TSTP Solution File: NUM793^4 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : NUM793^4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 13:56:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 75.97s 75.48s
% Output : Proof 75.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : NUM793^4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 18:23:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 75.97/75.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 75.97/75.48 % Mode: mode478:USE_SINE=true:SINE_TOLERANCE=2.0:SINE_GENERALITY_THRESHOLD=16:SINE_RANK_LIMIT=1.:SINE_DEPTH=0
% 75.97/75.48 % Inferences: 2769
% 75.97/75.48 % SZS output start Proof
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_n_eq, type, n_eq : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_l_some, type, l_some : ($i>($i>$o)>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_eigen__2, type, eigen__2 : $i).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_is_of, type, is_of : ($i>($i>$o)>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_eigen__1, type, eigen__1 : $i).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_frac, type, frac : $i).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : $i).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_l_or, type, l_or : ($o>$o>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_ect, type, ect : ($i>($i>$i>$o)>$i)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_class, type, class : ($i>$i)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_rt_is, type, rt_is : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_moref, type, moref : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_rt_less, type, rt_less : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_and3, type, and3 : ($o>$o>$o>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_rt_lessis, type, rt_lessis : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_in, type, in : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(ty_inf, type, inf : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X1:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X1) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__1))) @ ((moref @ X1) @ X2)))))) => ((rt_less @ eigen__1) @ eigen__0)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> ((rt_less @ eigen__1) @ eigen__0),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> (((is_of @ eigen__1) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_lessis @ eigen__2) @ eigen__1) => (((rt_less @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((rt_less @ eigen__2) @ X1)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_less @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ eigen__2))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__1))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3))))))) @ ((rt_is @ eigen__1) @ X1)) => ((rt_lessis @ X1) @ eigen__1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_lessis @ eigen__2) @ X1) => (((rt_less @ X1) @ X2) => ((rt_less @ eigen__2) @ X2))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> (((is_of @ eigen__0) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_less @ eigen__2) @ eigen__0) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X1:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X1) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__2))) @ ((moref @ X1) @ X2)))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_lessis @ eigen__2) @ eigen__1) => (((rt_less @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((rt_less @ eigen__2) @ X1))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> ((is_of @ eigen__2) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> ((rt_less @ eigen__2) @ eigen__0),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> ((rt_lessis @ eigen__2) @ eigen__1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP12,plain,sP12 <=> ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X1:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X1) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__2))) @ ((moref @ X1) @ X2)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP13,plain,sP13 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3)))))) => ((rt_less @ X1) @ eigen__0)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP14,plain,sP14 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4)))))) => ((rt_less @ X2) @ X1)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP15,plain,sP15 <=> (sP2 => sP10),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP15])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP16,plain,sP16 <=> (sP10 => sP12),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP16])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP17,plain,sP17 <=> (sP11 => sP15),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP17])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP18,plain,sP18 <=> ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X1:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X1) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__1))) @ ((moref @ X1) @ X2)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP18])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP19,plain,sP19 <=> ((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X1:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X1) @ (class @ eigen__1))) @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__2))) @ ((moref @ X1) @ X2))))))) @ ((rt_is @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP19])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP20,plain,sP20 <=> (((is_of @ eigen__0) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => sP13),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP20])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP21,plain,sP21 <=> (sP9 => sP6),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP21])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP22,plain,sP22 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_less @ X1) @ X2) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4))))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP22])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP23,plain,sP23 <=> (((is_of @ eigen__0) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => sP17),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP23])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP24,plain,sP24 <=> (sP9 => (sP19 => sP11)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP24])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP25,plain,sP25 <=> (sP19 => sP11),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP25])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP26,plain,sP26 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X3:$i]:(((is_of @ X3) @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((rt_lessis @ X1) @ X2) => (((rt_less @ X2) @ X3) => ((rt_less @ X1) @ X3))))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP26])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP27,plain,sP27 <=> (((is_of @ eigen__1) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => sP5),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP27])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP28,plain,sP28 <=> ((is_of @ eigen__1) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP28])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP29,plain,sP29 <=> ((is_of @ eigen__0) @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP29])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP30,plain,sP30 <=> (sP28 => sP1),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP30])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP31,plain,sP31 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4))))))) @ ((rt_is @ X1) @ X2)) => ((rt_lessis @ X2) @ X1)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP31])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(sP32,plain,sP32 <=> (sP9 => sP4),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP32])])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(def_all_of,definition,(all_of = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(![X3:$i]:(((is_of @ X3) @ X1) => (X2 @ X3))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(def_rat,definition,(rat = ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(def_rt_more,definition,(rt_more = (^[X1:$i]:(^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4)))))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(def_rt_moreis,definition,(rt_moreis = (^[X1:$i]:(^[X2:$i]:((l_or @ ((rt_more @ X1) @ X2)) @ ((rt_is @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(satz87d,conjecture,(![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X3:$i]:(((is_of @ X3) @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5)))))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X3))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5))))))) @ ((rt_is @ X2) @ X3)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X3))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5))))))))))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X3:$i]:(((is_of @ X3) @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5)))))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X3))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5))))))) @ ((rt_is @ X2) @ X3)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X3))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5)))))))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz87d])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h1,assumption,(~((sP29 => (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4)))))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4))))))) @ ((rt_is @ X1) @ X2)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4))))))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h2,assumption,sP29,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h3,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4)))))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4))))))) @ ((rt_is @ X1) @ X2)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X3) @ X4)))))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h4,assumption,(~((sP28 => (![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (sP18 => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__1))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3))))))) @ ((rt_is @ eigen__1) @ X1)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3))))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h5,assumption,sP28,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h6,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (sP18 => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__1))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3))))))) @ ((rt_is @ eigen__1) @ X1)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X2:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X2) @ (class @ eigen__0))) @ ((inf @ X3) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((moref @ X2) @ X3)))))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h7,assumption,(~((sP9 => (sP18 => (sP19 => sP12))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h8,assumption,sP9,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h9,assumption,(~((sP18 => (sP19 => sP12)))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h10,assumption,sP18,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h11,assumption,(~((sP19 => sP12))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h12,assumption,sP19,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(h13,assumption,(~(sP12)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(1,plain,(~(sP8) | sP23),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(2,plain,((~(sP23) | ~(sP29)) | sP17),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(3,plain,((~(sP17) | ~(sP11)) | sP15),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(4,plain,((~(sP15) | ~(sP2)) | sP10),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(5,plain,(~(sP6) | sP3),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(6,plain,((~(sP3) | ~(sP28)) | sP8),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(7,plain,((~(sP21) | ~(sP9)) | sP6),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(8,plain,((~(sP20) | ~(sP29)) | sP13),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(9,plain,(~(sP13) | sP30),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(10,plain,((~(sP30) | ~(sP28)) | sP1),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(11,plain,((~(sP1) | ~(sP18)) | sP2),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(12,plain,((~(sP27) | ~(sP28)) | sP5),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(13,plain,(~(sP5) | sP24),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(14,plain,((~(sP24) | ~(sP9)) | sP25),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(15,plain,((~(sP25) | ~(sP19)) | sP11),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(16,plain,((~(sP32) | ~(sP9)) | sP4),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(17,plain,(~(sP4) | sP7),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(18,plain,((~(sP7) | ~(sP29)) | sP16),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(19,plain,((~(sP16) | ~(sP10)) | sP12),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(20,plain,(~(sP26) | sP21),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(21,plain,(~(sP31) | sP27),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(22,plain,(~(sP22) | sP32),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(23,plain,(~(sP14) | sP20),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(satz87a,axiom,((all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ rat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ rat))) @ (^[X2:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ rat))) @ (^[X3:$i]:(((rt_lessis @ X1) @ X2) => (((rt_less @ X2) @ X3) => ((rt_less @ X1) @ X3)))))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(24,plain,sP26,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[satz87a]).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(satz84,axiom,((all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ rat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ rat))) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((rt_moreis @ X1) @ X2) => ((rt_lessis @ X2) @ X1))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(25,plain,sP31,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[satz84]).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(satz83,axiom,((all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ rat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ rat))) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((rt_less @ X1) @ X2) => ((rt_more @ X2) @ X1))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(26,plain,sP22,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[satz83]).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(satz82,axiom,((all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:((in @ X1) @ rat))) @ (^[X1:$i]:((all_of @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ rat))) @ (^[X2:$i]:(((rt_more @ X1) @ X2) => ((rt_less @ X2) @ X1))))))).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(27,plain,sP14,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[satz82]).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(28,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h13,h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,h2,h5,h8,h10,h12,h13,24,25,26,27])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(29,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h12,h13])],[h11,28,h12,h13])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(30,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h11])],[h9,29,h10,h11])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(31,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h7,30,h8,h9])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(32,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h6,31,h7])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(33,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h4,h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,32,h5,h6])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(34,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h3,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h4]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h3,33,h4])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(35,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h2,h3])],[h1,34,h2,h3])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(36,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,35,h1])).
% 75.97/75.48 thf(0,theorem,(![X1:$i]:(((is_of @ X1) @ (^[X2:$i]:((in @ X2) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X2:$i]:(((is_of @ X2) @ (^[X3:$i]:((in @ X3) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (![X3:$i]:(((is_of @ X3) @ (^[X4:$i]:((in @ X4) @ ((ect @ frac) @ n_eq)))) => (((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5)))))) => (((l_or @ ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X2))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X3))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5))))))) @ ((rt_is @ X2) @ X3)) => ((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X4:$i]:((l_some @ frac) @ (^[X5:$i]:(((and3 @ ((inf @ X4) @ (class @ X1))) @ ((inf @ X5) @ (class @ X3))) @ ((moref @ X4) @ X5)))))))))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[36,h0])).
% 75.97/75.48 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------