TSTP Solution File: NUM702^4 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : NUM702^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 12:36:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.35s 0.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   59 (  43 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  302 (  91 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   42 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  622 (  81   ~;  63   |;  11   &; 404   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  63  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   26 (  23 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  153 ( 112   ^  41   !;   0   ?; 153   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    is_of: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    all_of: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_61,type,
    imp: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    d_not: $o > $o ).

thf(decl_67,type,
    l_or: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_71,type,
    non: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_72,type,
    l_some: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_77,type,
    e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_123,type,
    nat: $i ).

thf(decl_124,type,
    n_is: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_127,type,
    n_some: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_130,type,
    n_1: $i ).

thf(decl_142,type,
    n_pl: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_147,type,
    diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_148,type,
    d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_149,type,
    iii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_151,type,
    moreis: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_152,type,
    lessis: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_153,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_154,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_155,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_197,type,
    esk45_2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(def_all_of,axiom,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [X3: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( is_of @ X4 @ X3 )
         => ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_all_of) ).

thf(def_is_of,axiom,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] : ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_is_of) ).

thf(def_d_not,axiom,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [X76: $o] : ( imp @ X76 @ ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_d_not) ).

thf(def_imp,axiom,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [X74: $o,X75: $o] :
          ( X74
         => X75 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_imp) ).

thf(def_e_is,axiom,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X101: $i,X102: $i] : ( X101 = X102 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_e_is) ).

thf(def_l_some,axiom,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( d_not
          @ ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ X1 )
            @ ( non @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_l_some) ).

thf(def_diffprop,axiom,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X207: $i,X4: $i] : ( n_is @ X1 @ ( n_pl @ X207 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_diffprop) ).

thf(def_n_is,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_n_is) ).

thf(def_d_29_ii,axiom,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X210: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X1 @ X210 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_d_29_ii) ).

thf(def_n_some,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X423: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X423 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat @ Z0 @ X423 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_n_some) ).

thf(def_l_or,axiom,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [X83: $o] : ( imp @ ( d_not @ X83 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_l_or) ).

thf(def_iii,axiom,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X211: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X211 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_iii) ).

thf(def_moreis,axiom,
    ( moreis
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X229: $i] : ( l_or @ ( d_29_ii @ X1 @ X229 ) @ ( n_is @ X1 @ X229 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_moreis) ).

thf(def_lessis,axiom,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X230: $i] : ( l_or @ ( iii @ X1 @ X230 ) @ ( n_is @ X1 @ X230 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',def_lessis) ).

thf(satz26b,conjecture,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X335: $i] : ( in @ X335 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X336: $i] :
            ( ( d_29_ii @ ( n_pl @ X336 @ n_1 ) @ X1 )
           => ( moreis @ X336 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',satz26b) ).

thf(satz26,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X331: $i] : ( in @ X331 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X332: $i] :
            ( ( iii @ X332 @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ n_1 ) )
           => ( lessis @ X332 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p',satz26) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] : ( Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] : ( Z1 = Z2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X422: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X422 @ Z0 )
             => ( non @ Z0 @ Z1 @ X422 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_some]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
          ( Z0
          = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop]) ).

thf(c_0_25,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is,c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X422: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X422 @ Z0 )
             => ( non @ Z0 @ Z1 @ X422 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X424: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X424 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z0
                    = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X424 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
          ( Z0
          = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_29,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X423: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X423 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat @ Z0 @ X423 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some,c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_or]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X425: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X425 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z1
                    = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X425 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii]) ).

thf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( moreis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ! [X426: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X426 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                        ( Z0
                        = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) )
                    @ X426 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_moreis]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X424: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X424 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z0
                    = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X424 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ! [X427: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X427 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                        ( Z1
                        = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                    @ X427 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lessis]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X425: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X425 @ nat )
             => ( non @ nat
                @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                    ( Z1
                    = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                @ X425 ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

