TSTP Solution File: NUM742_8 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : NUM742_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:42:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.55s 1.57s
% Output   : Refutation 2.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   9 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   79 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  58   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0   ^;  21   !;   0   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(x_type,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(y_type,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(z_type,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(lessf_type,type,
    lessf: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(eq_type,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    lessf @ x @ z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz51a) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( lessf @ x @ z ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ( lessf @ x @ z ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $o] :
      ( ~ ~ A
     => A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',et) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $true,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ A @ B )
     => ( ( lessf @ B @ C )
       => ( lessf @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz50) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ A @ B )
     => ( ( lessf @ B @ C )
       => ( lessf @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    lessf @ y @ z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k) ).

thf(13,plain,
    lessf @ y @ z,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ A @ B )
     => ( eq @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz38) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ A @ B )
     => ( eq @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ ( lessf @ x @ y )
   => ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ~ ( lessf @ x @ y )
   => ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: frac] : ( eq @ A @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz37) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: frac] : ( eq @ A @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac,D: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ A @ B )
     => ( ( eq @ A @ C )
       => ( ( eq @ B @ D )
         => ( lessf @ C @ D ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz45) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [A: frac,B: frac,C: frac,D: frac] :
      ( ( lessf @ A @ B )
     => ( ( eq @ A @ C )
       => ( ( eq @ B @ D )
         => ( lessf @ C @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cvc4,[status(thm)],[10,14,20,13,18,11,23,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem  : NUM742_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.05/0.12  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime : Thu May 18 16:48:33 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.83/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.96/0.91  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (117ms). 
% 0.96/0.92  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.53/1.14  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.53/1.14  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.53/1.14  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.60/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.60/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.74/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 1.74/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.74/1.24  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.55/1.57  % External prover 'cvc4' found a proof!
% 2.55/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.55/1.57  % Time passed: 1086ms (effective reasoning time: 647ms)
% 2.55/1.57  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.55/1.57  % Axioms used in derivation (7): satz50, l, satz45, satz38, k, satz37, et
% 2.55/1.57  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 2.55/1.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1086 ms resp. 647 ms w/o parsing
% 2.55/1.60  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.55/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------