TSTP Solution File: NUM835+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM835+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:36:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  14   ~;  20   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   7 sgn  10   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)',axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( m(X6)
    <=> ( X5 = X6
        | ? [X7] : X5 = vplus(X6,X7)
        | ? [X8] : X6 = vplus(X5,X8) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)') ).

fof('dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))',conjecture,
    ( ? [X1] : vd165 = vplus(vd151,X1)
    | ? [X2] : vd151 = vplus(vd165,X2)
    | vd151 = vd165 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in','dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))') ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ! [X9,X10,X9,X10,X13,X14] :
      ( ( ~ m(X10)
        | X9 = X10
        | X9 = vplus(X10,esk2_2(X9,X10))
        | X10 = vplus(X9,esk3_2(X9,X10)) )
      & ( X9 != X10
        | m(X10) )
      & ( X9 != vplus(X10,X13)
        | m(X10) )
      & ( X10 != vplus(X9,X14)
        | m(X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)'])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X1] : vd165 = vplus(vd151,X1)
      | ? [X2] : vd151 = vplus(vd165,X2)
      | vd151 = vd165 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( m(X1)
    | X2 != vplus(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( vd165 != vplus(vd151,X3)
      & vd151 != vplus(vd165,X4)
      & vd151 != vd165 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X1 = vplus(X2,esk3_2(X2,X1))
    | X2 = vplus(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))
    | X2 = X1
    | ~ m(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    m(X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    vd165 != vplus(vd151,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( vplus(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1)) = X2
    | vplus(X2,esk3_2(X2,X1)) = X1
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vplus(vd165,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( vplus(X1,esk2_2(vd151,X1)) = vd151
    | X1 = vd151
    | X1 != vd165 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vd165,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : NUM835+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 10:17:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 14
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 9
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 39
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 50
% 0.24/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 11
% 0.24/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 39
% 0.24/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 912
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 58
% 0.24/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 677
% 0.24/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 177
% 0.24/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 18
% 0.24/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.24/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 21
% 0.24/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 8953
% 0.24/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 8834
% 0.24/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 21
% 0.24/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 8869
% 0.24/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 62
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 138
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 0.24/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.24/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 31
% 0.24/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 89
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7725
% 0.24/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 25329
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 27
% 0.24/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3991
% 0.24/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3324
% 0.24/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 201
% 0.24/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 438
% 0.24/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 75
% 0.24/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 74
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 84715
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41  # User time                : 0.141 s
% 0.24/1.41  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Total time               : 0.148 s
% 0.24/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 9164 pages
% 0.24/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------