TSTP Solution File: NUM693_8 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM693_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:44:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 10 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 23 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 13 ~; 5 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 4 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 19 !; 2 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
nat: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
x: nat ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
n_1: nat ).
tff(func_def_2,type,
suc: nat > nat ).
tff(func_def_3,type,
pl: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
sK0: nat > nat ).
tff(pred_def_1,type,
more: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).
tff(f33,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f32,f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
n_1 != x,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
( ( n_1 != x )
& ~ more(x,n_1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ~ more(x,n_1)
=> ( n_1 = x ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,conjecture,
( ~ more(x,n_1)
=> ( n_1 = x ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz24) ).
tff(f32,plain,
n_1 = x,
inference(resolution,[],[f31,f20]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
~ more(x,n_1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f31,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( more(X0,n_1)
| ( n_1 = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f25,f26]) ).
tff(f26,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ( pl(n_1,sK0(X0)) = X0 )
| ( n_1 = X0 ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f23,f22]) ).
tff(f22,plain,
! [X0: nat] : ( suc(X0) = pl(n_1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
! [X0: nat] : ( suc(X0) = pl(n_1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,axiom,
! [X1: nat] : ( suc(X1) = pl(n_1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz4g) ).
tff(f23,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ( suc(sK0(X0)) = X0 )
| ( n_1 = X0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ( suc(sK0(X0)) = X0 )
| ( n_1 = X0 ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f16,f18]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ? [X1: nat] : ( suc(X1) = X0 )
=> ( suc(sK0(X0)) = X0 ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ? [X1: nat] : ( suc(X1) = X0 )
| ( n_1 = X0 ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ( n_1 != X0 )
=> ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( suc(X1) != X0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,axiom,
! [X1: nat] :
( ( n_1 != X1 )
=> ~ ! [X2: nat] : ( suc(X2) != X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz3) ).
tff(f25,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] : more(pl(X0,X1),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] : more(pl(X0,X1),X0),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,axiom,
! [X1: nat,X3: nat] : more(pl(X1,X3),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz18) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : NUM693_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 05:33:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1625)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1628)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1626)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1627)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1629)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1630)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1632)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1634)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.75
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.75 % (1634)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1634)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1634)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1628)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)Memory used [KB]: 948
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1630)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)Memory used [KB]: 951
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1629)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1625)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)Memory used [KB]: 967
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)Memory used [KB]: 966
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1628)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1626)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1630)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1632)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1625)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1629)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1624"
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.76 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.76
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Memory used [KB]: 962
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.76 % (1627)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.76 % (1624)Success in time 0.377 s
% 0.22/0.76 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------