TSTP Solution File: NUM713_8 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM713_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:57:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  17 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (  10   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn;  26   !;   0   ?;  26   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    x: nat ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    y: nat ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    z: nat ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    pl: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    ts: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk1_0: nat ).

tff(satz32a,conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( ts(x,z) != pl(ts(y,z),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vHnGJOa9oq/E---3.1_338.p',satz32a) ).

tff(satz30,axiom,
    ! [X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] : ( ts(X3,pl(X4,X5)) = pl(ts(X3,X4),ts(X3,X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vHnGJOa9oq/E---3.1_338.p',satz30) ).

tff(satz29,axiom,
    ! [X3: nat,X4: nat] : ( ts(X3,X4) = ts(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vHnGJOa9oq/E---3.1_338.p',satz29) ).

tff(m,axiom,
    ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( x != pl(y,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vHnGJOa9oq/E---3.1_338.p',m) ).

tff(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( ts(x,z) != pl(ts(y,z),X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz32a]) ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X8: nat,X9: nat,X10: nat] : ( ts(X8,pl(X9,X10)) = pl(ts(X8,X9),ts(X8,X10)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz30]) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X11: nat,X12: nat] : ( ts(X11,X12) = ts(X12,X11) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz29]) ).

tff(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X6: nat] : ( ts(x,z) != pl(ts(y,z),X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

tcf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] : ts(X1,pl(X3,X4)) = pl(ts(X1,X3),ts(X1,X4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tcf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3: nat,X1: nat] : ts(X1,X3) = ts(X3,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: nat] : ts(x,z) != pl(ts(y,z),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] : pl(ts(X1,X3),ts(X3,X4)) = ts(X3,pl(X1,X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

tff(c_0_12,plain,
    x = pl(y,esk1_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: nat] : ts(z,pl(y,X1)) != ts(x,z),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    x = pl(y,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X3: nat,X1: nat] : ts(X1,X3) = ts(X3,X1),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(ar,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : NUM713_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:09:44 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.vHnGJOa9oq/E---3.1_338.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # sh5l with pid 425 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 431 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 14
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 17
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 17
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 6
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 386
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------