TSTP Solution File: NUM839+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM839+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:30:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.73s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : NUM839+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 08:51:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.55/0.73  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.55/0.73  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/0.73  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.55/0.73  SPASS derived 1967 clauses, backtracked 7 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 911 clauses.
% 0.55/0.73  SPASS allocated 86577 KBytes.
% 0.55/0.73  SPASS spent	0:00:00.37 on the problem.
% 0.55/0.73  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.55/0.73  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.55/0.73  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.55/0.73  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.55/0.73  		0:00:00.26 for the reduction.
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Here is a proof with depth 10, length 28 :
% 0.55/0.73  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.55/0.73  1[0:Inp] || greater(vd328,vd329)* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  3[0:Inp] || greater(u,u)* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  4[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,v),u)*.
% 0.55/0.73  12[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330))*.
% 0.55/0.73  20[0:Inp] || less(u,v) -> greater(v,u)*.
% 0.55/0.73  22[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vplus(u,v),vplus(v,u))*.
% 0.55/0.73  25[0:Inp] ||  -> less(u,v) greater(u,v)* equal(u,v).
% 0.55/0.73  35[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater(vplus(u,w),vplus(v,w))*.
% 0.55/0.73  41[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> equal(vplus(v,skf5(v,u)),u)**.
% 0.55/0.73  43[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(vplus(vplus(u,v),w),vplus(u,vplus(v,w)))**.
% 0.55/0.73  46[0:Res:20.1,1.0] || less(vd329,vd328)*l -> .
% 0.55/0.73  47[0:Res:25.1,1.0] ||  -> less(vd328,vd329)*r equal(vd329,vd328).
% 0.55/0.73  50[1:Spt:47.1] ||  -> equal(vd329,vd328)**.
% 0.55/0.73  53[1:Rew:50.0,12.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330))*.
% 0.55/0.73  55[1:MRR:53.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.55/0.73  56[1:Spt:55.0,47.1,50.0] || equal(vd329,vd328)** -> .
% 0.55/0.73  57[1:Spt:55.0,47.0] ||  -> less(vd328,vd329)*r.
% 0.55/0.73  69[0:SpR:22.0,4.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,v),v)*.
% 0.55/0.73  253[0:SpR:43.0,69.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,vplus(v,w)),w)*.
% 0.55/0.73  292[0:SpR:22.0,253.0] ||  -> greater(vplus(u,vplus(v,w)),v)*.
% 0.55/0.73  318[0:SpR:41.1,292.0] || greater(u,v) -> greater(vplus(w,u),v)*.
% 0.55/0.73  1875[0:Res:318.1,3.0] || greater(u,vplus(v,u))* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  1888[0:SpL:22.0,1875.0] || greater(u,vplus(u,v))* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  1981[0:SpL:41.1,1888.0] || greater(u,v)*+ greater(v,u)* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  2274[0:Res:12.0,1981.0] || greater(vplus(vd329,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330))* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  2303[0:Res:35.1,2274.0] || greater(vd329,vd328)* -> .
% 0.55/0.73  2308[0:Res:25.1,2303.0] ||  -> less(vd329,vd328)*l equal(vd329,vd328).
% 0.55/0.73  2311[1:MRR:2308.0,2308.1,46.0,56.0] ||  -> .
% 0.55/0.73  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.55/0.73  Formulae used in the proof : holds_a40_conseq_a40_204_a41__a44__a32_332_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_3_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_189_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ holds_a40_antec_a40_204_a41__a44__a32_331_a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_147_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_61_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_130_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_goal_a40_193_a41__a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_2_a41_ def_a40_cond_a40_conseq_a40_axiom_a40_3_a41__a41__a44__a32_11_a41__a44__a32_1_a41_ ass_a40_cond_a40_33_a44__a32_0_a41__a44__a32_0_a41_
% 0.55/0.73  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------