TSTP Solution File: NUM835+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM835+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:14:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.77s 7.95s
% Output   : Refutation 7.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   5 unt;   2 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (  10 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,negated_conjecture,
    vd165 != vplus(vd151,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))') ).

cnf(2,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vplus(vd165,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))') ).

cnf(3,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vd165,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))') ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ m(X)
    | Y = X
    | Y = vplus(X,'SKOLEMAAAU2'(Y,X))
    | X = vplus(Y,'SKOLEMAAAU3'(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)') ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( m(X)
    | Y != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)') ).

cnf(25,plain,
    m(X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ( Y = X
    | X = vplus(Y,'SKOLEMAAAU2'(X,Y))
    | Y = vplus(X,'SKOLEMAAAU3'(Y,X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[9,25]) ).

cnf(57,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[26,3,1,2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM835+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 09:55:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T09:55:52
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n005.cluster.edu at 2022-07-06T09:55:52
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|vplus| ?X ?Y) (|vplus| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|vplus| (|vplus| ?X ?Y) ?Z) (|vplus| ?X (|vplus| ?Y ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.50  ; Declaring vplus to be commutative.
% 7.77/7.95  ; Declaring vplus to be associative-commutative.
% 7.77/7.95  
% 7.77/7.95  #||
% 7.77/7.95  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.77/7.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 7.77/7.95  ||#
% 7.77/7.95  
% 7.77/7.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 7.77/7.95  ;      1785 formulas have been input or derived (from 22 formulas).
% 7.77/7.95  ;        57 ( 3%) were retained.  Of these,
% 7.77/7.95  ;            8 (14%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 7.77/7.95  ;           49 (86%) are still being kept.
% 7.77/7.95  ; 
% 7.77/7.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.008   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (39 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.005   0%   Process new row              (789 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     7.314  98%   Resolution                   (42 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.005   0%   Paramodulation               (21 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (2 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.000   0%   Embedding                    (2 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.051   1%   Condensing                   (225 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.003   0%   Forward subsumption          (225 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (28 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.026   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (229 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.027   0%   Forward simplification       (787 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.001   0%   Backward simplification      (55 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (122 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering ac                  (46 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     0.031   0%   Other
% 7.77/7.95  ;     7.473        Total
% 7.77/7.95  ;     7.475        Real time
% 7.77/7.95  ; 
% 7.77/7.95  ; Term-hash-array has 103 terms in all.
% 7.77/7.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 23 entries (23 at peak, 28 added, 5 deleted).
% 7.77/7.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 88 nodes (88 at peak, 111 added, 23 deleted).
% 7.77/7.95  ;  Retrieved 818 possibly forward subsuming rows in 225 calls.
% 7.77/7.95  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 28 calls.
% 7.77/7.95  ; Path-index has 94 entries (94 at peak, 108 added, 14 deleted).
% 7.77/7.95  ; Path-index has 115 nodes (115 at peak, 133 added, 18 deleted).
% 7.77/7.95  ; Trie-index has 94 entries (94 at peak, 108 added, 14 deleted).
% 7.77/7.95  ; Trie-index has 96 nodes (96 at peak, 113 added, 17 deleted).
% 7.77/7.95  ; Retrieved 6,897 generalization terms in 5,040 calls.
% 7.77/7.95  ; Retrieved 53 instance terms in 26 calls.
% 7.77/7.95  ; Retrieved 8,059 unifiable terms in 653 calls.
% 7.77/7.95  ; 
% 7.77/7.95  ; The agenda of rows to process has 966 entries:
% 7.77/7.95  ;     2 with value 5              11 with value 32               2 with value 47
% 7.77/7.95  ;     4 with value 11              3 with value 33              65 with value 48
% 7.77/7.95  ;     7 with value 15             74 with value 34               9 with value 49
% 7.77/7.95  ;    36 with value 16             24 with value 35              46 with value 51
% 7.77/7.95  ;     3 with value 19             32 with value 36              16 with value 52
% 7.77/7.95  ;    30 with value 20             25 with value 37              42 with value 54
% 7.77/7.95  ;     1 with value 22             10 with value 38               1 with value 56
% 7.77/7.95  ;    17 with value 23             13 with value 39              43 with value 57
% 7.77/7.95  ;     1 with value 24             75 with value 40               1 with value 58
% 7.77/7.95  ;     4 with value 25             12 with value 41              16 with value 60
% 7.77/7.95  ;     9 with value 26             69 with value 42              16 with value 61
% 7.77/7.95  ;     3 with value 27             26 with value 43              29 with value 63
% 7.77/7.95  ;    44 with value 28              3 with value 44              16 with value 67
% 7.77/7.95  ;    27 with value 29             34 with value 45               8 with value 69
% 7.77/7.95  ;     6 with value 31             51 with value 46
% 7.77/7.95  ; The agenda of rows to give has 30 entries:
% 7.77/7.95  ;     1 with value (4 4)           5 with value (4 10)           3 with value (4 14)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     2 with value (4 7)           6 with value (4 11)           1 with value (4 16)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     1 with value (4 8)           2 with value (4 12)           3 with value (4 17)
% 7.77/7.95  ;     1 with value (4 9)           2 with value (4 13)           3 with value (4 18)
% 7.77/7.95  Evaluation took:
% 7.77/7.95    7.475 seconds of real time
% 7.77/7.95    7.439847 seconds of user run time
% 7.77/7.95    0.03435 seconds of system run time
% 7.77/7.95    [Run times include 0.136 seconds GC run time.]
% 7.77/7.95    0 calls to %EVAL
% 7.77/7.95    0 page faults and
% 7.77/7.95    765,443,648 bytes consed.
% 7.77/7.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 7.77/7.95  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T09:56:00
% 7.77/7.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 7.77/7.95  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------