplus(vplus(u,v),w),vplus(u,vplus(v,w)))**.
% 0.54/0.76  44[0:Res:19.1,1.0] || less(vd329,vd328)*l -> .
% 0.54/0.76  45[0:Res:24.1,1.0] ||  -> less(vd328,vd329)*r equal(vd329,vd328).
% 0.54/0.76  48[1:Spt:45.1] ||  -> equal(vd329,vd328)**.
% 0.54/0.76  51[1:Rew:48.0,11.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330))*.
% 0.54/0.76  53[1:MRR:51.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.54/0.76  54[1:Spt:53.0,45.1,48.0] || equal(vd329,vd328)** -> .
% 0.54/0.76  55[1:Spt:53.0,45.0] ||  -> less(vd328,vd329)*r.
% 0.54/0.76  67[0:SpR:21.0,4.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,v),v)*.
% 0.54/0.76  251[0:SpR:41.0,67.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,vplus(v,w)),w)*.
% 0.54/0.76  290[0:SpR:21.0,251.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,vplus(v,w)),v)*.
% 0.54/0.76  316[0:SpR:39.1,290.0] || greater(u,v) -> greater(vplus(w,u),v)*.
% 0.54/0.76  1873[0:Res:316.1,3.0] || greater(u,vplus(v,u))* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  1886[0:SpL:21.0,1873.0] || greater(u,vplus(u,v))* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  1979[0:SpL:39.1,1886.0] || greater(u,v)*+ greater(v,u)* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  2272[0:Res:11.0,1979.0] || greater(vplus(vd329,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330))* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  2301[0:Res:33.1,2272.0] || greater(vd329,vd328)* -> .
% 0.54/0.76  2306[0:Res:24.1,2301.0] ||  -> less(vd329,vd328)*l equal(vd329,vd328).
% 0.54/0.76  2309[1:MRR:2306.0,2306.1,44.0,54.0] ||  -> .
% 0.54/0.76  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.54/0.76  Formulae used in the proof : holds_a40_conseq_a40_204_a41__a44__a32_332_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_3_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_189_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ holds_a40_antec_a40_204_a41__a44__a32_331_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_147_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_61_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_193_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_2_a41_ def_a40_cond_a40_conseq_a40_axiom_a40_3_a41__a41__a44__a32_11_a41__a44__a32_1_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_33_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_
% 0.54/0.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------