TSTP Solution File: NUM837+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : NUM837+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:58:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM837+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 16:23:58 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.41  Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.41  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(12, 0), 0)', axiom, ![Vd16]: vsucc(Vd16)!=Vd16).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(73, 0), 0)', axiom, ![Vd92, Vd93]: Vd93!=vplus(Vd92, Vd93)).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)', axiom, ![Vd203, Vd204]: (Vd203!=Vd204 | ~less(Vd203, Vd204))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)', axiom, ![Vd203_2, Vd204_2]: (~greater(Vd203_2, Vd204_2) | ~less(Vd203_2, Vd204_2))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3)', axiom, ![Vd203_2, Vd204_2]: (Vd203_2!=Vd204_2 | ~greater(Vd203_2, Vd204_2))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 1)', axiom, ![Vd120, Vd121]: (Vd120!=Vd121 | ~?[Vd125]: Vd121=vplus(Vd120, Vd125))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 2)', axiom, ![Vd120_2, Vd121_2]: (~?[Vd123]: Vd120_2=vplus(Vd121_2, Vd123) | ~?[Vd125_2]: Vd121_2=vplus(Vd120_2, Vd125_2))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 3)', axiom, ![Vd120_2, Vd121_2]: (Vd120_2!=Vd121_2 | ~?[Vd123_2]: Vd120_2=vplus(Vd121_2, Vd123_2))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)', axiom, ![Vd198, Vd199]: (less(Vd199, Vd198) <=> ?[Vd201]: Vd198=vplus(Vd199, Vd201))).
% 0.20/0.41    fof('holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)', axiom, less(vd268, vd269)).
% 0.20/0.42    fof('qe(171)', conjecture, ?[Vd273]: vd269=vplus(vd268, Vd273)).
% 0.20/0.42    fof('qu(restrictor(axiom(1)), holds(scope(axiom(1)), 2, 0))', axiom, ![Vd1]: vsucc(Vd1)!=v1).
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.20/0.42  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.20/0.42  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.20/0.42    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.20/0.42    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.20/0.42  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.20/0.42  variables of u and v.
% 0.20/0.42  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.20/0.42  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 1 (holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)): less(vd268, vd269) = true2.
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 2 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1): fresh5(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 3 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1): fresh5(less(X, Y), true2, Y, X) = vplus(X, vd201(Y, X)).
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Goal 1 (qe(171)): vd269 = vplus(vd268, X).
% 0.20/0.42  The goal is true when:
% 0.20/0.42    X = vd201(vd269, vd268)
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Proof:
% 0.20/0.42    vd269
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 2 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1) R->L }
% 0.20/0.42    fresh5(true2, true2, vd269, vd268)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 1 (holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)) R->L }
% 0.20/0.42    fresh5(less(vd268, vd269), true2, vd269, vd268)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 3 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1) }
% 0.20/0.42    vplus(vd268, vd201(vd269, vd268))
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------