thf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( moreis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ! [X426: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X426 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                        ( Z0
                        = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) )
                    @ X426 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_25]),c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( ! [X427: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X427 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z2: $i] :
                        ( Z1
                        = ( n_pl @ Z0 @ Z2 ) )
                    @ X427 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_25]),c_0_34]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X431: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X431 @ nat )
       => ! [X430: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X430 @ nat )
           => ( ( ! [X428: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X428 @ nat )
                   => ( non @ nat
                      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                          ( ( n_pl @ X430 @ n_1 )
                          = ( n_pl @ X431 @ Z0 ) )
                      @ X428 ) )
               => ~ $true )
             => ( ( ( ! [X429: $i] :
                        ( ( in @ X429 @ nat )
                       => ( non @ nat
                          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                              ( X430
                              = ( n_pl @ X431 @ Z0 ) )
                          @ X429 ) )
                   => ~ $true )
                 => ~ $true )
               => ( X430 = X431 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz26b])]),c_0_22]),c_0_33]),c_0_37]) ).

thf(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X652: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X652 @ nat )
     => ! [X651: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X651 @ nat )
         => ( ( ! [X649: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X649 @ nat )
                 => ( non @ nat
                    @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                        ( ( n_pl @ X652 @ n_1 )
                        = ( n_pl @ X651 @ Z0 ) )
                    @ X649 ) )
             => ~ $true )
           => ( ( ( ! [X650: $i] :
                      ( ( in @ X650 @ nat )
                     => ( non @ nat
                        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                            ( X652
                            = ( n_pl @ X651 @ Z0 ) )
                        @ X650 ) )
                 => ~ $true )
               => ~ $true )
             => ( X651 = X652 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz26]),c_0_22]),c_0_36]),c_0_38]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X803: $i] :
      ( ( in @ esk1_0 @ nat )
      & ( in @ esk2_0 @ nat )
      & ( ( in @ esk3_0 @ nat )
        | ~ $true )
      & ( ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ n_1 )
                = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
            @ esk3_0 )
        | ~ $true )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X803 @ nat )
        | ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( esk2_0
              = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
          @ X803 )
        | ~ $true )
      & ( $true
        | ~ $true )
      & ( esk2_0 != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X1028: $i,X1029: $i,X1030: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ ( esk45_2 @ X1028 @ X1029 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X1029 = X1028 )
        | ~ ( in @ X1030 @ nat )
        | ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( ( n_pl @ X1028 @ n_1 )
              = ( n_pl @ X1029 @ Z0 ) )
          @ X1030 )
        | ~ ( in @ X1029 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X1028 @ nat ) )
      & ( ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X1028
                = ( n_pl @ X1029 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk45_2 @ X1028 @ X1029 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X1029 = X1028 )
        | ~ ( in @ X1030 @ nat )
        | ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( ( n_pl @ X1028 @ n_1 )
              = ( n_pl @ X1029 @ Z0 ) )
          @ X1030 )
        | ~ ( in @ X1029 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X1028 @ nat ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( X1029 = X1028 )
        | ~ ( in @ X1030 @ nat )
        | ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( ( n_pl @ X1028 @ n_1 )
              = ( n_pl @ X1029 @ Z0 ) )
          @ X1030 )
        | ~ ( in @ X1029 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X1028 @ nat ) )
      & ( ( in @ ( esk45_2 @ X1028 @ X1029 ) @ nat )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X1029 = X1028 )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X1029 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X1028 @ nat ) )
      & ( ~ ( non @ nat
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( X1028
                = ( n_pl @ X1029 @ Z0 ) )
            @ ( esk45_2 @ X1028 @ X1029 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ( X1029 = X1028 )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X1029 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X1028 @ nat ) )
      & ( $true
        | ( X1029 = X1028 )
        | $true
        | ~ ( in @ X1029 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X1028 @ nat ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ n_1 )
            = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
        @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X4 = X1 )
      | ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( ( n_pl @ X1 @ n_1 )
            = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X5 )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk45_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( in @ esk3_0 @ nat )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( in @ ( esk45_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ( X4 = X1 )
      | ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( ( n_pl @ X1 @ n_1 )
            = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X5 )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( non @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
          ( ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ n_1 )
          = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
      @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

thf(c_0_48,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X5: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( ( n_pl @ X1 @ n_1 )
            = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X5 )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( non @ nat
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( X1
              = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
          @ ( esk45_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

thf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk3_0 @ nat,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]) ).

thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk1_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk2_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( esk2_0
            = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_54,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( in @ ( esk45_2 @ X1 @ X4 ) @ nat )
      | ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( ( n_pl @ X1 @ n_1 )
            = ( n_pl @ X4 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X5 )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

thf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( non @ nat
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
          ( esk2_0
          = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
      @ ( esk45_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49]),c_0_50]),c_0_51])]),c_0_52]) ).

thf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( non @ nat
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( esk2_0
            = ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ Z0 ) )
        @ X1 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    in @ ( esk45_2 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) @ nat,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_54]),c_0_49]),c_0_50]),c_0_51])]),c_0_52]) ).

thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem    : NUM702^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.08/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 03:54:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.51  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7hZbN7fMJ/E---3.1_31986.p
% 0.35/0.67  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of indeq @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ (d_11_i @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1)) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.67  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.69  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of prop2 @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.69  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.71  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of prop2 @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.71  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.73  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of prop2 @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.73  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.76  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of prop2 @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.76  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.77  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of prop2 @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.78  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.80  # Type mismatch in argument #1 of prop2 @ ($not @ db(4)) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($db_lam @ db(0) @ ($@_var @ db(6) @ db(1) @ db(0)))) @ db(3) @ db(2) @ db(1) @ db(0): expected $i but got $o
% 0.35/0.80  eprover: Type error
% 0.35/0.82  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.35/0.82  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.35/0.82  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # pre_casc_4 with pid 32134 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Result found by pre_casc_4
% 0.35/0.82  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.35/0.82  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.35/0.82  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN
% 0.35/0.82  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
% 0.35/0.82  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 28s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # full_lambda_5 with pid 32149 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Result found by full_lambda_5
% 0.35/0.82  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.35/0.82  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.5,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.35/0.82  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN
% 0.35/0.82  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
% 0.35/0.82  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.82  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 28s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.82  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.35/0.82  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.35/0.82  
% 0.35/0.82  # Proof found!
% 0.35/0.82  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.35/0.82  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.82  # Parsed axioms                        : 407
% 0.35/0.82  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 255
% 0.35/0.82  # Initial clauses                      : 576
% 0.35/0.82  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 301
% 0.35/0.82  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 275
% 0.35/0.82  # Processed clauses                    : 618
% 0.35/0.82  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.35/0.82  # ...subsumed                          : 52
% 0.35/0.82  # ...remaining for further processing  : 560
% 0.35/0.82  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 939
% 0.35/0.82  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.35/0.82  # Generated clauses                    : 4254
% 0.35/0.82  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3300
% 0.35/0.82  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Paramodulations                      : 2405
% 0.35/0.82  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.35/0.82  # NegExts                              : 1
% 0.35/0.82  # Equation resolutions                 : 944
% 0.35/0.82  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Total rewrite steps                  : 905
% 0.35/0.82  # ...of those cached                   : 864
% 0.35/0.82  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.35/0.82  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.35/0.82  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.35/0.82  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.35/0.82  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.35/0.82  # Current number of processed clauses  : 257
% 0.35/0.82  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 57
% 0.35/0.82  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.35/0.82  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.35/0.82  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 189
% 0.35/0.82  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3194
% 0.35/0.82  # ...number of literals in the above   : 21523
% 0.35/0.82  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Current number of archived clauses   : 262
% 0.35/0.82  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 60259
% 0.35/0.82  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2178
% 0.35/0.82  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 45
% 0.35/0.82  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 160
% 0.35/0.82  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 43
% 0.35/0.82  # BW rewrite match successes           : 11
% 0.35/0.82  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.35/0.82  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 211730
% 0.35/0.82  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 32506
% 0.35/0.82  
% 0.35/0.82  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.82  # User time                : 0.266 s
% 0.35/0.82  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.35/0.82  # Total time               : 0.279 s
% 0.35/0.82  # Maximum resident set size: 6440 pages
% 0.35/0.82  
% 0.35/0.82  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.82  # User time                : 0.279 s
% 0.35/0.82  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.35/0.82  # Total time               : 0.294 s
% 0.35/0.82  # Maximum resident set size: 2408 pages
% 0.35/0.82  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.35/0.82  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------