TSTP Solution File: NUM835+1 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : NUM835+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 12:38:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  13   ~;  18   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   4 sgn  10   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)',axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( m(X6)
    <=> ( X5 = X6
        | ? [X7] : X5 = vplus(X6,X7)
        | ? [X8] : X6 = vplus(X5,X8) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AU95IRmsWi/E---3.1_12922.p','def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)') ).

fof('dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))',conjecture,
    ( ? [X1] : vd165 = vplus(vd151,X1)
    | ? [X2] : vd151 = vplus(vd165,X2)
    | vd151 = vd165 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AU95IRmsWi/E---3.1_12922.p','dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))') ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ! [X59,X60,X63,X64,X65,X66] :
      ( ( ~ m(X60)
        | X59 = X60
        | X59 = vplus(X60,esk2_2(X59,X60))
        | X60 = vplus(X59,esk3_2(X59,X60)) )
      & ( X63 != X64
        | m(X64) )
      & ( X63 != vplus(X64,X65)
        | m(X64) )
      & ( X64 != vplus(X63,X66)
        | m(X64) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['def(cond(conseq(105), 0), 1)'])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X1] : vd165 = vplus(vd151,X1)
      | ? [X2] : vd151 = vplus(vd165,X2)
      | vd151 = vd165 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['dis(case_distinction(conseq(110)))']) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( m(X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X43,X44] :
      ( vd165 != vplus(vd151,X43)
      & vd151 != vplus(vd165,X44)
      & vd151 != vd165 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X2 = X1
    | X2 = vplus(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))
    | X1 = vplus(X2,esk3_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ m(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    m(X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    vd165 != vplus(vd151,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( vplus(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2)) = X2
    | vplus(X2,esk2_2(X1,X2)) = X1
    | X2 = X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vplus(vd165,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    vd151 != vd165,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : NUM835+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Jun 22 22:59:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AU95IRmsWi/E---3.1_12922.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.2.0
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # sh5l with pid 13003 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with pid 13009 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 39
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 49
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 42
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 94
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 29
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 21
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 128
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 102
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 105
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 23
% 0.19/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 61
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 32
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 13
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 50
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 71
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 19
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 39
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 39
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3171
% 0.19/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 526
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------