TSTP Solution File: NUM837+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : NUM837+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n092.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.625MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan 8 15:22:27 EST 2018
% Result : Theorem 0.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 18 ~; 13 |; 4 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 1 sgn 22 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
less(vd268,vd269),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpnPQjnJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)') ).
fof(7,conjecture,
? [X8] : equal(vd269,vplus(vd268,X8)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpnPQjnJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','qe(171)') ).
fof(11,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( less(X16,X17)
=> greater(X17,X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpnPQjnJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','ass(cond(147, 0), 0)') ).
fof(12,axiom,
! [X18,X19] :
( greater(X19,X18)
<=> ? [X20] : equal(X19,vplus(X18,X20)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpnPQjnJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 11), 1)') ).
fof(23,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X8] : equal(vd269,vplus(vd268,X8)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7]) ).
cnf(25,plain,
less(vd268,vd269),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(38,negated_conjecture,
! [X8] : ~ equal(vd269,vplus(vd268,X8)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
fof(39,negated_conjecture,
! [X9] : ~ equal(vd269,vplus(vd268,X9)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[38]) ).
cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
vd269 != vplus(vd268,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
fof(51,plain,
! [X16,X17] :
( ~ less(X16,X17)
| greater(X17,X16) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(52,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ less(X18,X19)
| greater(X19,X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
cnf(53,plain,
( greater(X1,X2)
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[52]) ).
fof(54,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ( ~ greater(X19,X18)
| ? [X20] : equal(X19,vplus(X18,X20)) )
& ( ! [X20] : ~ equal(X19,vplus(X18,X20))
| greater(X19,X18) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(55,plain,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( ~ greater(X22,X21)
| ? [X23] : equal(X22,vplus(X21,X23)) )
& ( ! [X24] : ~ equal(X22,vplus(X21,X24))
| greater(X22,X21) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[54]) ).
fof(56,plain,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( ~ greater(X22,X21)
| equal(X22,vplus(X21,esk1_2(X21,X22))) )
& ( ! [X24] : ~ equal(X22,vplus(X21,X24))
| greater(X22,X21) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[55]) ).
fof(57,plain,
! [X21,X22,X24] :
( ( ~ equal(X22,vplus(X21,X24))
| greater(X22,X21) )
& ( ~ greater(X22,X21)
| equal(X22,vplus(X21,esk1_2(X21,X22))) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[56]) ).
cnf(58,plain,
( X1 = vplus(X2,esk1_2(X2,X1))
| ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
cnf(145,plain,
greater(vd269,vd268),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[53,25,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(152,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != vd269
| ~ greater(X1,vd268) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[40,58,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(269,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[152,145,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(272,negated_conjecture,
$false,
269,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : NUM837+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.24 % Computer : n092.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.24 % Memory : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.24 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.24 % DateTime : Fri Jan 5 14:38:35 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.24 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.28 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.28 --creating new selector for []
% 0.07/0.34 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpnPQjnJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.34 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpnPQjnJ/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.34 -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.34 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.35 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.35 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------