TSTP Solution File: NUM695_8 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM695_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 03:33:29 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   5   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   9   !;   0   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    x: nat ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    n_1: nat ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    pl: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    sK0: nat > nat ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    more: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    sQ1_eqProxy: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).

tff(f32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f21]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] : more(pl(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] : more(pl(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f4,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat] : more(pl(X1,X3),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2dhjRpIw15/Vampire---4.8_28948',satz18) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ~ more(pl(n_1,x),n_1),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f20,f24]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] : ( suc(X0) = pl(n_1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] : ( suc(X0) = pl(n_1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat] : ( suc(X1) = pl(n_1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2dhjRpIw15/Vampire---4.8_28948',satz4g) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ~ more(suc(x),n_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ~ more(suc(x),n_1),
    inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ more(suc(x),n_1),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f6,conjecture,
    more(suc(x),n_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2dhjRpIw15/Vampire---4.8_28948',satz24b) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : NUM695_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 16:28:34 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.33  This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.11/0.33  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2dhjRpIw15/Vampire---4.8_28948
% 0.60/0.80  % (29060)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29059)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29063)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29058)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29064)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29062)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.80  
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)Memory used [KB]: 950
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29062)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (29061)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.80  
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)Memory used [KB]: 953
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29061)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29058)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80  % (29063)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.80  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.80  
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)Memory used [KB]: 957
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29065)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80  % (29056)Success in time 0.467 s
% 0.60/0.80  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------