TSTP Solution File: NUM835+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM835+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:36:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  14   ~;  20   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   7 sgn  10   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)',axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( m(X4)
    <=> ( X3 = X4
        | ? [X5] : X3 = vplus(X4,X5)
        | ? [X6] : X4 = vplus(X3,X6) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)') ).

fof('dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))',conjecture,
    ( ? [X1] : vd165 = vplus(vd151,X1)
    | ? [X2] : vd151 = vplus(vd165,X2)
    | vd151 = vd165 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))') ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X7,X8,X11,X12] :
      ( ( ~ m(X8)
        | X7 = X8
        | X7 = vplus(X8,esk1_2(X7,X8))
        | X8 = vplus(X7,esk2_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( X7 != X8
        | m(X8) )
      & ( X7 != vplus(X8,X11)
        | m(X8) )
      & ( X8 != vplus(X7,X12)
        | m(X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)'])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X1] : vd165 = vplus(vd151,X1)
      | ? [X2] : vd151 = vplus(vd165,X2)
      | vd151 = vd165 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( m(X1)
    | X2 != vplus(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( vd165 != vplus(vd151,X3)
      & vd151 != vplus(vd165,X4)
      & vd151 != vd165 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = vplus(X2,esk2_2(X2,X1))
    | X2 = vplus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))
    | X2 = X1
    | ~ m(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    m(X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    vd165 != vplus(vd151,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( vplus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1)) = X2
    | vplus(X2,esk2_2(X2,X1)) = X1
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vplus(vd165,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( vplus(X1,esk1_2(vd151,X1)) = vd151
    | X1 = vd151
    | X1 != vd165 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vd165,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUM835+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 07:53:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 14
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 24
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 23
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 314
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 34
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 232
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 48
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 1644
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1620
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 1637
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 16
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1299
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2940
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 251
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 251
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 32
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 32
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 16591
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.036 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 3856 pages
% 0.23/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------