TSTP Solution File: NUM839+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM839+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:57:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  31   ~;  19   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   7 sgn;  41   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('ass(cond(73, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X42,X43] : X43 != vplus(X42,X43),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(73, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(33, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X49,X50,X51] : vplus(vplus(X49,X50),X51) = vplus(X49,vplus(X50,X51)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(33, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X44,X45] : vplus(X45,X44) = vplus(X44,X45),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(61, 0), 0)') ).

fof('def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)',axiom,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( greater(X33,X32)
    <=> ? [X34] : X33 = vplus(X32,X34) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)') ).

fof('holds(antec(204), 331, 0)',axiom,
    greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','holds(antec(204), 331, 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 2)',axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( greater(X1,X2)
     => greater(vplus(X1,X3),vplus(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 2)') ).

fof('holds(conseq(204), 332, 0)',conjecture,
    greater(vd328,vd329),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','holds(conseq(204), 332, 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(147, 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( less(X23,X24)
     => greater(X24,X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(147, 0), 0)') ).

fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3)',axiom,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( X27 != X28
      | ~ greater(X27,X28) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3)') ).

fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)',axiom,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( X27 = X28
      | greater(X27,X28)
      | less(X27,X28) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)') ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X130,X131] : X131 != vplus(X130,X131),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(73, 0), 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X137,X138,X139] : vplus(vplus(X137,X138),X139) = vplus(X137,vplus(X138,X139)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(33, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    X1 != vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    vplus(vplus(X1,X2),X3) = vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X132,X133] : vplus(X133,X132) = vplus(X132,X133),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)) != X3,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    vplus(X1,X2) = vplus(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X107,X108,X110,X111,X112] :
      ( ( ~ greater(X108,X107)
        | X108 = vplus(X107,esk2_2(X107,X108)) )
      & ( X111 != vplus(X110,X112)
        | greater(X111,X110) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)'])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    vplus(X1,vplus(X2,X3)) != X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( X1 = vplus(X2,esk2_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ greater(X1,vplus(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ greater(X1,vplus(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(antec(204), 331, 0)']) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X67,X68,X69] :
      ( ~ greater(X67,X68)
      | greater(vplus(X67,X69),vplus(X68,X69)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 2)'])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    greater(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd330,vd329)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( greater(vplus(X1,X3),vplus(X2,X3))
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vd328,vd329),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(conseq(204), 332, 0)'])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X89,X90] :
      ( ~ less(X89,X90)
      | greater(X90,X89) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(147, 0), 0)'])]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( X27 != X28
      | ~ greater(X27,X28) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3)']) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ greater(vplus(vd330,vd329),vplus(vd328,vd330)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( greater(vplus(X1,X2),vplus(X3,X1))
    | ~ greater(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X93,X94] :
      ( X93 = X94
      | greater(X93,X94)
      | less(X93,X94) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)']) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vd328,vd329),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X99,X100] :
      ( X99 != X100
      | ~ greater(X99,X100) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ greater(vd329,vd328),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(vd329,vd328),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    vd329 = vd328,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ~ greater(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_40]),c_0_16]),c_0_41]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : NUM839+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 13:55:50 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.moTPZP3GkD/E---3.1_3233.p
% 0.20/0.54  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3312 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.54  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3319 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.54  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 37
% 0.20/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 45
% 0.20/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.20/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 43
% 0.20/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 623
% 0.20/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 22
% 0.20/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 364
% 0.20/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 236
% 0.20/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 69
% 0.20/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 12
% 0.20/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 51
% 0.20/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 2472
% 0.20/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2338
% 0.20/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.20/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 2395
% 0.20/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.20/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 74
% 0.20/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 436
% 0.20/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 129
% 0.20/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22
% 0.20/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.20/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 22
% 0.20/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 82
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1784
% 0.20/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4291
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 99
% 0.20/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2887
% 0.20/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2414
% 0.20/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 228
% 0.20/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 357
% 0.20/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 84
% 0.20/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 67
% 0.20/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 20086
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  # User time                : 0.046 s
% 0.20/0.54  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Total time               : 0.052 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  # User time                : 0.229 s
% 0.20/0.54  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Total time               : 0.244 s
% 0.20/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.20/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------